Finneas J R Catling1, Anthony H Wolff1. 1. Division of Surgery and Allied Specialities, Barnet Hospital, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Clinical interventions and death in the intensive care unit (ICU) depend on complex patterns in patients' longitudinal data. We aim to anticipate these events earlier and more consistently so that staff can consider preemptive action. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We use a temporal convolutional network to encode longitudinal data and a feedforward neural network to encode demographic data from 4713 ICU admissions in 2014-2018. For each hour of each admission, we predict events in the subsequent 1-6 hours. We compare performance with other models including a recurrent neural network. RESULTS: Our model performed similarly to the recurrent neural network for some events and outperformed it for others. This performance increase was more evident in a sensitivity analysis where the prediction timeframe was varied. Average positive predictive value (95% CI) was 0.786 (0.781-0.790) and 0.738 (0.732-0.743) for up- and down-titrating FiO2, 0.574 (0.519-0.625) for extubation, 0.139 (0.117-0.162) for intubation, 0.533 (0.492-0.572) for starting noradrenaline, 0.441 (0.433-0.448) for fluid challenge, and 0.315 (0.282-0.352) for death. DISCUSSION: Events were better predicted where their important determinants were captured in structured electronic health data, and where they occurred in homogeneous circumstances. We produce partial dependence plots that show our model learns clinically-plausible associations between its inputs and predictions. CONCLUSION: Temporal convolutional networks improve prediction of clinical events when used to represent longitudinal ICU data.
OBJECTIVE: Clinical interventions and death in the intensive care unit (ICU) depend on complex patterns in patients' longitudinal data. We aim to anticipate these events earlier and more consistently so that staff can consider preemptive action. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We use a temporal convolutional network to encode longitudinal data and a feedforward neural network to encode demographic data from 4713 ICU admissions in 2014-2018. For each hour of each admission, we predict events in the subsequent 1-6 hours. We compare performance with other models including a recurrent neural network. RESULTS: Our model performed similarly to the recurrent neural network for some events and outperformed it for others. This performance increase was more evident in a sensitivity analysis where the prediction timeframe was varied. Average positive predictive value (95% CI) was 0.786 (0.781-0.790) and 0.738 (0.732-0.743) for up- and down-titrating FiO2, 0.574 (0.519-0.625) for extubation, 0.139 (0.117-0.162) for intubation, 0.533 (0.492-0.572) for starting noradrenaline, 0.441 (0.433-0.448) for fluid challenge, and 0.315 (0.282-0.352) for death. DISCUSSION: Events were better predicted where their important determinants were captured in structured electronic health data, and where they occurred in homogeneous circumstances. We produce partial dependence plots that show our model learns clinically-plausible associations between its inputs and predictions. CONCLUSION: Temporal convolutional networks improve prediction of clinical events when used to represent longitudinal ICU data.
Authors: Nicola White; Fiona Reid; Victoria Vickerstaff; Priscilla Harries; Christopher Tomlinson; Patrick Stone Journal: BMJ Support Palliat Care Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Derek K Chu; Lisa H-Y Kim; Paul J Young; Nima Zamiri; Saleh A Almenawer; Roman Jaeschke; Wojciech Szczeklik; Holger J Schünemann; John D Neary; Waleed Alhazzani Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Michael E Detsky; Michael O Harhay; Dominique F Bayard; Aaron M Delman; Anna E Buehler; Saida A Kent; Isabella V Ciuffetelli; Elizabeth Cooney; Nicole B Gabler; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Mark E Mikkelsen; Scott D Halpern Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Thomas Desautels; Ritankar Das; Jacob Calvert; Monica Trivedi; Charlotte Summers; David J Wales; Ari Ercole Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-09-15 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Eduardo A Trujillo Rivera; Anita K Patel; Qing Zeng-Treitler; James M Chamberlain; James E Bost; Julia A Heneghan; Hiroki Morizono; Murray M Pollack Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2021-01-01 Impact factor: 3.971