| Literature DB >> 31850328 |
Xuewei Pan1, Changhao Sun1, Mi Tang1, Chao Liu1, Jianing Zhang1, Jiajia You1, Tolbert Osire1, Yang Sun1, Youxi Zhao2, Meijuan Xu1, Taowei Yang1, Zhiming Rao1.
Abstract
Serratia marcescens, a gram-negative bacterium, found in a wide range of ecological niches can produce several high-value products, including prodigiosin, althiomycin, and serratamolide. Among them, prodigiosin has attracted attention due to its immunosuppressive, antimicrobial, and anticancer properties. However, the regulatory mechanisms behind prodigiosin synthesis in Serratia marcescens remains limited. Here, a transposon mutant library was constructed to identify the genes related to prodigiosin synthesis, and BVG90_02415 gene encoding a peptidoglycan synthesizing enzyme D-Ala-D-Ala carboxypeptidase DacA was found to negatively regulates prodigiosin synthesis. Quantitative measurements revealed that disruption of dacA increased prodigiosin production 1.46-fold that of the wild-type strain JNB5-1 in fermentation medium. By comparing differences in cell growth, pigA gene expression level, cell morphology, membrane permeability, and intracellular prodigiosin concentration between wild-type strain JNB5-1 and dacA mutant SK4-72, results revealed that the mechanism for hyper-producing of prodigiosin by the dacA mutant was probably that dacA disruption enhanced prodigiosin leakage, which in turn alleviated feedback inhibition of prodigiosin and increased expression of pig gene cluster. Collectively, this work provides a novel insight into regulatory mechanisms of prodigiosin synthesis and uncovers new roles of DacA protein in regulating cell growth, cell morphology, and membrane permeability in Serratia marcescens. Finally, this study offers a new strategy for improving production of high-value compounds in Serratia marcescens.Entities:
Keywords: D-Ala-Ala carboxypeptidase DacA; Serratia marcescens; feedback inhibition; prodigiosin leakage; prodigiosin synthesis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31850328 PMCID: PMC6901396 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00367
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
Strains and plasmids used in this study.
| DH5α | BRL | |
| S17-1 (λpir) | F− | Laboratory collection |
| S17-1/pXW1804-dacB | This Study | |
| S17-1/pXW1805-dacC | This Study | |
| S17-1/pXW1806-dacD | This Study | |
| JNB5-1 | Laboratory collection | |
| SK4-72 | This Study | |
| SK4-72/pXW1803 | Mutant SK4-72 with pXW1803 plasmid | This Study |
| JNB5-1ΔdacB | This Study | |
| JNB5-1ΔdacC | This Study | |
| JNB5-1ΔdacD | This Study | |
| pRK2013Tn | Tn | Nunn and Lory, |
| pMD18T | Cloning vector, 2,692 bp, AmpR, lacZ | TaKaRa |
| pACYC177 | low copy vector plasmid, AmpRKmR | Laboratory collection |
| pXW1803 | This Study | |
| pUTKm | Tn5-based delivery plasmid with KmRAmpR | Herrero et al., |
| pXW1804-dacB | Recombinant plasmid used for | This Study |
| pXW1805-dacC | Recombinant plasmid used for | This Study |
| pXW1806-dacD | Recombinant plasmid used for | This Study |
Primers used in this study.
| OTn1 | GATCCTGGAAAACGGGAAAG | Identification of Tn |
| OTn2 | CCATCTCATCAGAGGGTAGT | |
| RT-pigA-F | ATGGCTTTATGGGCGTGTCC | qPCR primers, coding region of |
| RT-pigA-R | GAGAGGCAATCTTTCGGGCT | |
| RT-16S-F | CACACCGCCCGTCACACCA | qPCR primers, coding region of 16S rRNA gene |
| RT-16S-R | CGCAGGTTCCCCTACGGTTAC | |
| DacA-F | TTAACCGAACCAGTGGTGGAACATC | Amplification of |
| DacA-R | TTAAGCCCGGCGGGCATTCA | |
| DacB-U-F | Amplification of | |
| DacB-U-R | ||
| DacB-D-F | Amplification of | |
| DacB-D-R | ||
| DacC-U-F | Amplification of | |
| DacC-U-R | ||
| DacC-D-F | Amplification of | |
| DacC-D-R | ||
| DacD-U-F | Amplification of | |
| DacD-U-R | ||
| DacD-D-F | Amplification of | |
| DacD-D-R | ||
| Apr-D-F | CGCGGAACCCCTATTTGTTTATTTTTC | Amplification of |
| Apr-D-R | TCAGCCAATCGACTGGCGAGC | |
| DacB-F | CCTGCTTTTCCATCAGTTCCAGG | Primers used to confirm |
| DacB-R | ATCAGTCCAAGTGGCCCATCTTC | |
| DacC-F | GCCGATGCGGTAAGCATTGC | Primers used to confirm |
| DacC-R | ATCAGTCCAAGTGGCCCATCTTC | |
| DacD-F | GGCCTTTATTATCGGCCAAACGG | Primers used to confirm |
| DacD-R | ATCAGTCCAAGTGGCCCATCTTC |
The sequences underlined stand for the homologous sequence of the pUTKm plasmid.
