Literature DB >> 31856539

Pediatric idiopathic macular hole - A case report and review of literature.

Nawazish Shaikh1, Vinod Kumar1, Nitesh Salunkhe1, Shreya Nayak1, Shoryavardhan Azad1.   

Abstract

Macular hole in the pediatric age group is usually post-traumatic unlike, the adult counterpart. Herein we describe a case of idiopathic macular hole occurring in a 9-year-old male who presented to us with complaints of diminution of vision in OD (oculus dextrus) for 2 months. The child underwent 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. On follow-up his best-corrected visual acuity improved with type 1 closure of macular hole.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Macular hole; nontraumatic macular hole; pediatric idiopathic macular hole

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31856539      PMCID: PMC6951201          DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_354_19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0301-4738            Impact factor:   1.848


A macular hole is a full-thickness defect in the foveal center with variable prevalence. Incidence of macular hole in adult population was 3.3 per 1000 in the Baltimore Eye study[1] Macular holes may be primary or secondary. Most macular holes are primary due to abnormal vitreomacular traction. Idiopathic macular holes commonly occur in the 6th–7th decade of life.[2] Macular hole in a young patient is rare and is usually associated with blunt trauma.[3] Moreover, causes of nontraumatic macular hole in a young patient may be related to Coats disease,[45] retinal dystrophies and degenerations[67] like retinitis pigmentosa, X-Linked retinoschisis and Best disease, retinopathy of prematurity,[8] Bartonella neuroretinitis,[91011] Juvenile idiopathic epiretinal membrane,[12] incompletely regressed Bergmeister papilla,[13] laser injury,[14] choroidal coloboma,[15] and Idiopathic cavitary maculopathy.[16] Idiopathic macular hole in a young patient has only been reported infrequently in the literature. We hereby report a case of idiopathic macular hole in a 9-year-old boy, who underwent successful 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and also review the existing literature.

Case Report

A 9-year-old boy presented with diminution of vision in OD (oculus dextrus) of 2 months duration. The child was brought to our centre by his father who was a reliable informant and further history was elicited by both the father and the child. There was no history of trauma or night blindness. Birth history, family history, and systemic history were insignificant. The child was emmetrope and his best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/120 and 20/20 in OD and OS (oculus sinister) respectively. Slit-lamp examination revealed anterior chamber to be unremarkable in oculus uterque (OU) with no signs of trauma or inflammation. In particular, there was an absence of anisocoria, sphincteric tear, iridodialysis, angle recession, and lens subluxation. There were no other objective signs of trauma. Intraocular pressure was 14 and 16 mm of mercury in OD and OS respectively. Dilated fundus examination of OD [Fig. 1a] revealed a full thickness macular hole [FTMH, arrow Fig. 1a] with regular margins, cuff of fluid, and no posterior vitreous detachment (PVD). There were no signs of trauma, inflammation, or retinal dystrophy. Optic disc was normal and symmetric in appearance, there were no retinal pigment epithelial changes and no peripheral dialysis or tear. Fundus of OS was unremarkable [Fig. 1c].
Figure 1

Colour fundus photograph of OD showing the presence of a full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) with regular margins and no posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) (a). Swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) confirmed the FTMH with cystoid changes at the edges and no PVD (b). Colour fundus photograph of OS showing normal foveal reflex (c) and SS-OCT showing normal foveal contour (d)

Colour fundus photograph of OD showing the presence of a full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) with regular margins and no posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) (a). Swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) confirmed the FTMH with cystoid changes at the edges and no PVD (b). Colour fundus photograph of OS showing normal foveal reflex (c) and SS-OCT showing normal foveal contour (d) The child was co-operative for investigations. Swept-source optical coherence tomography of OD [SSOCT, Fig. 1b] confirmed the presence of an FTMH (with minimal hole diameter of 507 microns) with cystoid changes at the edges. No vitreomacular traction or posterior vitreous detachment was noted. OS SS-OCT was normal [Fig. 1d]. Ultra-wide field fluorescein angiography revealed [Fig. 2a] hyperfluorescence (window defect) corresponding to the macular hole in OD [Fig. 2b]. No peripheral abnormalities were found on fluorescein angiography, which could have contributed towards formation of macular hole. OS was normal on ultra-wide-field imaging [Fig. 2c and d] Based on clinical picture, a diagnosis of OD idiopathic macular hole was made.
Figure 2

