| Literature DB >> 31852758 |
Yasuhiko Saito1, Taketoshi Sugimura2.
Abstract
Gaze holding in the horizontal and vertical directions is separately controlled via the oculomotor neural integrators, the prepositus hypoglossi nucleus (PHN) and the interstitial nucleus of Cajal (INC), respectively. Our previous in vitro studies demonstrated that transient, high-frequency local stimulation of the PHN and the INC increased the frequency of spontaneous EPSCs that lasted for several seconds. The sustained EPSC response of PHN neurons was attributed to the activation of local excitatory networks primarily mediated via Ca2+-permeable AMPA (CP-AMPA) receptors and Ca2+-activated nonselective cation (CAN) channels. However, the contribution of CP-AMPA receptors to the activation of INC excitatory networks appeared to be small. In this study, we clarified the mechanisms of excitatory network activation in the PHN and INC using whole-cell recordings in rat brainstem slices. Although physiological and histological analyses showed that neurons that expressed CP-AMPA receptors existed not only in the PHN but also in the INC, the effect of a CP-AMPA receptor antagonist on the sustained EPSC response was significantly weaker in INC neurons than in PHN neurons. Meanwhile, the effect of an NMDA receptor antagonist on the sustained EPSC response was significantly stronger in INC neurons than in PHN neurons. Furthermore, the current and the charge transfer mediated via NMDA receptors were significantly larger in INC neurons than in PHN neurons. These results strongly suggest that these excitatory networks are activated via different synaptic mechanisms: a CP-AMPA receptor and CAN channel-dependent mechanism and an NMDA receptor-dependent mechanism in horizontal and vertical integrators, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: excitatory network; gaze holding; integrator; rat; slice patch clamp; synaptic mechanism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31852758 PMCID: PMC6975485 DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0364-19.2019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: eNeuro ISSN: 2373-2822
Statistical test
| Label | Parameter (unit) | Bivariate | Cell# | Mean | SD | Distribution, | Power |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Duration of PHN neurons | Control | 8 | 2.6 | 0.8 | Normal, | 1.000 |
| B | Duration of INC neurons | Control | 8 | 2.1 | 0.6 | Non-normal, | 1.000 |
| C | EPSC rate of PHN neurons | Control | 8 | 30.3 | 6.7 | Normal, | 1.000 |
| D | EPSC rate of INC neurons | Control | 8 | 32.1 | 13.6 | Normal, | 0.999 |
| E | Reduction in duration | PHN | 8 | 62.2 | 15.4 | Non-normal, | 1.000 |
| F | Reduction in EPSC rate | PHN | 8 | 48.3 | 21.4 | Normal, | 0.906 |
| G | Distribution of RI | PHN | 48 | 0.88 | 0.21 | Normal, | 0.833 |
| H | Duration of PHN neurons | Control | 10 | 2.1 | 0.8 | Non-normal, | 0.524 |
| I | Duration of INC neurons | Control | 10 | 1.7 | 0.4 | Normal, | 1.000 |
| J | EPSC rate of PHN neurons | Control | 10 | 22.1 | 8.5 | Normal, | 0.637 |
| K | EPSC rate of INC neurons | Control | 10 | 21.7 | 6.1 | Normal, | 1.000 |
| L | Reduction in duration | PHN | 10 | 10.8 | 11.2 | Normal, | 1.000 |
| M | Reduction in EPSC rate | PHN | 10 | 14.7 | 13.1 | Normal, | 0.899 |
| N | NMDA/AMPA ratio | PHN | 44 | 0.56 | 0.45 | Non-normal, | 0.841 |
| O | NMDA charge transfer | PHN | 44 | 11.8 | 5.6 | Non-normal, | 0.999 |
| P | Duration of PHN neurons | Control | 8 | 2.4 | 0.6 | Normal, | 0.990 |
| Q | Duration of INC neurons | Control | 8 | 2.7 | 0.7 | Non-normal, | 0.963 |
| R | EPSC rate of PHN neurons | Control | 8 | 29.0 | 10.0 | Normal, | 0.948 |
| S | EPSC rate of INC neurons | Control | 8 | 26.3 | 6.7 | Normal, | 0.900 |
| T | Reduction in duration | PHN | 8 | 47.7 | 22.3 | Normal, | 0.844 |
| U | Reduction in EPSC rate | PHN | 8 | 46.1 | 21.5 | Normal, | 0.902 |
