Literature DB >> 31853284

Efficacy evaluation of serum galectin-3 in hypertension complicated with diastolic dysfunction.

Tianwei Dong1, Hongbin Li2, Shuang Wang1, Weida Chen1.   

Abstract

Serum galectin-3 (Gal-3) in patients with hypertension complicated with diastolic dysfunction and its predictive value for efficacy were investigated. One hundred patients with hypertension complicated with diastolic dysfunction admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University from June 2017 to December 2018 were enrolled as group A, symptomatically treated with conventional drugs. Further 80 individuals undergoing physical examination during the same period were enrolled as group B. Patients in the two groups were subjected to echocardiography to observe mitral valve early peak flow velocity (EPFV), atrial peak flow velocity (APFV), maximum flow velocity ratio of early to atrial diastole (EPFV/APFV) and peak mitral annulus velocity (E/E'). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect serum Gal-3 concentration. According to efficacy after treatment, patients in group A were divided into the effective group (71 patients) and the invalid group (29 patients). Gal-3 concentration in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (P<0.05). After treatment, the concentration in group A was significantly lower than that before treatment (P<0.05), but significantly higher than that in group B (P<0.05). Gal-3 concentration was significantly higher in patients with cardiac function grades II, III and IV than that in patients with grade I (P<0.05). According to Spearman's test, Gal-3 concentration was positively correlated with cardiac function grading (r=0.569, P<0.001). Compared with before treatment in group A, patients after treatment had significantly higher EPFV and EPFV/APFV (P<0.05), but significantly lower APFV and E/E' (P<0.05). Before treatment, Gal-3 concentration in the effective group was significantly lower than that in the invalid group (P<0.05). According to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under curve (AUC) of Gal-3 concentration for evaluating efficacy was 0.792, the sensitivity was 73.24%, and the specificity was 79.31%. In conclusion, Gal-3 may be involved in the development and progression of hypertension complicated with diastolic dysfunction. Its concentration increases with the rise of cardiac function grading but significantly decreases after treatment. Therefore, Gal-3 concentration before treatment can be used as a potential predictor of efficacy. Copyright: © Dong et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical efficacy; galectin-3; hypertension complicated with diastolic dysfunction; predictive value

Year:  2019        PMID: 31853284      PMCID: PMC6909668          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.8215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


Introduction

Hypertension as a clinically common disease is divided into primary and secondary hypertension, of which the former is more common (1). Hypertension endangers the health of adults and children, and causes multi-organ diseases, especially diseases in the cardiovascular system. The disease worsens with time if the patients are not treated properly (2). Hypertension usually leads to heart failure, left ventricular hypertrophy and other complications, which cause significant heart injury, affecting left ventricular diastolic function and result in cardiac dysfunction (3). The progression of hypertensive heart disease includes myocardial fibrosis and changes in left ventricular geometry, without signs and symptoms of heart failure or left ventricular systolic dysfunction before functional changes (4,5). Half of the patients with hypertension have diastolic dysfunction, which has proved closely related to the increasing incidence and morbidity of cardiovascular diseases and the progression of heart failure (6). Patients with diastolic dysfunction have increased year by year with the high incidence of hypertension and its complications (7). Hypertension is usually treated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARB), calcium antagonist (CCB) and β receptor blockers. These drugs can relieve hypertensive patients' left ventricular diastolic function, clinical signs and symptoms (5,8,9). Galectin-3 (Gal-3), which is a member of the galectin family and a β-galactoside-binding protein of 30-kDa, plays an important role in immune regulation (10). As a pathogenic factor of heart failure, Gal-3 not only causes myocardial inflammation and fibrosis and affects left ventricular systolic function, but also promotes cardiac remodeling, myocardial fibrosis and heart failure (11). According to a previous study, Gal-3 is closely related to the development and progression of cardiovascular diseases, expected to be a biomarker for assisting the diagnosis and prognosis of cardiac diseases (12). However, the role of Gal-3 in the development, progression and treatment of hypertension complicated with diastolic dysfunction remains unclear. Therefore, GAL-3 expression in patients with the disease was detected in this study to explore the role of Gal-3 in the development, progression and treatment of the disease.

