Literature DB >> 31853737

Imperfect but important: a fellow's perspective on journal peer review.

Natalie Neumann1.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Commentary; JMT fellow editor in training; Peer review

Mesh：

Year:  2019        PMID： 31853737      PMCID： PMC6942088          DOI： 10.1007/s13181-019-00751-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Toxicol        ISSN： 1556-9039


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Becoming a peer reviewer to medical education journals.

Authors:  Samy A Azer; Subha Ramani; Ray Peterson
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  Just Because It's Published Doesn't Mean It's Perfect: The Continuing Evolution of the Peer Review Process.

Authors:  George B Bartley; Thomas J Liesegang
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript.

Authors:  James M Provenzale; Robert J Stanley
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Guarding the guardians: a conference on editorial peer review.

Authors:  D Rennie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-11-07       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Maintaining the Public Trust in Journals with Ethical Publishing.

Authors:  Mark B Mycyk
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2017-11-06

6.  Making the First Cut: An Analysis of Academic Medicine Editors' Reasons for Not Sending Manuscripts Out for External Peer Review.

Authors:  Holly S Meyer; Steven J Durning; David P Sklar; Lauren A Maggio
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Any jackass can trash a manuscript, but it takes good scholarship to create one (how MBoC promotes civil and constructive peer review).

Authors:  David G Drubin
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 4.138
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.