Figure 1.Difference in the expression of CP-AMPA receptors in PHN and INC neurons. , , EPSC responses of a PHN neuron () and an INC neuron () to burst stimulation before (, ) and during (, ) the application of 50 μm NAS. The arrow indicates the artifact induced by the burst stimulation. Bottom, Histograms showing the averaged EPSC frequency against time. The width of the histogram bins is 100 ms. , , Comparisons of the percentage reduction in EPSC duration () and frequency () caused by NAS between PHN and INC neurons. Asterisks indicate a significant difference between groups (**p < 0.01). , Current responses of two different INC neurons (, ) to puff application of 20 mm kainate at holding potentials of −60 and +40 mV. Histograms of PHN neurons (; n = 48) and INC neurons (; n = 45) exhibiting different RI values. Gray bars indicate an RI > 1. , Kainate-induced Co2+ uptake in the PHN (top) and the INC (bottom). Darkly stained cells indicate the cells that took Co2+ into their body via Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptors. Right panels show the negative control that was obtained in the presence of NBQX. The dashed lines indicate the approximate regions of the PHN and the INC.
Figure 2.Comparison of the effects of APV on EPSC responses between PHN and INC neurons. , , EPSC responses of a PHN neuron to burst stimulation before () and during () the application of 50 μm APV. , , EPSC responses of an INC neuron to burst stimulation before () and during () APV application. Bottom, Histograms showing the averaged EPSC frequency against time. The width of the histogram bins is 100 ms. , , Comparison of the duration of the increased EPSC frequency of PHN () and INC () neurons before and during APV application. , Comparison of the percentage reduction in the duration caused by APV between PHN and INC neurons. , , Comparison of the frequency of EPSCs after burst stimulation of PHN () and INC () neurons before and during APV application. , Comparison of the percentage reduction in the EPSC frequency caused by APV between PHN and INC neurons. Plots indicate data obtained from individual neurons, and the bar represents the average value. Asterisks indicate a significant difference between groups (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01).
Figure 3.Comparison of NMDA receptor-mediated currents between PHN and INC neurons. , Current traces of two different INC neurons to puff application of 1 mm kainite at a holding potential of −70 mV and of 1 mm NMDA at a holding potential of +40 mV. The NMDA/AMPA ratios of neurons (, ) were 0.39 and 1.26, respectively. , , Comparisons of the NMDA/AMPA ratio () and the charge transfer of the NMDA receptor-mediated currents () between PHN and INC neurons. Plots indicate data obtained from individual neurons. Boxes indicate percentile plots. The bottom and top of each box represent the 5% and 95% percentiles of the data, respectively. The middle line in the box represents the median value of the data, whereas the lower and upper dashed lines represent the 25th and 75th percentiles of the data, respectively. Asterisks indicate a significant difference between groups (p < 0.01).
Figure 4.Comparison of the effects of FFA on EPSC responses between PHN and INC neurons. , , EPSC responses of a PHN neuron to burst stimulation before () and during () the application of 200 μM flufenamic acid (FFA). , , EPSC responses of an INC neuron to burst stimulation before () and during () FFA application. , , Comparison of the duration of the increased EPSC frequency of PHN () and INC () neurons before and during FFA application. , Comparison of the percentage reduction in the duration caused by FFA between PHN and INC neurons. , , Comparison of the EPSC frequency after the burst stimulation of PHN () and INC () neurons before and during FFA application. , Comparison of the percentage reduction in the EPSC frequency caused by FFA between PHN and INC neurons. Plots indicate data obtained from individual neurons, and the bar represents the average value. Asterisks indicate a significant difference between groups (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01).
Figure 5.Schematic drawings of the structure of local excitatory circuits in the PHN and the INC. Burst inputs from the premotor areas, such as the pontine reticular formation and the vestibular nucleus, are transformed into tonic outputs to the extraocular motor nuclei by activation of the local excitatory network. Red dashed arrow indicates propagation of excitation.