STUDY OBJECTIVES: Previous research has reported mixed results in terms of sex differences in sleep quality. We conducted an analysis of measurement invariance of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) between men and women to provide a necessary foundation for examining sleep differences. METHODS: The sample included 861 adults (mean age = 52.73 years, 47.85% male) from the 2012-2016 wave of the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) Refresher Biomarker survey. We randomly divided the sample into two half samples for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), respectively. We conducted EFA with a weighted least squares mean and variance adjusted (WLSMV) estimator and Geomin rotation to explore the underlying structure of the PSQI. We then employed multiple-group CFA with the WLSMV estimator and theta parameterization to examine measurement invariance between males and females. RESULTS: EFA suggested a two-factor structure of the PSQI, and the two-factor CFA model fit the data well. The finding that the two-factor PSQI model was invariant between males and females on configuration, factor loadings, thresholds for all but one measure, and residual variances for all but one measure provided evidence that the two-factor PSQI model was partially invariant between men and women. Females had higher means on latent factors, suggesting worse self-reports of sleep among women. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the measure of the PSQI assesses the same factors in a comparable way among men and women. Women reported worse sleep than men.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Previous research has reported mixed results in terms of sex differences in sleep quality. We conducted an analysis of measurement invariance of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) between men and women to provide a necessary foundation for examining sleep differences. METHODS: The sample included 861 adults (mean age = 52.73 years, 47.85% male) from the 2012-2016 wave of the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) Refresher Biomarker survey. We randomly divided the sample into two half samples for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), respectively. We conducted EFA with a weighted least squares mean and variance adjusted (WLSMV) estimator and Geomin rotation to explore the underlying structure of the PSQI. We then employed multiple-group CFA with the WLSMV estimator and theta parameterization to examine measurement invariance between males and females. RESULTS: EFA suggested a two-factor structure of the PSQI, and the two-factor CFA model fit the data well. The finding that the two-factor PSQI model was invariant between males and females on configuration, factor loadings, thresholds for all but one measure, and residual variances for all but one measure provided evidence that the two-factor PSQI model was partially invariant between men and women. Females had higher means on latent factors, suggesting worse self-reports of sleep among women. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the measure of the PSQI assesses the same factors in a comparable way among men and women. Women reported worse sleep than men.
Authors: Jeanne F Duffy; Sean W Cain; Anne-Marie Chang; Andrew J K Phillips; Mirjam Y Münch; Claude Gronfier; James K Wyatt; Derk-Jan Dijk; Kenneth P Wright; Charles A Czeisler Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-05-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Hyong Jin Cho; Helen Lavretsky; Richard Olmstead; Myron J Levin; Michael N Oxman; Michael R Irwin Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2008-09-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Bizu Gelaye; Vitool Lohsoonthorn; Somrat Lertmeharit; Wipawan C Pensuksan; Sixto E Sanchez; Seblewengel Lemma; Yemane Berhane; Xiaotong Zhu; Juan Carlos Vélez; Clarita Barbosa; Asterio Anderade; Mahlet G Tadesse; Michelle A Williams Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-12-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Denisa Manková; Daniela Dudysová; Jan Novák; Eva Fárková; Karolina Janků; Monika Kliková; Jitka Bušková; Aleš Bartoš; Karel Šonka; Jana Kopřivová Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2021-08-10 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Katherine L McPherson; Dardo G Tomasi; Gene-Jack Wang; Peter Manza; Nora D Volkow Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Yanxu Yang; Yendelela L Cuffee; Betsy B Aumiller; Kathryn Schmitz; David M Almeida; Vernon M Chinchilli Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2022-02-21
Authors: Ana Jerković; Una Mikac; Meri Matijaca; Vana Košta; Ana Ćurković Katić; Krešimir Dolić; Igor Vujović; Joško Šoda; Zoran Đogaš; Sanda Pavelin; Maja Rogić Vidaković Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-04-05 Impact factor: 4.241