Patients and methods

General information

One hundred patients with hypertension complicated with diastolic dysfunction admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University (Jiamusi, China) from June 2017 to December 2018 were enrolled as group A. The patients consisted of 53 males and 47 females, aged 46–75 years with an average age of 63.57±10.38 years. According to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification (13), there were 20 patients with grade I, 26 patients with grade II, 30 patients with grade III and 24 patients with grade IV in group A. Inclusion criteria for group A: Patients who met the diagnostic criteria for hypertension in the World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension (WHO/ISH) (14); patients with an E/A value of cardiac color ultrasound <1; patients with a diastolic pressure ≥90 mmHg or a systolic pressure ≥140 mmHg. Exclusion criteria: Those with secondary hypertension, coronary heart disease, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, cerebrovascular diseases, cardiomyopathy, diabetes, acute pulmonary embolism, connective tissue diseases, nervous system diseases, immune diseases, endocrine and metabolic diseases, malignant tumors or severe hepatorenal damage; those with mental illness and a family history of psychosis; those who had taken diuretic drugs to reduce blood pressure within the past 3 months; those who were not treated according to the doctor's advice. Further 80 individuals undergoing physical examination during the same period served as group B. The subjects in group B consisted of 46 males and 34 females, aged 41–69 years with an average age of 60.69±10.67 years. The inclusion criteria were applied to group A, and the subjects in group B were healthy controls. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University. The subjects and their families were informed and signed a fully informed consent form.

Therapeutic methods and efficacy evaluation

Patients in group A were routinely treated, which included smoking cessation, temperance, reduction of sodium intake, weight and fat intake, and increasing of aerobic exercise. Their myocardial function and blood pressure were monitored in real-time. According to conditions, the patients were treated with ACEI, ARB, CCB and β receptor blockers for 3 months, with diuresis, potassium excretion and correction of acid-base equilibrium disorders given at the same time. Adverse reactions during the treatment were observed. Grading: Markedly effective: Symptoms and signs disappeared completely, and improvement of cardiac function was grade II. Effective: Symptoms and signs were improved, and improvement of cardiac function was grade I. Invalid: Symptoms, signs and cardiac function had no significant change and even worsened.

Echocardiography

GE Vivid 7 color ultrasonic device (General Electric Company) and M3S probe with 2.5 MHz were used for analysis and measurement by specialist physicians in ultrasonic medicine. Subjects were in supine position breathing calmly, and their ECG was synchronously recorded to obtain the standard two-dimensional images of sections of the heart, and the frequency spectrums of valve orifices and pulmonary vein. Left ventricular diastolic function was determined with respect to mitral valve early peak flow velocity (EPFV), atrial peak flow velocity (APFV), maximum flow velocity ratio of early to atrial diastole (EPFV/APFV) and peak mitral annulus velocity (E/E′).

