Literature DB >> 31851957

Clinical implementation in proton therapy of multi-field optimization by a hybrid method combining conventional PTV with robust optimization.

Francesco Tommasino1, Lamberto Widesott, Francesco Fracchiolla, Stefano Lorentini, Roberto Righetto, Carlo Algranati, Emanuele Scifoni, Francesco Dionisi, Daniele Scartoni, Dante Amelio, Marco Cianchetti, Marco Schwarz, Maurizio Amichetti, Paolo Farace.   

Abstract

To implement a robust multi-field optimization (MFO) technique compatible with the application of a Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm and to evaluate its robustness. Nine patients (three brain, five head-and-neck, one spine) underwent proton treatment generated by a novel robust MFO technique. A hybrid (hMFO) approach was implemented, planning dose coverage on isotropic PTV compensating for setup errors, whereas range calibration uncertainties are incorporated into PTV robust optimization process. hMFO was compared with single-field optimization (SFO) and full robust multi-field optimization (fMFO), both on the nominal plan and the worst-case scenarios assessed by robustness analysis. The SFO and the fMFO plans were normalized to hMFO on CTV to obtain iso-D95 coverage, and then the organs at risk (OARs) doses were compared. On the same OARs, in the normalized nominal plans the potential impact of variable relative biological effectiveness (RBE) was investigated. hMFO reduces the number of scenarios computed for robust optimization (from twenty-one in fMFO to three), making it practicable with the application of a MC algorithm. After normalizing on D95 CTV coverage, nominal hMFO plans were superior compared to SFO in terms of OARs sparing (p   <  0.01), without significant differences compared to fMFO. The improvement in OAR sparing with hMFO with respect to SFO was preserved in worst-case scenarios (p   <  0.01), confirming that hMFO is as robust as SFO to physical uncertainties, with no significant differences when compared to the worst case scenarios obtained by fMFO. The dose increase on OARs due to variable RBE was comparable to the increase due to physical uncertainties (i.e. 4-5 Gy(RBE)), but without significant differences between these techniques. hMFO allows improving plan quality with respect to SFO, with no significant differences with fMFO and without affecting robustness to setup, range and RBE uncertainties, making clinically feasible the application of MC-based robust optimization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31851957     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab63b9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  4 in total

1.  The Role of Plan Robustness Evaluation in Comparing Protons and Photons Plans - An Application on IMPT and IMRT Plans in Skull Base Chordomas.

Authors:  Manthala Padannayil Noufal; Lamberto Widesott; Shamurailatpam Dayananda Sharma; Roberto Righetto; Marco Cianchetti; Marco Schwarz
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2021-02-02

2.  Quantifying Systematic RBE-Weighted Dose Uncertainty Arising from Multiple Variable RBE Models in Organ at Risk.

Authors:  Wei Yang Calvin Koh; Hong Qi Tan; Yan Yee Ng; Yen Hwa Lin; Khong Wei Ang; Wen Siang Lew; James Cheow Lei Lee; Sung Yong Park
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-11-11

3.  Quantification of biological range uncertainties in patients treated at the Krakow proton therapy centre.

Authors:  Magdalena Garbacz; Jan Gajewski; Marco Durante; Kamil Kisielewicz; Nils Krah; Renata Kopeć; Paweł Olko; Vincenzo Patera; Ilaria Rinaldi; Marzena Rydygier; Angelo Schiavi; Emanuele Scifoni; Tomasz Skóra; Agata Skrzypek; Francesco Tommasino; Antoni Rucinski
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Combined proton-photon therapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Florian Amstutz; Silvia Fabiano; Louise Marc; Damien Charles Weber; Antony John Lomax; Jan Unkelbach; Ye Zhang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.506

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.