Literature DB >> 31854480

Effects of bioenergy on biodiversity arising from land-use change and crop type.

Mauricio M Núñez-Regueiro1,2,3, Sharmin F Siddiqui4, Robert J Fletcher1.   

Abstract

Understanding how the world's flora and fauna will respond to bioenergy expansion is critical. This issue is particularly pronounced considering bioenergy's potential role as a driver of land-use change, the variety of production crops being considered and currently used for biomass, and the diversity of ecosystems that can potentially supply land for bioenergy across the planet. We conducted 2 global meta-analyses to determine how 8 of the most commonly used bioenergy crops may affect site-level biodiversity. One search was directed at finding data on biodiversity in different production land uses and the other at extracting energy-yield estimates of potential bioenergy crops. We used linear mixed-effect models to test whether effects on biodiversity varied with different individual bioenergy crop species, estimated energy yield, first- or second-generation crops, type of reference ecosystem considered, and magnitude of vertical change in habitat structure between any given crop and the reference ecosystem. Species diversity and abundance were generally lower in crops considered for bioenergy relative to the natural ecosystems they may replace. First-generation crops, derived from oils, sugars, and starches, tended to have greater effects than second-generation crops, derived from lignocellulose, woody crops, or residues. Crop yield had nonlinear effects on abundance and, to a lesser extent, overall biodiversity; biodiversity effects were driven by negative yield effects for birds but not other taxa. Our results emphasize that replacing natural ecosystems with bioenergy crops across the planet will largely be detrimental for biodiversity, with first generation and high-yield crops having the strongest negative effects. We argue that meeting energy goals with bioenergy using existing marginal lands or biomass extraction within existing production landscapes may provide more biodiversity-friendly alternatives than conversion of natural ecosystems for biofuel production.
© 2019 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amphibians; anfibios; aves; biocombustibles; biodiversidad; biodiversity; biofuels; birds; crops; cultivos; deforestación; deforestation; forest; grassland; mammals; mamíferos; pastizales; plantas; plants; reptiles; 两栖动物; 农作物; 哺乳动物; 森林; 森林砍伐; 植物; 爬行动物; 生物多样性; 生物燃料; 草原; 鸟类

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31854480     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  2 in total

1.  Global implications of crop-based bioenergy with carbon capture and storage for terrestrial vertebrate biodiversity.

Authors:  Steef V Hanssen; Zoran J N Steinmann; Vassilis Daioglou; Mirza Čengić; Detlef P Van Vuuren; Mark A J Huijbregts
Journal:  Glob Change Biol Bioenergy       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 5.957

Review 2.  Recent advances in green technology and Industrial Revolution 4.0 for a sustainable future.

Authors:  Pragya Bradu; Antara Biswas; Chandralekha Nair; Salini Sreevalsakumar; Megha Patil; Sandra Kannampuzha; Anirban Goutam Mukherjee; Uddesh Ramesh Wanjari; Kaviyarasi Renu; Balachandar Vellingiri; Abilash Valsala Gopalakrishnan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 5.190

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.