Detection methods

Five milliliters of fasting peripheral blood was extracted, placed in a vacuum tube free of anticoagulant, and centrifuged at 670.8 × g, at 20–25°C for 10 min to separate serum. An Elx-800 microplate reader (BioTek) was used to detect serum Gal-3 concentration, with steps carried out in accordance with the instructions of human Gal-3 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Renjie Biotechnology Co., Ltd.). The kit and the sample to be tested were taken out 20 min in advance to balance with room temperature. Sample wells, standard wells and blank wells were set up. The standard wells were added with 50 µl of standard substances with different concentrations, the sample wells were added with 50 µl of the sample to be tested, nothing was added to the blank wells. The wells were added with 100 µl of horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled detection secondary goat anti-human IgG monoclonal antibody (1:250; cat. no. A0201; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) (https://www.beyotime.com/product/A0201.htm), covered with tectorial membranes, and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. After that, they were added with 350 µl of cleaning solution and allowed to stand for 1 min. The liquid in wells was discarded and the wells were dried with absorbent paper. The wells were washed 5 times. Next, the wells were added with 50 µl each of substrates A and B, and incubated at 37°C for 15 min in the dark. Finally, they were added with 50 µl of stop solution. The Elx-800 microplate reader was used to detect OD values of wells at 450 nm within 15 min, in order to calculate Gal-3 concentration.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 20.0 (IBM Corporation) was used to statistically analyze the data, GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, Inc.) to plot figures. Enumeration data were expressed as [n (%)], and Chi-square test was used for comparison of enumeration data between groups. Measurement data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD), and independent samples t-test was used for comparison of measurement data between groups, paired t-test for comparison before and after treatment within groups. Spearman's test was used for correlation analysis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to plot the diagnostic value of Gal-3 concentration before treatment for efficacy. P<0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference.

Results

Comparison of general information

There was no significant difference between group A and group B in terms of sex, age, history of smoking, history of drinking, place of residence, educational level, fasting blood glucose (FBG), hemoglobin (Hb), red blood cell (RBC) count, platelet (PLT) count, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), uric acid or serum creatinine (P>0.05) (Table I).
Table I.

Comparison of general information [n (%)] (mean ± SD).

CategoryGroup A (n=100)Group B (n=80)t/χ2P-value
Sex0.3640.547
  Male53 (53.00)46 (57.50)
  Female47 (47.00)34 (42.50)
Age (years)63.57±10.3860.69±10.671.8270.069
History of smoking0.1900.663
  Yes57 (57.00)43 (53.75)
  No43 (43.00)37 (46.25)
History of drinking0.2510.616
  Yes55 (55.00)41 (51.25)
  No45 (45.00)39 (48.75)
Place of residence0.6410.423
  City67 (67.00)49 (61.25)
  Countryside33 (33.00)31 (38.75)
Educational level0.8180.366
  ≥University42 (42.00)39 (48.75)
  <University58 (58.00)41 (51.25)
FBG (mmol/l)5.53±1.375.74±2.260.7690.443
Hb (g/l)116.58±10.85119.57±13.531.6460.102
RBC (×1012/l)4.63±0.354.71±0.451.3420.181
PLT (×109/l)147.48±15.28151.52±16.371.7080.090
AST (U/l)21.73±9.6520.45±8.650.9260.356
ALT (U/l)19.42±8.2617.35±9.411.5700.118
Uric acid (µmol/l)298.16±65.37281.52±45.381.9340.055
Serum creatinine (µmol/l)79.13±14.1675.61±12.591.7400.084
Cardiac function grading
  Grade I20 (20.00)
  Grade II26 (26.00)
  Grade III30 (30.00)
  Grade IV24 (24.00)

FBG, fasting blood glucose; Hb, hemoglobin; RBC, red blood cell count; PLT, platelet count; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase.

Comparison of Gal-3 concentration

In group A, Gal-3 concentration was 7.16±1.63 ng/ml before treatment and 4.37±1.52 ng/ml after treatment. The concentration was 3.26±1.43 ng/ml in group B. Gal-3 concentration in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (P<0.05). After treatment, the concentration in group A was significantly lower than that before treatment (P<0.05), but significantly higher than that in group B (P<0.05) (Fig. 1).
Figure 1.

Comparison of serum Gal-3 concentration before and after treatment between group A and group B. According to ELISA, serum Gal-3 concentration in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (P<0.05). After treatment, the concentration in group A was significantly lower than that before treatment (P<0.05), but significantly higher than that in group B (P<0.05). *P<0.05. Gal-3, galectin-3; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Correlation of Gal-3 concentration with cardiac function grading in group A

Gal-3 concentration was significantly higher in patients with cardiac function grades II, III and IV than that in patients with grade I (P<0.05). The concentration increased with the rise of cardiac function grading. Cardiac function grade I was set as 1, grade II as 2, grade III as 3 and grade IV as 4. According to Spearman's correlation, Gal-3 concentration was positively correlated with cardiac function grading (r=0.569, P<0.001) (Table II and Fig. 2).
Table II.

