Literature DB >> 31852810

An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Two-Stage, Multicenter, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of TLC388 and Genomic Analysis for Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinomas.

Ming-Huang Chen1,2, Wen-Chi Chou3, Chin-Fu Hsiao4, Shih Sheng Jiang5, Hui-Jen Tsai6,7,8, Yi-Chang Liu7, Chiun Hsu9, Yan-Shen Shan10, Yi-Ping Hung1,2, Chia-Hsun Hsich3, Chao-Hua Chiu1,2, Ta-Chih Liu11, Shih-Feng Cho7, Tsang-Wu Liu5, Yee Chao1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The discovery of effective therapeutic options for treating metastatic poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) after prior platinum-based chemotherapy remains elusive. This study analyzed the efficacy of TLC388 (Lipotecan) Hydrochloride, a novel camptothecin analog, for pretreated patients with metastatic NEC.
METHODS: This single-arm, two-stage, phase II clinical trial was conducted at four community and academic centers in Taiwan. Patients aged 20 years or older with confirmed metastatic NEC and who had received prior systemic therapy with etoposide plus cisplatin were enrolled between July 2015 and May 2018. Patients received 40 mg/m2 of TLC388 intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. Gene mutations were analyzed by next-generation sequencing.
RESULTS: Twenty-three patients with a median age of 61 (range, 44-73) years, 18 of whom were men (78%), were enrolled. Patients received a median of 2 (range, 0-6) treatment cycles. Among 20 evaluable patients, 3 patients exhibited stable disease and no patient experienced a complete or partial remission, resulting in a disease control rate of 15%. Median progression-free survival was 1.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-15) months, and the median overall survival was 4.3 (95% CI, 1.7-15) months. The most common treatment-related hematologic adverse events at grade 3 or higher were leukopenia (22.7%), anemia (31.8%), and thrombocytopenia (18.2%). The most frequent mutated genes in 35 patients with NEC were ARSA, DPYD, HEXB, BRCA1, HPD, MYBPC3, BBS2, IL7R, HSD17B4, and PRODH.
CONCLUSION: TLC388 demonstrates limited antitumor activity in metastatic NEC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02457273. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are rare and aggressive. Currently, effective therapeutic options for treating metastatic poorly differentiated NECs beyond platinum-based chemotherapy remain elusive. In this single-arm, multicenter, phase II study, 23 patients with NEC were enrolled and received TLC388 (Lipotecan) Hydrochloride, which is a novel camptothecin analog. The results demonstrated the disease control rate of 15%, the median progression-free survival of 1.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-15) months, and the median overall survival of 4.3 (95% CI, 1.7-15) months. Most importantly, several novel genetic mutations and pathways were identified. These results offer the opportunity to develop future treatment strategies in this rare cancer. © AlphaMed Press 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetic profiles; Neuroendocrine carcinoma; TLC-388; Topotecan

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31852810      PMCID: PMC7216444          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  44 in total

1.  Poorly differentiated carcinomas of the foregut (gastric, duodenal and pancreatic).

Authors:  Ola Nilsson; Erik Van Cutsem; Gianfranco Delle Fave; James C Yao; Marianne E Pavel; Anne M McNicol; M I Sevilla Garcia; Wolfram H Knapp; Fahrettin Keleştimur; Alain Sauvanet; Stanislas Pauwels; Dik J Kwekkeboom; Martyn Caplin
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 4.914

Review 2.  The Future of Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Leora Horn; Martin Reck; David R Spigel
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-06-27

3.  Molecular characteristics of colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma; similarities with adenocarcinoma rather than neuroendocrine tumor.

Authors:  Nobuyoshi Takizawa; Yoshihiro Ohishi; Minako Hirahashi; Shunsuke Takahashi; Kazuhiko Nakamura; Masao Tanaka; Eiji Oki; Ryoichi Takayanagi; Yoshinao Oda
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 4.  DNA repair defects and implications for immunotherapy.

Authors:  Katherine M Bever; Dung T Le
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  BRAFV600E mutation: A promising target in colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Authors:  Levent Dizdar; Thomas A Werner; Jasmin C Drusenheimer; Birte Möhlendick; Katharina Raba; Inga Boeck; Martin Anlauf; Matthias Schott; Wolfgang Göring; Irene Esposito; Nikolas H Stoecklein; Wolfram T Knoefel; Andreas Krieg
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 6.  Small cell undifferentiated carcinoma of the larynx. Report of two patients and review of 13 additional cases.

Authors:  S E Mills; P H Cooper; T A Garland; M E Johns
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  A novel TUBB3 mutation in a sporadic patient with asymmetric cortical dysplasia.

Authors:  Keiko Shimojima; Nobuhiko Okamoto; Toshiyuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Extrapulmonary small-cell carcinoma compared with small-cell lung carcinoma: a retrospective single-center study.

Authors:  Irfan Cicin; Hakan Karagol; Sernaz Uzunoglu; Kazim Uygun; Ufuk Usta; Zafer Kocak; Murat Caloglu; Mert Saynak; Fusun Tokatli; Cem Uzal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system.

Authors:  G Rindi; G Klöppel; H Alhman; M Caplin; A Couvelard; W W de Herder; B Erikssson; A Falchetti; M Falconi; P Komminoth; M Körner; J M Lopes; A-M McNicol; O Nilsson; A Perren; A Scarpa; J-Y Scoazec; B Wiedenmann
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 4.064

View more
  3 in total

1.  Inefficiency of two-stage designs in phase II oncology clinical trials with high proportion of inevaluable patients.

Authors:  Lingyun Ji; Jennifer Whangbo; John E Levine; Todd A Alonzo
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 2.261

2.  Comparative Outcomes of Second-line Topoisomerase-I Inhibitor Therapies on Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ho-Man Yeung; Krishnalatha Sreekrishnanilayam; Caitlin Meeker; Mengying Deng; Sonali Agrawal; Haaris Abdullah; Namrata Vijayvergia
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2022-01-10

Review 3.  Systemic Treatment of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma.

Authors:  Kazhan Mollazadegan; Staffan Welin; Joakim Crona
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-06-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.