| Literature DB >> 31853284 |
Tianwei Dong1, Hongbin Li2, Shuang Wang1, Weida Chen1.
Abstract
Serum galectin-3 (Gal-3) in patients with hypertension complicated with diastolic dysfunction and its predictive value for efficacy were investigated. One hundred patients with hypertension complicated with diastolic dysfunction admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University from June 2017 to December 2018 were enrolled as group A, symptomatically treated with conventional drugs. Further 80 individuals undergoing physical examination during the same period were enrolled as group B. Patients in the two groups were subjected to echocardiography to observe mitral valve early peak flow velocity (EPFV), atrial peak flow velocity (APFV), maximum flow velocity ratio of early to atrial diastole (EPFV/APFV) and peak mitral annulus velocity (E/E'). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect serum Gal-3 concentration. According to efficacy after treatment, patients in group A were divided into the effective group (71 patients) and the invalid group (29 patients). Gal-3 concentration in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (P<0.05). After treatment, the concentration in group A was significantly lower than that before treatment (P<0.05), but significantly higher than that in group B (P<0.05). Gal-3 concentration was significantly higher in patients with cardiac function grades II, III and IV than that in patients with grade I (P<0.05). According to Spearman's test, Gal-3 concentration was positively correlated with cardiac function grading (r=0.569, P<0.001). Compared with before treatment in group A, patients after treatment had significantly higher EPFV and EPFV/APFV (P<0.05), but significantly lower APFV and E/E' (P<0.05). Before treatment, Gal-3 concentration in the effective group was significantly lower than that in the invalid group (P<0.05). According to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under curve (AUC) of Gal-3 concentration for evaluating efficacy was 0.792, the sensitivity was 73.24%, and the specificity was 79.31%. In conclusion, Gal-3 may be involved in the development and progression of hypertension complicated with diastolic dysfunction. Its concentration increases with the rise of cardiac function grading but significantly decreases after treatment. Therefore, Gal-3 concentration before treatment can be used as a potential predictor of efficacy. Copyright: © Dong et al.Entities:
Keywords: clinical efficacy; galectin-3; hypertension complicated with diastolic dysfunction; predictive value
Year: 2019 PMID: 31853284 PMCID: PMC6909668 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.8215
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Comparison of general information [n (%)] (mean ± SD).
| Category | Group A (n=100) | Group B (n=80) | t/χ2 | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 0.364 | 0.547 | ||
| Male | 53 (53.00) | 46 (57.50) | ||
| Female | 47 (47.00) | 34 (42.50) | ||
| Age (years) | 63.57±10.38 | 60.69±10.67 | 1.827 | 0.069 |
| History of smoking | 0.190 | 0.663 | ||
| Yes | 57 (57.00) | 43 (53.75) | ||
| No | 43 (43.00) | 37 (46.25) | ||
| History of drinking | 0.251 | 0.616 | ||
| Yes | 55 (55.00) | 41 (51.25) | ||
| No | 45 (45.00) | 39 (48.75) | ||
| Place of residence | 0.641 | 0.423 | ||
| City | 67 (67.00) | 49 (61.25) | ||
| Countryside | 33 (33.00) | 31 (38.75) | ||
| Educational level | 0.818 | 0.366 | ||
| ≥University | 42 (42.00) | 39 (48.75) | ||
| <University | 58 (58.00) | 41 (51.25) | ||
| FBG (mmol/l) | 5.53±1.37 | 5.74±2.26 | 0.769 | 0.443 |
| Hb (g/l) | 116.58±10.85 | 119.57±13.53 | 1.646 | 0.102 |
| RBC (×1012/l) | 4.63±0.35 | 4.71±0.45 | 1.342 | 0.181 |
| PLT (×109/l) | 147.48±15.28 | 151.52±16.37 | 1.708 | 0.090 |
| AST (U/l) | 21.73±9.65 | 20.45±8.65 | 0.926 | 0.356 |
| ALT (U/l) | 19.42±8.26 | 17.35±9.41 | 1.570 | 0.118 |
| Uric acid (µmol/l) | 298.16±65.37 | 281.52±45.38 | 1.934 | 0.055 |
| Serum creatinine (µmol/l) | 79.13±14.16 | 75.61±12.59 | 1.740 | 0.084 |
| Cardiac function grading | ||||
| Grade I | 20 (20.00) | – | ||
| Grade II | 26 (26.00) | – | ||
| Grade III | 30 (30.00) | – | ||
| Grade IV | 24 (24.00) | – | ||
FBG, fasting blood glucose; Hb, hemoglobin; RBC, red blood cell count; PLT, platelet count; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase.
Figure 1.Comparison of serum Gal-3 concentration before and after treatment between group A and group B. According to ELISA, serum Gal-3 concentration in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (P<0.05). After treatment, the concentration in group A was significantly lower than that before treatment (P<0.05), but significantly higher than that in group B (P<0.05). *P<0.05. Gal-3, galectin-3; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Correlation of Gal-3 concentration with cardiac function grading in group A (mean ± SD).
| Cardiac function grading | n | Gal-3 (ng/ml) |
|---|---|---|
| Grade I | 20 | 4.63±0.89 |
| Grade II | 26 | 6.74±1.43[ |
| Grade III | 30 | 7.89±1.76[ |
| Grade IV | 24 | 8.37±2.26[ |
| F-value | – | 21.370 |
| P-value | – | <0.001 |
P<0.05, compared with grade I
P<0.05 compared with grade II
P<0.05, compared with grade III. Gal-3, galectin-3.
Figure 2.Correlation of serum Gal-3 concentration with cardiac function grading in group A. Serum Gal-3 concentration was positively correlated with cardiac function grading (r=0.569, P<0.001). Gal-3, galectin-3.
Comparison of diastolic function indexes before and after treatment in group A, and between group A and group B (mean ± SD).
| Group A (n=100) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Indexes | Before treatment | After treatment | Group B (n=80) |
| EPFV (m/sec) | 0.67±0.13 | 0.76±0.17[ | 0.81±0.14[ |
| APFV (m/sec) | 0.81±0.15 | 0.72±0.14[ | 0.63±0.12[ |
| EPFV/APFV | 0.84±0.13 | 1.03±0.16[ | 1.22±0.16[ |
| E/E′ | 17.24±4.57 | 13.42±3.18[ | 7.86±2.54[ |
P<0.05, compared with the same index before treatment
P<0.05, compared with the same index after treatment. Gal-3, galectin-3; EPFV, early peak flow velocity; APFV, atrial peak flow velocity; EPFV/APFV, maximum flow velocity ratio of early to atrial diastole; E/E′, peak mitral annulus velocity.
ROC curve analysis of serum Gal-3 concentration predicting the therapeutic effect of hypertension combined with diastolic dysfunction.
| Diagnostic indicator | AUC | 95% CI | Sth. Error | Cut-off | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gal-3 (ng/ml) | 0.792 | 0.691–0.894 | 0.052 | 7.68 | 73.24 | 79.31 |
ROC, receiver operating characteristic; Gal-3, galectin-3; AUC, area under curve; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3.Serum Gal-3 concentration before treatment in the effective and invalid groups and its predictive value for efficacy. (A) According to ELISA, before treatment, serum Gal-3 concentration in the effective group was significantly lower than that in the invalid group (P<0.05). (B) According to the ROC curve, the AUC of serum Gal-3 concentration for evaluating efficacy was 0.792 (95% CI, 0.691–0.894), the sensitivity was 73.24% and the specificity was 79.31%, with an optimal cut-off value of 7.68 ng/ml. *P<0.05. Gal-3, galectin-3; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; AUC, area under curve; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.