Correlation of Gal-3 concentration with cardiac function grading in group A (mean ± SD).

Cardiac function gradingnGal-3 (ng/ml)
Grade I204.63±0.89
Grade II266.74±1.43[a]
Grade III307.89±1.76[a,b]
Grade IV248.37±2.26[ac]
F-value21.370
P-value<0.001

P<0.05, compared with grade I

P<0.05 compared with grade II

P<0.05, compared with grade III. Gal-3, galectin-3.

Figure 2.

Correlation of serum Gal-3 concentration with cardiac function grading in group A. Serum Gal-3 concentration was positively correlated with cardiac function grading (r=0.569, P<0.001). Gal-3, galectin-3.

Comparison of diastolic function indexes

Compared with before treatment in group A, patients after treatment had significantly higher EPFV and EPFV/APFV (P<0.05), but significantly lower APFV and E/E′ (P<0.05). Compared with group B, patients in group A after treatment had significantly lower EPFV and EPFV/APFV (P<0.05), but significantly higher APFV and E/E′ (P<0.05) (Table III).
Table III.

Comparison of diastolic function indexes before and after treatment in group A, and between group A and group B (mean ± SD).

Group A (n=100)

IndexesBefore treatmentAfter treatmentGroup B (n=80)
EPFV (m/sec)0.67±0.130.76±0.17[a]0.81±0.14[a,b]
APFV (m/sec)0.81±0.150.72±0.14[a]0.63±0.12[a,b]
EPFV/APFV0.84±0.131.03±0.16[a]1.22±0.16[a,b]
E/E′17.24±4.5713.42±3.18[a]7.86±2.54[a,b]

P<0.05, compared with the same index before treatment

P<0.05, compared with the same index after treatment. Gal-3, galectin-3; EPFV, early peak flow velocity; APFV, atrial peak flow velocity; EPFV/APFV, maximum flow velocity ratio of early to atrial diastole; E/E′, peak mitral annulus velocity.

Gal-3 concentration before treatment in the effective and invalid groups and its predictive value for efficacy

During treatment, group A had 2 patients with nausea and 1 patient with dizziness, none of whom were treated. After treatment, group A had 39 markedly effective patients, 32 effective patients and 29 invalid patients. According to efficacy after treatment, the patients in group A were divided into the effective group (71 patients) and the invalid group (29 patients). Before treatment, Gal-3 concentration in the effective group was 6.41±1.73 ng/ml, significantly lower than 9.16±2.37 ng/ml in the invalid group (P<0.05). The ROC curve of Gal-3 concentration before treatment was plotted for diagnosing the efficacy for hypertension complicated with diastolic dysfunction. The AUC of Gal-3 concentration was 0.792 (95% CI, 0.691–0.894), the sensitivity was 73.24% and the specificity was 79.31%, with an optimal cut-off value of 7.68 ng/ml (Table IV and Fig. 3).
Table IV.

ROC curve analysis of serum Gal-3 concentration predicting the therapeutic effect of hypertension combined with diastolic dysfunction.

Diagnostic indicatorAUC95% CISth. ErrorCut-offSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)
Gal-3 (ng/ml)0.7920.691–0.8940.0527.6873.2479.31

ROC, receiver operating characteristic; Gal-3, galectin-3; AUC, area under curve; CI, confidence interval.

Figure 3.

