Literature DB >> 31857292

Cell Adhesiveness Serves as a Biophysical Marker for Metastatic Potential.

Pranjali Beri1, Anna Popravko1, Benjamin Yeoman1,2, Aditya Kumar1, Kevin Chen1, Enio Hodzic1, Alyssa Chiang1, Afsheen Banisadr3, Jesse K Placone1, Hannah Carter4,5, Stephanie I Fraley1,4, Parag Katira2,6, Adam J Engler7,3,8.   

Abstract

Tumors are heterogeneous and composed of cells with different dissemination abilities. Despite significant effort, there is no universal biological marker that serves as a metric for metastatic potential of solid tumors. Common to disseminating cells from such tumors, however, is the need to modulate their adhesion as they detach from the tumor and migrate through stroma to intravasate. Adhesion strength is heterogeneous even among cancer cells within a given population, and using a parallel plate flow chamber, we separated and sorted these populations into weakly and strongly adherent groups; when cultured under stromal conditions, this adhesion phenotype was stable over multiple days, sorting cycles, and common across all epithelial tumor lines investigated. Weakly adherent cells displayed increased migration in both two-dimensional and three-dimensional migration assays; this was maintained for several days in culture. Subpopulations did not show differences in expression of proteins involved in the focal adhesion complex but did exhibit intrinsic focal adhesion assembly as well as contractile differences that resulted from differential expression of genes involved in microtubules, cytoskeleton linkages, and motor activity. In human breast tumors, expression of genes associated with the weakly adherent population resulted in worse progression-free and disease-free intervals. These data suggest that adhesion strength could potentially serve as a stable marker for migration and metastatic potential within a given tumor population and that the fraction of weakly adherent cells present within a tumor could act as a physical marker for metastatic potential. SIGNIFICANCE: Cancer cells exhibit heterogeneity in adhesivity, which can be used to predict metastatic potential. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31857292      PMCID: PMC7024658          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-1794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  49 in total

1.  Hydrodynamic stretching of single cells for large population mechanical phenotyping.

Authors:  Daniel R Gossett; Henry T K Tse; Serena A Lee; Yong Ying; Anne G Lindgren; Otto O Yang; Jianyu Rao; Amander T Clark; Dino Di Carlo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  v-Src's hold over actin and cell adhesions.

Authors:  Margaret C Frame; Valerie J Fincham; Neil O Carragher; John A Wyke
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  Metastatic State of Cancer Cells May Be Indicated by Adhesion Strength.

Authors:  Alexander Fuhrmann; Afsheen Banisadr; Pranjali Beri; Thea D Tlsty; Adam J Engler
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  MCF-10AT: A Model for Human Breast Cancer Development.

Authors:  Gloria H. Heppner; Sandra R. Wolman
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Single cell adhesion measuring apparatus (SCAMA): application to cancer cell lines of different metastatic potential and voltage-gated Na+ channel expression.

Authors:  Christopher P Palmer; Maria E Mycielska; Hakan Burcu; Kareem Osman; Timothy Collins; Rachel Beckerman; Rebecca Perrett; Helen Johnson; Ebru Aydar; Mustafa B A Djamgoz
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 1.733

Review 6.  Targeting metastasis.

Authors:  Patricia S Steeg
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Paul Theodor Pyl; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  KIF14 negatively regulates Rap1a-Radil signaling during breast cancer progression.

Authors:  Syed M Ahmed; Brigitte L Thériault; Maruti Uppalapati; Catherine W N Chiu; Brenda L Gallie; Sachdev S Sidhu; Stéphane Angers
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Cation type specific cell remodeling regulates attachment strength.

Authors:  Alexander Fuhrmann; Julie Li; Shu Chien; Adam J Engler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of KIF14 overexpression in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Brigitte L Thériault; Halesha D Basavarajappa; Harvey Lim; Sanja Pajovic; Brenda L Gallie; Timothy W Corson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

1.  A frugal microfluidic pump.

Authors:  Apresio K Fajrial; Adam Vega; Gazendra Shakya; Xiaoyun Ding
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 6.799

2.  A constriction channel analysis of astrocytoma stiffness and disease progression.

Authors:  P M Graybill; R K Bollineni; Z Sheng; R V Davalos; R Mirzaeifar
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Phenotypic Heterogeneity and Metastasis of Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Lauren A Hapach; Shawn P Carey; Samantha C Schwager; Paul V Taufalele; Wenjun Wang; Jenna A Mosier; Nerymar Ortiz-Otero; Tanner J McArdle; Zachary E Goldblatt; Marsha C Lampi; Francois Bordeleau; Jocelyn R Marshall; Isaac M Richardson; Jiahe Li; Michael R King; Cynthia A Reinhart-King
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 13.312

Review 4.  Engineered ECM models: Opportunities to advance understanding of tumor heterogeneity.

Authors:  Adrian A Shimpi; Claudia Fischbach
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 8.386

5.  Phenotypically supervised single-cell sequencing parses within-cell-type heterogeneity.

Authors:  Kevin Chen; Kivilcim Ozturk; Ryne L Contreras; Jessica Simon; Sean McCann; Wei Ji Chen; Hannah Carter; Stephanie I Fraley
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2020-12-26

Review 6.  The Cancer Microenvironment: Mechanical Challenges of the Metastatic Cascade.

Authors:  Sebastian E Amos; Yu Suk Choi
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-02-12

7.  EGFRvIII uses intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms to reduce glioma adhesion and increase migration.

Authors:  Afsheen Banisadr; Mariam Eick; Pranjali Beri; Alison D Parisian; Benjamin Yeoman; Jesse K Placone; Adam J Engler; Frank Furnari
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  A phenotypically supervised single-cell analysis protocol to study within-cell-type heterogeneity of cultured mammalian cells.

Authors:  Kevin Chen; Kivilcim Ozturk; Ted Liefeld; Michael Reich; Jill P Mesirov; Hannah Carter; Stephanie I Fraley
Journal:  STAR Protoc       Date:  2021-05-25

Review 9.  Computational models of migration modes improve our understanding of metastasis.

Authors:  Gabriel Shatkin; Benjamin Yeoman; Katherine Birmingham; Parag Katira; Adam J Engler
Journal:  APL Bioeng       Date:  2020-11-05

10.  WGCNA reveals key gene modules regulated by the combined treatment of colon cancer with PHY906 and CPT11.

Authors:  Shuqin Xing; Yafei Wang; Kaiwen Hu; Fen Wang; Tao Sun; Quanwang Li
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.