Literature DB >> 31857679

Next-generation sequencing implicates oncogenic roles for p53 and JAK/STAT signaling in microcystic adnexal carcinomas.

May P Chan1,2,3, Komal R Plouffe4,5,6, Chia-Jen Liu4,5, Nallasivam Palanisamy7, Shannon Carskadon7, Lili Zhao8, Rosalynn M Nazarian9, Alison B Durham10,11, Timothy M Johnson10,11, Aleodor A Andea4,10,11, Rajiv M Patel4,10,11, Lori Lowe4,10,11, Douglas R Fullen4,10,11, Noah A Brown4, Scott A Tomlins4,11,5,6, Aaron M Udager4,5, Paul W Harms12,13,14,15.   

Abstract

Microcystic adnexal carcinoma is a locally aggressive sweat gland carcinoma characterized by its infiltrative growth and histopathologic overlap with benign adnexal tumors, often posing challenges to both diagnosis and management. Understanding the molecular underpinnings of microcystic adnexal carcinoma may allow for more accurate diagnosis and identify potential targetable oncogenic drivers. We characterized 18 microcystic adnexal carcinomas by targeted, multiplexed PCR-based DNA next-generation sequencing of the coding sequence of over 400 cancer-relevant genes. The majority of cases had relatively few (<8) prioritized somatic mutations, and lacked an ultraviolet (UV) signature. The most recurrent mutation was TP53 inactivation in four (22%) tumors. Frame-preserving insertions affecting the kinase domain of JAK1 were detected in three (17%) cases, and were nonoverlapping with TP53 mutations. Seven (39%) cases demonstrated copy number gain of at least one oncogene. By immunohistochemistry, p53 expression was significantly higher in microcystic adnexal carcinomas with TP53 mutations compared with those without such mutations and syringomas. Similarly, phospho-STAT3 expression was significantly higher in microcystic adnexal carcinomas harboring JAK1 kinase insertions compared with those with wild-type JAK1 and syringomas. In conclusion, microcystic adnexal carcinomas are molecularly heterogeneous tumors, with inactivated p53 or activated JAK/STAT signaling in a subset. Unlike most other nonmelanoma skin cancers involving sun-exposed areas, most microcystic adnexal carcinomas lack evidence of UV damage, and hence likely originate from a relatively photo-protected progenitor population in the dermis. These findings have implications for the biology, diagnosis, and treatment of microcystic adnexal carcinomas, including potential for therapeutic targeting of p53 or the JAK/STAT pathway in advanced tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31857679     DOI: 10.1038/s41379-019-0424-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  83 in total

Review 1.  Microcystic adnexal carcinoma with lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Masanori Ban; Shigeyuki Sugie; Hideki Kamiya; Yasuo Kitajima
Journal:  Dermatology       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.366

2.  Anatomoclinical study of 30 cases of sclerosing sweat duct carcinomas (microcystic adnexal carcinoma, syringomatous carcinoma and squamoid eccrine ductal carcinoma).

Authors:  E Frouin; M D Vignon-Pennamen; B Balme; B Cavelier-Balloy; U Zimmermann; N Ortonne; A Carlotti; L Pinquier; J André; B Cribier
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  Demographics and outcomes of microcystic adnexal carcinoma.

Authors:  Brian J King; Stanislav N Tolkachjov; Daniel S Winchester; Christian L Baum; Jerry D Brewer; Christopher J Arpey; Clark C Otley; Randall K Roenigk
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: management options based on long-term follow-up.

Authors:  C M Bier-Laning; D B Hom; M Gapany; J C Manivel; A J Duvall
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Metastatic Microcystic Adnexal Carcinoma with DNA Sequencing Results and Response to Systemic Antineoplastic Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Min-Bin Chen; Damian A Laber
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  Metastatic microcystic adnexal carcinoma in an immunocompromised patient.

Authors:  P Carroll; G D Goldstein; C W Brown
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.398

7.  Microcystic adnexal carcinoma: a distinct clinicopathologic entity.

Authors:  D J Goldstein; R J Barr; D J Santa Cruz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Microcystic adnexal carcinoma - aggressive infiltrative tumor often with innocent clinical appearance.

Authors:  Corinna Hamsch; Wolfgang Hartschuh
Journal:  J Dtsch Dermatol Ges       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 5.584

9.  Solitary syringoma. Report of five cases and clinicopathologic comparison with microcystic adnexal carcinoma of the skin.

Authors:  M S Henner; P E Shapiro; J H Ritter; D J Leffell; M R Wick
Journal:  Am J Dermatopathol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.533

10.  Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database analysis of microcystic adnexal carcinoma (sclerosing sweat duct carcinoma) of the skin.

Authors:  James B Yu; Rachel C Blitzblau; Sonya C Patel; Roy H Decker; Lynn D Wilson
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.339

View more
  3 in total

1.  Genomic evidence suggests that cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinomas can arise from squamous dysplastic precursors.

Authors:  Paul W Harms; Monique E Verhaegen; Kevin Hu; Steven M Hrycaj; May P Chan; Chia-Jen Liu; Marina Grachtchouk; Rajiv M Patel; Aaron M Udager; Andrzej A Dlugosz
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Four calcium signaling pathway-related genes were upregulated in microcystic adnexal carcinoma: transcriptome analysis and immunohistochemical validation.

Authors:  Shuaixia Yu; Yang Wang; Baijie Tang; Xiang Liu; Linhong Song; Gang Xu; Hong Zhu; Huajun Sun
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.253

Review 3.  Current Diagnosis and Treatment Options for Cutaneous Adnexal Neoplasms with Apocrine and Eccrine Differentiation.

Authors:  Iga Płachta; Marcin Kleibert; Anna M Czarnecka; Mateusz Spałek; Anna Szumera-Ciećkiewicz; Piotr Rutkowski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.