| Literature DB >> 31856539 |
Nawazish Shaikh1, Vinod Kumar1, Nitesh Salunkhe1, Shreya Nayak1, Shoryavardhan Azad1.
Abstract
Macular hole in the pediatric age group is usually post-traumatic unlike, the adult counterpart. Herein we describe a case of idiopathic macular hole occurring in a 9-year-old male who presented to us with complaints of diminution of vision in OD (oculus dextrus) for 2 months. The child underwent 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. On follow-up his best-corrected visual acuity improved with type 1 closure of macular hole.Entities:
Keywords: Macular hole; nontraumatic macular hole; pediatric idiopathic macular hole
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31856539 PMCID: PMC6951201 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_354_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol ISSN: 0301-4738 Impact factor: 1.848
Figure 1Colour fundus photograph of OD showing the presence of a full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) with regular margins and no posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) (a). Swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) confirmed the FTMH with cystoid changes at the edges and no PVD (b). Colour fundus photograph of OS showing normal foveal reflex (c) and SS-OCT showing normal foveal contour (d)
Figure 2Ultra-wide field fundus image of OD showing no peripheral lesion (a). Ultra-wide field fluorescein angiography showing central hyperfluorescence (window defect) corresponding to the macular hole in OD (b). Ultra-Wide field fundus image (c) and Fluorescein angiography of OS (d) was unremarkable
Figure 3Postoperative week 1 colour photo and SS-OCT of OD showing type 1 closure of the macular hole with the discontinuous ellipsoid zone (a and b). Postoperative month 2 colour photo and SS-OCT showing a small residual defect in the ellipsoid zone and dissociated nerve fibre layer (c and d)
Figure 4Postoperative year 2 colour photo and SS-OCT showing type 1 macular hole closure with the restoration of the ellipsoid zone with a deep foveal contour (a and b)
Review of literature on cases of Idiopathic macular hole in pediatric age group
| Author, Year | Nakano | Manayath | Lim | Our case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at presentation (in years)/Gender | 10/F | 8/M | 10/F | 9/M |
| Duration of symptoms | 3 days | 2 weeks | Not mentioned | 2 months |
| Observation period | 1 month | 2 months | None | None |
| Initial vision at presentation and Fall in vision on observation | 20/30 to 20/120 | 20/80 to 20/200 | No Observation | No observation |
| Fundus findings | FTMH | FTMH | FTMH | FTMH |
| Hole size | Not reported | Not reported | 365 microns | 507 microns |
| Surgery | PPV with ICG assisted | PPV with BBG assisted | PPV with BBG assisted | PPV with BBG assisted |
| Intra-op | Fibrous membrane removed - Tightly adhered | Abnormally tight vitreoretinal adherence | Induction of PVD easy | Induction of PVD routine |
| Outcome | Macular hole closed | Macular hole closed | Macular hole closed | Macular hole closed |
| Follow-up period | 15 months | 6 months | 4 months | 2 years |
| Final visual outcome | 20/60 | 20/60 | 20/20 | 20/40 |
| Proposed pathogenesis | Contraction of peripapillary fibrous membrane due to incomplete regression of Bergmeister papillae | Abnormally tight vitreoretinal adhesion in mid peripheral region causing tangential traction over the fovea resulting in development of FTMH | Truly idiopathic | Truly idiopathic |