Lingxiao Chen1, Zhenyu Ou1, Ruizhe Wang1, Mengda Zhang1, Wei He1, Junjie Zhang1, Xiongbing Zu1, Lu Yi2, Ran Xu2, Shusuan Jiang3, Lin Qi1, Long Wang4. 1. Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China. 3. Department of Urology, Hunan Cancer Hospital and The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medical, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China. 4. Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China. wanglong@csu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for survival in high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a propensity score-based analysis was performed with high-grade UTUC patients from multiple urologic centers. METHODS: From three urologic centers, 48 high-grade UTUC patients who received chemotherapy followed by surgery (NAC group) and 72 high-grade UTUC patients who underwent initial surgery (no-NAC group) were involved in a propensity score-based analysis. After propensity score-based (1:1) matching, 37 patients receiving NAC and 37 patients not receiving NAC were followed. RESULTS: The patients who received NAC had improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), with a 3-year DFS rate of 78.4% and an OS rate of 86.5% versus a 3-year DFS rate of 51.4% and an OS rate of 62.2% for those treated with initial surgery (P = 0.018 and P = 0.02, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, the NAC group had a lower risk for mortality [DFS hazard ratio (HR) 0.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10-0.62; P = 0.003; OS HR 0.22; 95% CI 0.085-0.57; P = 0.002]. The analysis of patient survival in matched subgroups showed that NAC was beneficial in terms of the 3-year DFS for the group with a cT of 3 or higher (DFS HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.14-0.94; P = 0.036) and the group that had tumor with hydronephrosis (DFS HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.11-0.87; P = 0.026). CONCLUSION: The study showed that NAC may be considered as an effective addition to surgery for the treatment in high-grade UTUC patients.
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for survival in high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a propensity score-based analysis was performed with high-grade UTUCpatients from multiple urologic centers. METHODS: From three urologic centers, 48 high-grade UTUCpatients who received chemotherapy followed by surgery (NAC group) and 72 high-grade UTUCpatients who underwent initial surgery (no-NAC group) were involved in a propensity score-based analysis. After propensity score-based (1:1) matching, 37 patients receiving NAC and 37 patients not receiving NAC were followed. RESULTS: The patients who received NAC had improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), with a 3-year DFS rate of 78.4% and an OS rate of 86.5% versus a 3-year DFS rate of 51.4% and an OS rate of 62.2% for those treated with initial surgery (P = 0.018 and P = 0.02, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, the NAC group had a lower risk for mortality [DFS hazard ratio (HR) 0.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10-0.62; P = 0.003; OS HR 0.22; 95% CI 0.085-0.57; P = 0.002]. The analysis of patient survival in matched subgroups showed that NAC was beneficial in terms of the 3-year DFS for the group with a cT of 3 or higher (DFS HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.14-0.94; P = 0.036) and the group that had tumor with hydronephrosis (DFS HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.11-0.87; P = 0.026). CONCLUSION: The study showed that NAC may be considered as an effective addition to surgery for the treatment in high-grade UTUCpatients.