Ultra-wide field fundus image of OD showing no peripheral lesion (a). Ultra-wide field fluorescein angiography showing central hyperfluorescence (window defect) corresponding to the macular hole in OD (b). Ultra-Wide field fundus image (c) and Fluorescein angiography of OS (d) was unremarkable

Ultra-wide field fundus image of OD showing no peripheral lesion (a). Ultra-wide field fluorescein angiography showing central hyperfluorescence (window defect) corresponding to the macular hole in OD (b). Ultra-Wide field fundus image (c) and Fluorescein angiography of OS (d) was unremarkable Following a written informed consent from the parents, the patient underwent 25-gauge PPV under general anesthesia. After core vitrectomy, triamcinolone assisted posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) was done. PVD induction was routine for the patient's age and was followed by Brilliant blue dye assisted ILM peeling. Fluid air exchange and tamponade with 25% sulfur hexafluoride were done. Postoperatively, the child was advised facedown position for 2 days. At postoperative week one, BCVA was 20/60 and hole had closed [Fig. 3a]. SSOCT showed type 1 hole closure, while ellipsoid zone was discontinuous [Fig. 3b]. BCVA improved to 20/40 at 2 months and SSOCT showed small defect of ellipsoid zone [Fig. 3c and d]. In addition, dissociated nerve fibre layer was seen. The clinical picture was maintained at 2 years follow up [Fig. 4] with the fellow eye showing no FTMH either. The patient was advised regular follow up.
Figure 3

Postoperative week 1 colour photo and SS-OCT of OD showing type 1 closure of the macular hole with the discontinuous ellipsoid zone (a and b). Postoperative month 2 colour photo and SS-OCT showing a small residual defect in the ellipsoid zone and dissociated nerve fibre layer (c and d)

Figure 4

Postoperative year 2 colour photo and SS-OCT showing type 1 macular hole closure with the restoration of the ellipsoid zone with a deep foveal contour (a and b)

Postoperative week 1 colour photo and SS-OCT of OD showing type 1 closure of the macular hole with the discontinuous ellipsoid zone (a and b). Postoperative month 2 colour photo and SS-OCT showing a small residual defect in the ellipsoid zone and dissociated nerve fibre layer (c and d) Postoperative year 2 colour photo and SS-OCT showing type 1 macular hole closure with the restoration of the ellipsoid zone with a deep foveal contour (a and b)

Discussion

Macular holes in the pediatric age group are usually secondary to blunt trauma.[3] Truly idiopathic macular holes in the pediatric age group are extremely rare. On extensive research using the keywords Idiopathic macular hole or pediatric macular hole in PubMed, we came up with 18 pediatric eyes with a nontraumatic macular hole of which 15 had a secondary nontraumatic cause. Only three pediatric eyes satisfied the diagnosis of idiopathic macular hole. In each case, a surgical closure was attempted with the outcome of the macular hole being closed in the postoperative period. A summary of all such cases with relevant findings and final outcomes are listed in Table 1.
Table 1

