Literature DB >> 31850537

Focused ethnography as an approach in medical education research.

Pernille Andreassen1, Mette K Christensen1, Jane E Møller1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Over recent decades, the use of qualitative methodologies has increased in medical education research. These include ethnographic approaches, which have been used to explore complex cultural norms and phenomena by way of long-term engagement in the field of research. Often, however, medical education consists of short-term episodes that are not bound to single sites, but take place in a myriad of locations and contexts such as classrooms, examination stations, clinical settings and online. This calls for methodologies that allow us to grasp what is at stake in an increasingly multifaceted and diverse field.
METHODS: In this article, we direct attention to focused ethnography, which has emerged as a useful, suitable and feasible applied qualitative research approach, and which uses adapted classic ethnographic methods, such as direct observation, to gain new insights and nuanced understandings of distinct phenomena, themes and interactions in specific settings in medical education (eg the learning potential of ward rounds, or how hierarchical positions affect learning situations). We introduce methodological key features of focused ethnography to give insights into how the approach can be used, and we offer examples of how the method has been used in medical education research to show how it has contributed in different ways to the field of medical education research. Furthermore, we address and discuss some of the main challenges and limitations of the approach.
CONCLUSIONS: Focused ethnography offers a methodological approach that sheds light over limited and well-defined social episodes and interactions. Precisely because the field of medical education consists to a large degree of such fragmented interactions, focused ethnography can be seen as a methodology tailored to these characteristics and should become an integrated part of the toolkit of medical education research.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education.

Year:  2020        PMID: 31850537     DOI: 10.1111/medu.14045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  5 in total

1.  Chances for learning intraprofessional collaboration between residents in hospitals.

Authors:  Natasja Looman; Cornelia Fluit; Marielle van Wijngaarden; Esther de Groot; Patrick Dielissen; Dieneke van Asselt; Jacqueline de Graaf; Nynke Scherpbier-de Haan
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Applying the PDSA cycle to a group activity promoting lifestyle change for the active ageing of older Thai adults - a focused ethnography.

Authors:  Manothai Wongsala; Sirpa Rosendahl; Pornpun Manasatchakun; Els-Marie Anbäcken
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.921

3.  Transformative learning in the setting of religious healers: A case study of consultative mental health workshops with religious healers, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Yonas Baheretibeb; Sophie Soklaridis; Dawit Wondimagegn; Maria Athina Tina Martimianakis; Samuel Law
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 5.435

4.  Health professionals learning qualitative research in their workplace: a focused ethnography.

Authors:  Luca Ghirotto; Ludovica De Panfilis; Silvia Di Leo
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Behavioral Patterns in Breaking Bad News Communication: An Ethnographic Study with Hematologists.

Authors:  Giovanna Artioli; Luca Ghirotto; Sara Alquati; Silvia Tanzi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.