| Literature DB >> 31853825 |
Nahuel González-Schain1, Irma Roig-Villanova2,3, Martin M Kater4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rice grain production is susceptible to a changing environment that imposes both biotic and abiotic stress conditions. Cold episodes are becoming more frequent in the last years and directly affect rice yield in areas with a temperate climate. Rice is particularly susceptible to cold stress during the reproductive phase, especially in anthers during post-meiotic stages which, in turn, affect pollen production. However, a number of rice cultivars with a certain degree of tolerance to cold have been described, which may represent a good breeding resource for improvement of susceptible commercial varieties. Plants experiencing cold stress activate a molecular response in order to reprogram many metabolic pathways to face these hostile conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Cold-stress; ERF; Microsporogenesis; Photosynthesis; RNA-seq; Rice; Spikelet fertility
Year: 2019 PMID: 31853825 PMCID: PMC6920279 DOI: 10.1186/s12284-019-0350-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rice (N Y) ISSN: 1939-8425 Impact factor: 4.783
Fig. 1Spikelet fertility in cold-stress tolerant and sensitive cultivars. Spikelet fertility as the percentage of filled/empty spikelets after grain maturation is shown. NB, Nipponbare. Bars represent mean ± SEM of at least two biological replicas. Asterisks indicate statistically different mean values compared with the control (Student’s t-test, p < 0.05)
Fig. 2Gene ontology enrichment analysis of RNA-seq datasets. (a) Venn diagrams showing shared deregulated genes from cold-stress RNA-seq datasets. The most representative GO accessions are shown for ERY and S.AND upregulated (b) and for S.AND downregulated (d) genes by cold stress. Backgrounds correspond to percent of genes from the whole genome belonging to each GO accession. The full list of statistically significant (FDR < 0.05) GO accessions enriched is listed in Additional file 6: Table S2. c, scatterplot of log2FC from deregulated transcription factors in cold-stress ERY and S.AND anthers. Black circles correspond to SSTF (statistically significant by two-fold) genes in both cultivars, while grey squares correspond to genes in only one cultivar
Fig. 3Venn diagram showing overlapped cold-stress deregulated genes in four anther datasets. Up- and downregulated genes from this work (G), (Suzuki et al. 2015) (S), (Bai et al. 2015) (B), and (Ishiguro et al. 2014) (I) were compared. Notice there are only 2 genes commonly deregulated in more than two studies
Fig. 4Overview of different pathways specifically deregulated in cold stress anthers. Specific up- and downregulated genes (red and blue, respectively) in cold-stress post-meiotic anthers from ERY and S.AND cultivars were analysed by Mapman software (Thimm et al. 2004)
Fig. 5Mapman analysis of cold-stress deregulated genes involved in photosynthesis. Specific up- and down-regulated genes (red and blue, respectively) in cold-stress post-meiotic anthers from ERY and S.AND cultivars were analysed by Mapman software (Thimm et al. 2004)
Cold-stress responses of ethylene metabolism-related genes in tolerant rice anthers. [this table should be added immediately before Discussion]
| LOCUS ID | Gene | RPKM (ERY CO) | RPKM (ERY CS) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOC_Os03g51740 | OsACS1 | 1.10 | 1.88 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os04g48850 | OsACS2 | 0.16 | 0.24 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os05g10780 | OsACS3 | 2.51 | 3.22 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os05g25490 | OsACS4 | 0.01 | 0.02 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os01g09700 | OsACS5 | 0.02 | 0.00 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os06g03990 | OsACS6 | 20.73 | 25.47 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os09g27820 | OsACO1 | 2.58 | 3.67 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os02g53180 | OsACO2a | 26.83 | 108.39 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os09g27750 | OsACO3 | 1.18 | 1.09 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os11g08380 | OsACO4a | 5.86 | 17.86 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os05g05680 | OsACO5 | 0.15 | 0.12 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os05g05670 | OsACO6 | 0.10 | 0.08 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os01g39860 | OsACO7 | 0.41 | 0.32 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os03g49500 | OsERS1 | 79.28 | 103.50 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os05g06320 | OsERS2 | 12.77 | 17.76 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os04g08740 | OsETR2 | 27.79 | 40.83 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os02g57530 | OsETR3 | 2.03 | 4.82 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os07g15540 | OsETR4 | 0.28 | 0.54 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os01g51430 | OsRTE1 | 14.80 | 11.03 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os05g46240 | OsRTE2a | 13.06 | 44.74 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os03g58520 | OsRTE3 | 22.40 | 26.74 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os02g32610 | OsCTR1 | 4.08 | 4.67 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os09g39320 | OsCTR2 | 17.38 | 26.22 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os04g52140 | OsCTR3 | 14.08 | 10.66 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os03g58060 | OsEIN5 | 39.04 | 42.93 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os06g40360 | OsEBF1a | 31.00 | 65.78 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os02g10700 | OsEBF2a | 85.29 | 189.51 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os07g06130 | OsEIN2 | 31.87 | 48.60 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os03g20780 | OsEIL1 | 0.77 | 4.21 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os07g48630 | OsEIL2a | 78.08 | 220.30 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os09g31400 | OsEIL3 | 23.82 | 33.25 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os08g39830 | OsEIL4 | 6.42 | 6.80 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os02g36510 | OsEIL5 | 0.32 | 0.07 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os04g38400 | OsEIL6 | 3.40 | 3.65 | Rzewuski and Sauter, |
| LOC_Os02g54160 | OsEREBP1 | 377.98 | 404.30 | Cheong et al., 2003 |
| LOC_Os03g08460 | OsEBP89 | 0.03 | 0.04 | Mao et al., 2006 |
| LOC_Os09g11460 | Sub1Ca | 4.46 | 16.20 | Fukao et al., |
| LOC_Os12g41060 | SK1/SK2 | 0.03 | 0.06 | Hattori et al., 2009 |
| LOC_Os09g28440 | OsEATB | 0.30 | 1.46 | Qi et al., 2011 |
| LOC_Os02g10760 | OsWR1 | 194.76 | 180.64 | Wang et al., 2012 |
| LOC_Os08g35240 | OsDERF1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | Wan et al., |
| LOC_Os01g58420 | OsERF3a | 70.93 | 284.72 | Wan et al., |
| LOC_Os04g52090 | OsAP2–39 | 98.69 | 225.31 | Wan et al., |
| LOC_Os04g46220 | OsERF1a | 4.60 | 25.86 | Hu et al., |
| LOC_Os02g45010 | OsbHLH076a | 9.36 | 21.93 | This work |
| LOC_Os07g28890 | OsbHLH077a | 14.40 | 41.89 | This work |
| LOC_Os07g22730 | OsERF136a | 0.19 | 4.11 | This work |
| LOC_Os03g08500 | OsERF64a | 265.10 | 1022.77 | This work |
| LOC_Os03g08490 | OsERF69a | 0.56 | 6.52 | This work |
| LOC_Os05g41780 | OsERF74a | 126.50 | 328.52 | This work |
| LOC_Os09g39850 | OsERF87a | 0.38 | 6.54 | This work |
| LOC_Os05g25260 | OsERF56a | 5.04 | 16.33 | This work |
| LOC_Os01g49830 | AP2/EREBP127a | 6.64 | 19.14 | This work |
| LOC_Os04g46440 | OsERF34a | 5.00 | 24.81 | This work |
| LOC_Os04g55520 | OsERF8a | 13.93 | 50.32 | This work |
| LOC_Os01g21120 | OsERF68a | 2.17 | 8.14 | This work |
| LOC_Os07g42510 | OsERF65a | 2.64 | 9.91 | This work |
a, SSTF genes from ERY RNA-seq datasets. CO and CS, control or cold-stress treated samples, respectively