Literature DB >> 31852048

Disease-Specific Plan Switching Between Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage.

Sungchul Park1, Paul Fishman2, Lindsay White2, Eric B Larson3, Norma B Coe4,5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Previous research has reported switching from traditional Medicare (TM) to Medicare Advantage (MA) plans increased from 2006 to 2011 at the aggregate level, and switching from MA plans to TM also increased. However, little is known about switching behavior among individuals with specific chronic diseases.
OBJECTIVE: To examine disease-specific switching patterns between TM and MA to understand the impact on MA plans.
METHODS: Using the 2006 to 2012 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, we examined disease-specific switching rates between TM and MA and disease-specific ratios of mean baseline total Medicare expenditures of beneficiaries remaining in the same plan (stayers) vs those switching to another plan (switchers), respectively. We focused on beneficiaries with 1 or more of 10 incident diagnoses.
RESULTS: Beneficiaries with a new diagnosis of Alzheimer disease and related dementias, hypertension, and psychiatric disorders had relatively high rates of switching into MA plans and low rates of switching out of MA plans. Among those with new diagnoses of psychiatric disorders and diabetes, more costly beneficiaries (those with higher costs) switched into MA plans. For cancer, more costly beneficiaries remained in MA plans.
CONCLUSION: Together, these results suggest that MA plans may have not only higher caseloads but also a more costly case mix of beneficiaries with certain diseases than historically was the case. Our findings can help inform MA plans to understand their beneficiaries' disease burden and prepare for provision of relevant services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31852048      PMCID: PMC6907897          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/19.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  11 in total

1.  Analysis of Drivers of Disenrollment and Plan Switching Among Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.

Authors:  David J Meyers; Emmanuelle Belanger; Nina Joyce; John McHugh; Momotazur Rahman; Vincent Mor
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  At least half of new Medicare advantage enrollees had switched from traditional Medicare during 2006-11.

Authors:  Gretchen A Jacobson; Patricia Neuman; Anthony Damico
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Favorable selection, risk adjustment, and the Medicare Advantage program.

Authors:  Michael A Morrisey; Meredith L Kilgore; David J Becker; Wilson Smith; Elizabeth Delzell
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  High-Cost Patients Had Substantial Rates Of Leaving Medicare Advantage And Joining Traditional Medicare.

Authors:  Momotazur Rahman; Laura Keohane; Amal N Trivedi; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Does Part D abet advantageous selection in Medicare Advantage?

Authors:  Tony Han; Kurt Lavetti
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  HOW MUCH FAVORABLE SELECTION IS LEFT IN MEDICARE ADVANTAGE?

Authors:  Joseph P Newhouse; Mary Price; J Michael McWilliams; John Hsu; Thomas G McGuire
Journal:  Am J Health Econ       Date:  2015

7.  New risk-adjustment system was associated with reduced favorable selection in medicare advantage.

Authors:  J Michael McWilliams; John Hsu; Joseph P Newhouse
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Steps to reduce favorable risk selection in medicare advantage largely succeeded, boding well for health insurance exchanges.

Authors:  Joseph P Newhouse; Mary Price; Jie Huang; J Michael McWilliams; John Hsu
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Matching MCBS (Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey) and Medicare data: the best of both worlds.

Authors:  F J Eppig; G S Chulis
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1997

10.  Prevalence of multiple chronic conditions among Medicare beneficiaries, United States, 2010.

Authors:  Kimberly A Lochner; Christine S Cox
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  5 in total

1.  Health Care Utilization, Care Satisfaction, and Health Status for Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries With and Without Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias.

Authors:  Sungchul Park; Lindsay White; Paul Fishman; Eric B Larson; Norma B Coe
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-03-02

2.  Health Care Costs of Alzheimer's and Related Dementias Within a Medicare Managed Care Provider.

Authors:  Paul A Fishman; Lindsay White; Bailey Ingraham; Sungchul Park; Eric B Larson; Paul Crane; Norma B Coe
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The relationship between insurance and health outcomes of diabetes mellitus patients in Maryland: a retrospective archival record study.

Authors:  Soo-Hoon Lee; Samuel L Brown; Andrew A Bennett
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Completeness of cohort-linked U.S. Medicare data: An example from the Agricultural Health Study (1999-2016).

Authors:  Christine G Parks; Srishti Shrestha; Stuart Long; Thomas Flottemesch; Sarah Woodruff; Honglei Chen; Gabriella Andreotti; Jonathan N Hofmann; Laura E Beane Freeman; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-03-15

5.  Differences in Health Care Utilization, Process of Diabetes Care, Care Satisfaction, and Health Status in Patients With Diabetes in Medicare Advantage Versus Traditional Medicare.

Authors:  Sungchul Park; Eric B Larson; Paul Fishman; Lindsay White; Norma B Coe
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.178

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.