Serum Gal-3 concentration before treatment in the effective and invalid groups and its predictive value for efficacy. (A) According to ELISA, before treatment, serum Gal-3 concentration in the effective group was significantly lower than that in the invalid group (P<0.05). (B) According to the ROC curve, the AUC of serum Gal-3 concentration for evaluating efficacy was 0.792 (95% CI, 0.691–0.894), the sensitivity was 73.24% and the specificity was 79.31%, with an optimal cut-off value of 7.68 ng/ml. *P<0.05. Gal-3, galectin-3; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; AUC, area under curve; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.

Discussion

With an increasing incidence in recent years, hypertension is an important risk factor for many cardiovascular diseases (15). Major cardiac changes in patients with hypertension are left ventricular enlargement and hypertrophy, which are leading causes of cardiac diastolic dysfunction (16). In the early stage of cardiac diastolic dysfunction, the symptoms and signs of heart failure are unapparent. However, as the disease progresses, most patients with cardiac diastolic dysfunction suffer from secondary systolic dysfunction, aggravated signs and symptoms of heart failure (17). Therefore, it is particularly important to find biomarkers related to the development, progression and treatment of hypertension complicated with diastolic dysfunction. As a β-galactoside-binding lectin and a member of the soluble protein family, Gal-3 present in the nucleus promotes vascular injury and cardiovascular fibrosis. In patients with heart failure, plasma Gal-3 level has been proven to be the best predictor of short-term prognosis (18). There are many studies on Gal-3 in hypertension and heart failure. According to Calvier et al (19), Gal-3 concentration in plasma of patients with pulmonary hypertension significantly increases, so Gal-3 plays an important role in the pathophysiological process of the disease, and it can be used as a biomarker for reflecting the functional state and disease progression of the disease. According to Singh et al (20), Gal-3 is involved in the pathogenesis of cardiac fibrosis which is a leading cause of diastolic dysfunction, so it can be used as a predictor of diastolic dysfunction in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure. The results of this study showed that Gal-3 concentration in group A was significantly higher than that in group B, and positively correlated with cardiac function grading; that is, Gal-3 concentration significantly increased with the rise of cardiac function grading. These findings indicate that Gal-3 may be involved in the development and progression of hypertension complicated with diastolic dysfunction, and it increases with the aggravation of the disease. This is similar to the findings of previous studies. The pathological process of hypertensive disease progression is myocardial fibrosis (21). Therefore, Gal-3 as a marker for myocardial fibrosis (22) may gradually increase with the deterioration of cardiac function and the aggravation of myocardial fibrosis. Clinically, patients with hypertension are commonly treated with ACEI, ARB, CCB and β-receptor blockers, which can control blood pressure, improve cardiac structure and function, and inhibit myocardial fibrosis and the release of inflammatory cytokines. They can also reduce the left ventricle and its cardiac chamber, and improve cardiac diastolic function (23–26). In the present study, after treatment, Gal-3 concentration in group A was significantly lower than that before treatment, but significantly higher than that in group B. Although the patients' Gal-3 concentration after treatment did not return to normal, their cardiac diastolic function was improved. Therefore, the inhibition of Gal-3 concentration may be one of the therapeutic mechanisms. In a study by Calvier et al (27), the increasing expression of Gal-3 in experimental hyperaldosteronism is related to cardiac and renal fibrosis and dysfunction. Inhibition or blocking of the expression through drugs reduces cardiac and renal fibrosis, so Gal-3 can be used as a new target for pharmacological intervention. According to a study by Vergaro et al (28), the inhibition of Gal-3 expression and protein content prevents isoproterenol-induced left ventricular dysfunction and fibrosis in mice. Therefore, Gal-3 concentration may affect the treatment of the disease. In this study, before treatment, Gal-3 concentration in the effective group was significantly lower than that in the invalid group. According to the ROC curve, Gal-3 concentration before treatment had a high diagnostic value for the clinical efficacy. These findings indicate that Gal-3 concentration before treatment has a predictive value for efficacy. This study confirmed the role of Gal-3 concentration in the development, progression and treatment of patients with hypertension complicated with diastolic dysfunction, but it still has deficiencies in design. Drugs were given based on the patients' signs and symptoms, so their specific effects on Gal-3 concentration remain unclear and risk factors affecting the onset and treatment of the disease were not explored. These deficiencies require further research to support the results of this study. In conclusion, Gal-3 may be involved in the development and progression of hypertension complicated with diastolic dysfunction. Its concentration increases with the rise of cardiac function grading but significantly decreases after treatment. Therefore, Gal-3 concentration before treatment can be used as a potential predictor of efficacy.
  28 in total