The sequences wavelined stand for the homologous sequence of the apramycin resistance aacC3 gene.
Figure 1Construction of a random Tn5G transposon library to identify genes involved in prodigiosin synthesis. (A) Prodigiosin production assay of the mutants isolated from Tn5G transposon insertion mutation. JNB5-1 is parental strain used for screening prodigiosin-synthesis mutants (n = 1). SK4-72 and SK3-15 are prodigiosin high-producing mutants with dacA and lrhA genes disrupted, respectively (n = 2). SK6-56 is prodigiosin low-producing mutant with pigC gene disrupted (n = 1). High indicates prodigiosin high-producing mutants (n = 103). Low indicates prodigiosin low-producing mutants (n = 160). (B) The genetic loci identified in prodigiosin hyper-producing mutant SK4-72. Black triangle indicates the Tn5G transposon insertion site. ybeB-rlpA operon including gene ybeB, rlmH, BVG90_02430, mrdB, and rlpA. (C) Peptidoglycan chain synthesis in S. marcescens. The role of the D-Ala-D-Ala-carboxypeptidases DacA is delete the C-terminal D-Ala from the peptidoglycan precursor pentapeptide molecules. For (A), the experiments were performed in biological triplicates. Error bars indicate the standard deviations.
Figure 2Effect of DacA on prodigiosin production and cell growth. (A) Prodigiosin production was significantly increased in dacA mutant SK4-72. (B) Growth curves of JNB5-1, SK4-72, and SK4-72/pXW1803 strains in LB medium. JNB5-1 is wild-type strain, SK4-72 is dacA mutant, and SK4-72/pXW1803 is dacA-complemented strain. Plasmid pXW1803 carries gene dacA with its own promoter. The experiments were performed in biological triplicates. Error bars indicate the standard deviations.
Figure 3Influence of DacA on prodigiosin-synthesis gene pigA expression and cell shape. (A) Gene organization of the prodigiosin biosynthetic gene clusters in S. marcescens. These 14 genes were transcribed as a polycistronic mRNA from a promoter upstream of pigA gene. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of the pigA gene expression level in the strains JNB5-1 and dacA mutant SK4-72. (C) SEM images of the cells of JNB5-1, SK4-72, and SK4-72/pXW1803 strains. (D) Measurements of cell length and width of the indicated cells (40 cells for each strains). For (B), the experiment was performed in biological triplicates. Error bars indicate the standard deviations. For (D), one-way ANOVA was used to examine the mean differences between the data groups. ****p < 0.0001; ns, No significant difference.
Figure 4DacA negatively regulates permeability of the outer and inner membranes. (A) Effects of dacA disruption on outer membrane permeability. (B) Effects of dacA disruption on inner membrane permeability. JNB5-1 is wild-type strain, SK4-72 is dacA mutant, and SK4-72/pXW1803 is dacA-complemented strain. The experiments were performed in biological triplicates. Error bars indicate the standard deviations. One-way ANOVA was used to examine the mean differences between the data groups. ****p < 0.001.
Figure 5DacA negatively regulates prodigiosin production in fermentation medium. (A) Prodigiosin production by JNB5-1, SK4-72, and SK4-72/pXW1803 strains. Blue lines show the total prodigiosin produced by corresponding strains. Red lines show the intracellular prodigiosin concentration of corresponding strains. (B) Proportion of extracellular prodigiosin of strains JNB5-1, SK4-72, and SK4-72//pXW1803. SK4-72 is dacA disrupted mutant. SK4-72/pXW1803 is dacA-complemented strain. For (A,B), the experiments were performed in biological triplicates. Error bars indicate the standard deviations. One-way ANOVA was used to examine the mean differences between the data groups. ns, no significant difference; *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.005; ****p < 0.001.
