Literature DB >> 31853812

Do changes in perfusion index reflect changes in stroke volume during preload-modifying manoeuvres?

Hugues de Courson1, Frédéric Michard2, Camille Chavignier1, Eric Verchère1, Karine Nouette-Gaulain1,3,4, Matthieu Biais5,6,7.   

Abstract

Changes in stroke volume (deltaSV) induced by a lung recruitment manoeuvre (LRM) have been shown to accurately predict fluid responsiveness during protective mechanical ventilation. Cardiac output monitors are used in a limited number of surgical patients. In contrast, all patients are monitored with a pulse oximeter, that may enable the continuous monitoring of a peripheral perfusion index (PI). We postulated that changes in PI (deltaPI) may reflect deltaSV during brief modifications of cardiac preload. We studied 47 patients undergoing neurosurgery and ventilated with a tidal volume of 6-8 ml/kg. All patients were monitored with a pulse contour system enabling the continuous monitoring of SV and with a pulse oximeter enabling the continuous monitoring of PI. LRMs were performed by increasing airway pressure up to 30 cmH20 for 30 s. Fluid loads (250 ml of saline 0.9% in 10 min) were performed only in patients who experienced a deltaSV > 30% during LRMs (potential fluid responders). LRMs induced a 26% decrease in SV (p < 0.05) and a 27% decrease in PI (p < 0.05). We observed a fair relationship between deltaPI and deltaSV (r2 = 0.34). A deltaPI ≥ 26% predicted a deltaSV > 30% with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 78%  (AUC  =  0.84, 95%CI 0.71-0.93). 24 patients experienced a deltaSV > 30% and subsequently received fluid. Fluid loads induced a 16% increase in SV and a 17% increase in PI, but fluid-induced deltaPI and deltaSV were weakly correlated (r2 = 0.19). In neurosurgical patients, we conclude that deltaPI may be used as a surrogate for deltaSV during LRMs but not during fluid loading.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac output; Fluid responsiveness; Lung recruitment manoeuvre; Perfusion index; Pulse oximeter

Year:  2019        PMID: 31853812     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00445-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  5 in total

Review 1.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What's new?

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Rui Shi; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 10.318

2.  COVID-19: Pulse oximeters in the spotlight.

Authors:  Frederic Michard; Kirk Shelley; Erwan L'Her
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 3.  Evaluation of fluid responsiveness during COVID-19 pandemic: what are the remaining choices?

Authors:  Ahmed Hasanin; Maha Mostafa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 4.  What is new in hemodynamic monitoring and management?

Authors:  Moritz Flick; Alina Bergholz; Pawel Sierzputowski; Simon T Vistisen; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 1.977

5.  Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness by the Effect of the Lung Recruitment Maneuver on the Perfusion Index in Mechanically Ventilated Patients During Surgery.

Authors:  Sunthiti Morakul; Naruemol Prachanpanich; Pattarada Permsakmesub; Pimwatana Pinsem; Wasineenart Mongkolpun; Konlawij Trongtrakul
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.