1.  Diastolic dysfunction in hypertension.

Authors:  R Nazário Leão; P Marques da Silva
Journal:  Hipertens Riesgo Vasc       Date:  2017-03-06

Review 2.  Strategies for combination therapy in hypertension.

Authors:  Alan H Gradman
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Cardiac-deleterious role of galectin-3 in chronic angiotensin II-induced hypertension.

Authors:  Germán E González; N-E Rhaleb; Martin A D'Ambrosio; Pablo Nakagawa; Tang-Dong Liao; Edward L Peterson; Pablo Leung; Xiangguo Dai; Branislava Janic; Yun-He Liu; Xiao-Ping Yang; Oscar A Carretero
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 4.  Treatment of diastolic dysfunction in hypertension.

Authors:  P Ginelli; J N Bella
Journal:  Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.222

5.  Status of Hypertension in China: Results From the China Hypertension Survey, 2012-2015.

Authors:  Zengwu Wang; Zuo Chen; Linfeng Zhang; Xin Wang; Guang Hao; Zugui Zhang; Lan Shao; Ye Tian; Ying Dong; Congyi Zheng; Jiali Wang; Manlu Zhu; William S Weintraub; Runlin Gao
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Phenotyping of myocardial fibrosis in hypertensive patients with heart failure. Influence on clinical outcome.

Authors:  Susana Ravassa; Begoña López; Ramón Querejeta; Kattalin Echegaray; Gorka San José; María U Moreno; Francisco J Beaumont; Arantxa González; Javier Díez
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  Hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy have global left atrial dysfunction and impaired atrio-ventricular coupling.

Authors:  Camille Soullier; Joseph T Niamkey; Jean-Etienne Ricci; Patrick Messner-Pellenc; Xavier Brunet; Iris Schuster
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.844

8.  Drug treatment of hypertension in Sweden in relation to sex, age, and comorbidity.

Authors:  Fredrik Wallentin; Björn Wettermark; Thomas Kahan
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 9.  Functional Recovery in Major Depressive Disorder: Providing Early Optimal Treatment for the Individual Patient.

Authors:  Oloruntoba J Oluboka; Martin A Katzman; Jeffrey Habert; Diane McIntosh; Glenda M MacQueen; Roumen V Milev; Roger S McIntyre; Pierre Blier
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.176

10.  Potential novel biomarkers of cardiovascular dysfunction and disease: cardiotrophin-1, adipokines and galectin-3.

Authors:  Simona Hogas; Stefana C Bilha; Dumitru Branisteanu; Mihai Hogas; Abduzhappar Gaipov; Mehmet Kanbay; Adrian Covic
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.318

View more
  2 in total

1.  Trend of Galectin-3 Levels in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation and ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Branka Mitić; Andriana Jovanović; Valentina N Nikolić; Dragana Stokanović; Olivera M Andrejić; Rada M Vučić; Milan Pavlović; Aleksandra Ignjatović; Stefan Momčilović
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.430

2.  Galectin-3 for prediction of cardiac function compared to NT-proBNP in individuals with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Volker H Schmitt; Jürgen H Prochaska; Annegret S Föll; Andreas Schulz; Karsten Keller; Omar Hahad; Thomas Koeck; Sven-Oliver Tröbs; Steffen Rapp; Manfred Beutel; Norbert Pfeiffer; Konstantin Strauch; Karl J Lackner; Thomas Münzel; Philipp S Wild
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.