Literature DB >> 31853811

Automatic detection of reverse-triggering related asynchronies during mechanical ventilation in ARDS patients using flow and pressure signals.

Pablo O Rodriguez1,2, Norberto Tiribelli3, Emiliano Gogniat4, Gustavo A Plotnikow5, Sebastian Fredes3,6, Ignacio Fernandez Ceballos4, Romina A Pratto5, Matias Madorno7,8, Santiago Ilutovich6, Eduardo San Roman4, Ignacio Bonelli9,10, María Guaymas3, Alejandro C Raimondi11, Luis P Maskin9,10, Mariano Setten9,10,12.   

Abstract

Asynchrony due to reverse-triggering (RT) may appear in ARDS patients. The objective of this study is to validate an algorithm developed to detect these alterations in patient-ventilator interaction. We developed an algorithm that uses flow and airway pressure signals to classify breaths as normal, RT with or without breath stacking (BS) and patient initiated double-triggering (DT). The diagnostic performance of the algorithm was validated using two datasets of breaths, that are classified as stated above. The first dataset classification was based on visual inspection of esophageal pressure (Pes) signal from 699 breaths recorded from 11 ARDS patients. The other classification was obtained by vote of a group of 7 experts (2 physicians and 5 respiratory therapists, who were trained in ICU), who evaluated 1881 breaths gathered from recordings from 99 subjects. Experts used airway pressure and flow signals for breaths classification. The RT with or without BS represented 19% and 37% of breaths in Pes dataset while their frequency in the expert's dataset were 3% and 12%, respectively. The DT was very infrequent in both datasets. Algorithm classification accuracy was 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.94, P < 0.001) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.95-0.97, P < 0.001), in comparison with Pes and experts' opinion. Kappa statistics were 0.86 and 0.84, respectively. The algorithm precision, sensitivity and specificity for individual asynchronies were excellent. The algorithm yields an excellent accuracy for detecting clinically relevant asynchronies related to RT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARDS; Patient–ventilator interaction; Respiratory asynchrony; Reverse-triggering

Year:  2019        PMID: 31853811     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00444-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  5 in total

Review 1.  Reverse Triggering: An Introduction to Diagnosis, Management, and Pharmacologic Implications.

Authors:  Brian Murray; Andrea Sikora; Jason R Mock; Thomas Devlin; Kelli Keats; Rebecca Powell; Thomas Bice
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 5.988

2.  Risk Factors for Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony and Its Impact on Clinical Outcomes: Analytics Based on Deep Learning Algorithm.

Authors:  Huiqing Ge; Kailiang Duan; Jimei Wang; Liuqing Jiang; Lingwei Zhang; Yuhan Zhou; Luping Fang; Leo M A Heunks; Qing Pan; Zhongheng Zhang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-11-25

Review 3.  Accuracy of Algorithms and Visual Inspection for Detection of Trigger Asynchrony in Critical Patients : A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Monique Bandeira; Alícia Almeida; Lívia Melo; Pedro Henrique de Moura; Emanuelle Olympia Ribeiro Silva; Jakson Silva; Armèle Dornelas de Andrade; Daniella Brandão; Shirley Campos
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2021-09-28

4.  Reconstructing asynchrony for mechanical ventilation using a hysteresis loop virtual patient model.

Authors:  Cong Zhou; J Geoffrey Chase; Qianhui Sun; Jennifer Knopp; Merryn H Tawhai; Thomas Desaive; Knut Möller; Geoffrey M Shaw; Yeong Shiong Chiew; Balazs Benyo
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 5.  What is new in respiratory monitoring?

Authors:  Dan S Karbing; Steffen Leonhardt; Gaetano Perchiazzi; Jason H T Bates
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 1.977

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.