Literature DB >> 31857762

Correlation of Specimen/Breast Volume Ratio to Cosmetic Outcome After Breast Conserving Surgery.

Tarek Hashem1, Ahmed Morsi1, Ahmed Farahat1, Tarek Zaghloul1, Amira Hamed2.   

Abstract

Breast conserving surgery (BCS) is currently the standard of care for early breast cancer. One of the key determinants for the line of treatment in breast cancer is the size of the tumor in relation to the breast size. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of the ratio of the excised specimen to breast volume on the cosmetic outcome after conventional BCS. This is a retrospective study conducted on female patients with early stage breast cancer who underwent BCT at National Cancer Institute, Cairo University. The study included 41 patients with stage I and II breast cancer. Breast volume was calculated using mammography, and ratio of the specimen to breast volume was determined. This ratio was correlated with the cosmetic outcome using the BCCT.core software. Thirty-six out of the 41 breast cancer patients completed the study. Favorable outcome (excellent + good) was detected in 52.7% of patients, while 47.3% had unfavorable outcome (fair + poor). Breast volume, tumor site, patients' age, and weight did not seem to alter the cosmetic result. The only statistically significant factors affecting the cosmetic outcome were the specimen volume and the ratio of the specimen to the normal breast volume (p = 0.006 and 0.019 respectively). In order to obtain a satisfactory cosmetic outcome after conventional BCS, the ratio of the excised specimen to breast volume has to be seriously considered. © Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Breast conserving surgery; Cosmetic outcome; Oncoplastic breast surgery

Year:  2019        PMID: 31857762      PMCID: PMC6895358          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-019-00973-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  8 in total

1.  Mammographic determination of breast volume: comparing different methods.

Authors:  C L Kalbhen; J J McGill; P M Fendley; K W Corrigan; J Angelats
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Towards an intelligent medical system for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment.

Authors:  Jaime S Cardoso; Maria J Cardoso
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2007-04-08       Impact factor: 5.326

3.  Objective decision making between conventional and oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy: An aesthetic and functional prospective cohort study.

Authors:  D Pukancsik; P Kelemen; M Újhelyi; E Kovács; N Udvarhelyi; N Mészáros; I Kenessey; T Kovács; M Kásler; Z Mátrai
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.424

4.  Recurrence rates after treatment of breast cancer with standard radiotherapy with or without additional radiation.

Authors:  H Bartelink; J C Horiot; P Poortmans; H Struikmans; W Van den Bogaert; I Barillot; A Fourquet; J Borger; J Jager; W Hoogenraad; L Collette; M Pierart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Late radiation side effects, cosmetic outcomes and pain in breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy : Risk-modifying factors.

Authors:  Ursula Hille-Betz; Bernhard Vaske; Michael Bremer; Philipp Soergel; Sudip Kundu; Rüdiger Klapdor; Peter Hillemanns; Christoph Henkenberens
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Long-term objective esthetic outcome after breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  André Hennigs; Benjamin Hartmann; Geraldine Rauch; Michael Golatta; Patrik Tabatabai; Christoph Domschke; Sarah Schott; Florian Schütz; Christof Sohn; Joerg Heil
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised.

Authors:  R A Cochrane; P Valasiadou; A R M Wilson; S K Al-Ghazal; R D Macmillan
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Preoperative measurement of breast cancer overestimates tumor size compared to pathological measurement.

Authors:  Yi-Zhou Jiang; Chen Xia; Wen-Ting Peng; Ke-Da Yu; Zhi-Gang Zhuang; Zhi-Ming Shao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.