Literature DB >> 31856301

Geometric distortion characterization and correction for the 1.0 T Australian MRI-linac system using an inverse electromagnetic method.

Shanshan Shan1, Gary P Liney2,3,4,5, Fangfang Tang1, Mingyan Li1, Yaohui Wang6, Huan Ma7, Ewald Weber1, Amy Walker2,3,4,5, Lois Holloway2,3,4,5,8, Qiuliang Wang6, Deming Wang1, Feng Liu1, Stuart Crozier1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-Linac system combines a MRI scanner and a linear accelerator (Linac) to realize real-time localization and adaptive radiotherapy for tumors. Given that the Australian MRI-Linac system has a 30-cm diameter of spherical volume (DSV) with a shimmed homogeneity of ±4.05 parts per million (ppm), a gradient nonlinearity (GNL) of <5% can only be assured within 15 cm from the system's isocenter. GNL increases from the isocenter and escalates close to and outside of the edge of the DSV. Gradient nonlinearity can cause large geometric distortions, which may provide inaccurate tumor localization and potentially degrade the radiotherapy treatment. In this study, we aimed to characterize and correct the geometric distortions both inside and outside of the DSV.
METHODS: On the basis of phantom measurements, an inverse electromagnetic (EM) method was developed to reconstitute the virtual current density distribution that could generate gradient fields. The obtained virtual EM source was capable of characterizing the GNL field both inside and outside of the DSV. With the use of this GNL field information, our recently developed "GNL-encoding" reconstruction method was applied to correct the distortions implemented in the k-space domain.
RESULTS: Both phantom and in vivo human images were used to validate the proposed method. The results showed that the maximal displacements within an imaging volume of 30 cm × 30 cm × 30 cm after using the fifth-order spherical harmonic (SH) method and the proposed method were 6.1 ± 0.6 mm and 1.8 ± 0.6 mm, respectively. Compared with the fifth-order SH-based method, the new solution decreased the percentage of markers (within an imaging volume of 30 cm × 30 cm × 30 cm) with ≥1.5-mm distortions from 6.3% to 1.3%, indicating substantially improved geometric accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: The experimental results indicated that the proposed method could provide substantially improved geometric accuracy for the region outside of the DSV, when comparing with the fifth-order SH-based method.
© 2019 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GNL; MRI-Linac; geometric distortion; inverse electromagnetic; radiotherapy treatment

Year:  2020        PMID: 31856301     DOI: 10.1002/mp.13979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  4 in total

Review 1.  The future of MRI in radiation therapy: Challenges and opportunities for the MR community.

Authors:  Rosie J Goodburn; Marielle E P Philippens; Thierry L Lefebvre; Aly Khalifa; Tom Bruijnen; Joshua N Freedman; David E J Waddington; Eyesha Younus; Eric Aliotta; Gabriele Meliadò; Teo Stanescu; Wajiha Bano; Ali Fatemi-Ardekani; Andreas Wetscherek; Uwe Oelfke; Nico van den Berg; Ralph P Mason; Petra J van Houdt; James M Balter; Oliver J Gurney-Champion
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.737

Review 2.  Integrated MRI-guided radiotherapy - opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Paul J Keall; Caterina Brighi; Carri Glide-Hurst; Gary Liney; Paul Z Y Liu; Suzanne Lydiard; Chiara Paganelli; Trang Pham; Shanshan Shan; Alison C Tree; Uulke A van der Heide; David E J Waddington; Brendan Whelan
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 65.011

3.  Imaging performance of a high-field in-line magnetic resonance imaging linear accelerator with a patient rotation system for fixed-gantry radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jarryd G Buckley; Bin Dong; Gary P Liney
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-11-18

4.  Characterizing magnetically focused contamination electrons by off-axis irradiation on an inline MRI-Linac.

Authors:  Elizabeth Patterson; Bradley M Oborn; Dean Cutajar; Urszula Jelen; Gary Liney; Anatoly B Rosenfeld; Peter E Metcalfe
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 2.243

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.