Review of literature on cases of Idiopathic macular hole in pediatric age group

Author, YearNakano et al.[13] 2005Manayath et al.[17] 2018Lim et al.[18] 2018Our case
Age at presentation (in years)/Gender10/F8/M10/F9/M
Duration of symptoms3 days2 weeksNot mentioned2 months
Observation period1 month2 monthsNoneNone
Initial vision at presentation and Fall in vision on observation20/30 to 20/12020/80 to 20/200No ObservationAt presentation 20/60No observationAt Presentation 20/120
Fundus findingsFTMHFibrous membrane on superior peripapillary retinaNo peripheral lesionFTMHNo PVD/VMA/ERM,No RPE changesNo peripheral lesionFTMHNo PVD/VMA/ERM,No RPE changesNo peripheral lesionFTMHNo PVD/VMA/ERM,No RPE changesNo peripheral lesion
Hole sizeNot reportedNot reported365 microns507 microns
SurgeryPPV with ICG assistedILM peeling with 20%SF6 TamponadePPV with BBG assistedILM peeling with 20% C3F8 tamponadePPV with BBG assistedILM peeling with 26%SF6 tamponadePPV with BBG assistedILM peeling with 25%SF6 tamponade
Intra-opFibrous membrane removed - Tightly adheredAbnormally tight vitreoretinal adherencePVD just beyond vascular arcadesInduction of PVD easyInduction of PVD routine
OutcomeMacular hole closedMild atrophic changes of RPEMacular hole closedMild Foveal thinning with ellipsoid zone discontinuityMacular hole closedSmall defect at photoreceptor levelMacular hole closedComplete restoration of ellipsoid zone
Follow-up period15 months6 months4 months2 years
Final visual outcome20/6020/6020/2020/40
Proposed pathogenesisContraction of peripapillary fibrous membrane due to incomplete regression of Bergmeister papillaeAbnormally tight vitreoretinal adhesion in mid peripheral region causing tangential traction over the fovea resulting in development of FTMHTruly idiopathicTruly idiopathic
Review of literature on cases of Idiopathic macular hole in pediatric age group The review of literature reveals that only one truly idiopathic case of a pediatric macular hole has been previously reported. Our case adds to the existing literature on an idiopathic macular hole in the pediatric age group and allows us the advantage of having a long-term follow-up for the patient. Proposed mechanism of hole formation in this child remains truly an enigma with our proposed hypothesis being a congenital abnormality in the development of the fovea In cases of traumatic macular hole, spontaneous closure[19] may occur. The child in our case had presented at the cusp of amblyogenic age. Hence an early intervention in the form of surgery was offered that resulted in good outcome. Early surgery although addresses the problem of amblyopia, has its own pitfalls as PVD induction in the young may be challenging. Inadvertent iatrogenic retinal tears, vitreous haemorrhage, and cataract formation are the other major adverse effects of surgery.

Conclusion

To conclude, idiopathic macular holes in the pediatric age group are extremely rare. Observation of up to 2 months showed no benefit in the previously published reports. An option of early surgery could be considered following adequate discussion with the parents regarding the pitfalls of both observation and surgery.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  18 in total

1.  Idiopathic macular hole in a child.

Authors:  J C Park; K N Frimpong-Ansah
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Macular hole following Bartonella henselae neuroretinitis.

Authors:  A Donnio; A Jean-Charles; H Merle
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.597

3.  Comparison of full-thickness traumatic macular holes and idiopathic macular holes by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jingjing Huang; Xing Liu; Ziqiang Wu; Srinivas Sadda
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Spontaneous closure of traumatic macular hole.

Authors:  Takehiro Yamashita; Akinori Uemara; Eisuke Uchino; Norihito Doi; Norio Ohba
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Full-thickness macular hole and macular telangiectasia in a child with Coats' disease.

Authors:  Vinod Kumar; Neha Goel; Basudeb Ghosh; Usha Kaul Raina
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2010-12-30

6.  Bilateral macular hole formation in a patient with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  P Kumar Rao; Gaurav Shah; Kevin J Blinder
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr

7.  The cause-specific prevalence of visual impairment in an urban population. The Baltimore Eye Survey.

Authors:  B Rahmani; J M Tielsch; J Katz; J Gottsch; H Quigley; J Javitt; A Sommer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Accidental Nd:YAG laser-induced macular hole in a pediatric patient.

Authors:  Maria Paula Fernandez; Yasha S Modi; Vishak J John; Audina M Berrocal
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 1.300

9.  Macular hole formation in patients with retinitis pigmentosa and prognosis of pars plana vitrectomy.

Authors:  Zi-Bing Jin; De-Kang Gan; Ge-Zhi Xu; Nobuhisa Nao-I
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.256

10.  Full-thickness macular hole in Bartonella henselae neuroretinitis in an 11-year-old girl.

Authors:  Anisha Seth; Usha K Raina; Sriram Thirumalai; Supriya Batta; Basudeb Ghosh
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015 Jan-Apr
View more
  1 in total

1.  Full-thickness Idiopathic Macular Hole in an Adolescent Male.

Authors:  Sebastian Derham; Riyaz Bhikoo
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.