Literature DB >> 31857044

Computed Tomography-Guided Risk Assessment in Percutaneous Lead Extraction.

Emma Svennberg1, Kathleen Jacobs2, Elliot McVeigh3, Victor Pretorius4, Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess if pre-procedural computed tomography (CT) could identify high-risk operative features and predict increased procedural complexity.
BACKGROUND: Unpredictable lead adhesions can make lead extraction complicated. Adhesions are known to affect leads with longer indwelling time but can unpredictably affect newer leads.
METHODS: Consecutive patients who had CTs performed ≤90 days before their planned lead extraction (LE) were included. CTs were reviewed blinded to outcome according to a preset checklist. The outcome was a combined endpoint of procedural complexity and major complications.
RESULTS: Between January 1, 2015 and July 1, 2018, 143 patients underwent CT and LE. Median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 54.4 to 76.5), and 35% were female. Median age of extracted leads was 111 months, and 126 (43%) were >10 years. CT detected lead perforation ≥5 mm (n = 13), <5 mm (n = 55), severe lead adhesions (n = 65), leads touching vessel wall >1 cm (n = 102), lead fracture (n = 8), and severe ipsilateral venous stenosis/occlusion (n = 36). The procedure was complex in 63 cases. There were 2 deaths, and 6 major complications. Patients with severe lead adhesions had more complex procedures (n = 36 vs 29; p = 0.04), whereas none of the other findings on CT were significantly associated with worse outcome. In patients with leads that had an indwelling time <10 years (n = 72), severe lead adhesions on CT was associated with worse outcome in multivariable analysis (odds ratio: 6.4; 95% confidence interval: 1.4 to 30.2; p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Pre-procedural CT can be used to locate severe lead adhesions in patients planned for lead extraction. In patients with indwelling leads <10 years, pre-procedural CT aids in identifying patients prone to complex extractions.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac implantable electrical devices; computed tomography; percutaneous extraction; preprocedural imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31857044      PMCID: PMC7718020          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 2405-500X


  7 in total

Review 1.  Extraction of transvenous pacing and ICD leads.

Authors:  Macy C Smith; Charles J Love
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Use of Preprocedural MDCT for Cardiac Implantable Electric Device Lead Extraction: Frequency of Findings That Change Management.

Authors:  Wendy L Ehieli; Daniel T Boll; Daniele Marin; Robert Lewis; Jonathan P Piccini; Lynne M Hurwitz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction.

Authors:  Fred M Kusumoto; Mark H Schoenfeld; Bruce L Wilkoff; Charles I Berul; Ulrika M Birgersdotter-Green; Roger Carrillo; Yong-Mei Cha; Jude Clancy; Jean-Claude Deharo; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Derek Exner; Ayman A Hussein; Charles Kennergren; Andrew Krahn; Richard Lee; Charles J Love; Ruth A Madden; Hector Alfredo Mazzetti; JoEllyn Carol Moore; Jeffrey Parsonnet; Kristen K Patton; Marc A Rozner; Kimberly A Selzman; Morio Shoda; Komandoor Srivathsan; Neil F Strathmore; Charles D Swerdlow; Christine Tompkins; Oussama Wazni
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 4.  Extraction of implantable cardiac electronic devices.

Authors:  John Rickard; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Navigation of lead extraction-is it possible? Impact of preprocedural electrocardiogram-triggered computed tomography on navigation of lead extraction.

Authors:  Julia Vogler; Simon Pecha; Ryan Azarrafiy; Liesa Castro; Florian Deuschl; Clemens Spink; Matthias Linder; Ulrike von Hehn; Stephan Willems; Hermann Reichenspurner; Nils Gosau; Samer Hakmi
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Preprocedural ECG-gated computed tomography for prevention of complications during lead extraction.

Authors:  Robert K Lewis; Sean D Pokorney; Ruth Ann Greenfield; Patrick M Hranitzky; Donald D Hegland; Jacob N Schroder; Shu S Lin; Carmelo Milano; James P Daubert; Peter K Smith; Lynne M Hurwitz; Jonathan P Piccini
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  A 15-year experience with permanent pacemaker and defibrillator lead and patch extractions.

Authors:  Alexander Rusanov; Henry M Spotnitz
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.330

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Gradual rise in lead impedance - A "rocky" course.

Authors:  Naga Venkata K Pothineni; Robert D Schaller
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2021-09-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.