Figure 6D-Ala-D-Ala carboxypeptidase DacB, DacC, and DacD do not participate in the synthesis of prodigiosin. (A) Predicted domain structures of S. marcescens D-Ala-D-Ala Carboxypeptidase DacB, DacC, and DacD. (B) Effect of dacB, dacC, and dacD deletion on prodigiosin production and cell growth. Red lines represent the prodigiosin production and blue lines represent biomass (OD600). The experiments were performed in biological triplicates. Error bars indicate the standard deviations. JNB5-1 is wild-type strain, JNB5-1ΔDacB is dacB mutant. JNB5-1ΔDacC is dacC mutant, and JNB5-1ΔDacD is dacD mutant.
Microbial production of prodigiosin.
| Semi-defined medium [starch, 1.60% (m/v); peptone, 1.07% (m/v); and 1.00% of trace compounds (0.30% CuSO4 | 103.00 mg/L (shake flask) | Chen et al., | |
| Fermentation medium [yeast extract, 0.40% (m/v); D-Mannitol, 1.00% (m/v); and 0.40% of ram horn peptone (m/v)] | 277.74 mg/L (shake flask) | Kurbanoglu et al., | |
| Fermentation medium (peptone, 16.00 g/L; glycerol, 20.00 g/L; MgSO4, 1.20 g/L; glycine, 2.00 g/L; NaCl 2.00 g/L) | 6.50 ± 0.18 g/L (shake flask) | Liu et al., | |
| Fermentation medium [squid pen powder, 1.50% (m/v); MgSO4 | 2.48 g/L (shake flask) | Liang et al., | |
| Fermentation medium (6.00% cassava wastewater, and 2.00% mannitol) | 49.50 g/L (shake flask) | De Araujo et al., | |
| Fermentation medium (yeast extract, 5.00 g/L; proline, 10.00 g/L) | 2.50 g/L (shake flask) | Wei et al., | |
| Fermentation medium (yeast extract, 5.00 g/L; proline, 10.10 g/L; 6.0% sunflower oil) | 790.00 mg/L (shake flask) | Wei and Chen, | |
| Powdered peanut broth | 38.75 g/L (shake flask) | Giri et al., | |
| Nutrient broth medium supplemented with 1.00% lactose and 1.00% yeast extract | 0.76 g/L (shake flask) | Gondil et al., | |
| Fermentation medium (NaNO3, 2.00 g/L; K2HPO4, 1.00 g/L; KH2PO4, 1.0 g/L; CaCO3, 0.50 g/L; 20.00% of dairy processing wastewater, and 1.00% mannitol) | 47.00 g/L (shake flask) | El-Bondkly et al., | |
| Marine broth 2216 (MB; Difco) | 47.80 mg/L (shake flask) | Lee et al., | |
| Marine broth 2216 (MB; Difco) | 15.40 mg/L (shake flask) | Lee et al., | |
| Marine broth 2216 (MB; Difco) | 28.10 mg/L (shake flask) | Lee et al., | |
| Fermentation medium (sucrose, 10.00 g/L; peptone, 4.00 g/L; yeast extract, 1.00 g/L; NaCl, 20.00 g/L; Na2SO4, 9.00 g/L; CaCl2, 1.71 g/L; KCl, 0.40 g/L; H3BO3 10.00 mg/L; KBr, 50.00 mg/L; NaF, 2.00 mg/L; NaHCO3, 45.00 mg/L and Na2SiO3 8.10 mg/L) | 1.50 g/L (shake flask) | Kim et al., | |
| Fermentation medium (sucrose, 10.00 g/L; peptone, 8.00 g/L; yeast extract, 2.00 g/L; NaCl, 10.00 g/L; Na2SO4, 12.00 g/L; CaCl2, 1.80 g/L; MgCl2, 0.70 g/L; H3BO3 22.00 mg/L; Na2HPO4, 20.00 mg/L and Na2SiO3 8.00 mg/L) | 2.60 ± 0.18 g/L (shake flask) | Kim et al., | |
| Fermentation medium [Sucrose, 2.00% (m/v); Beef extract, 1.50% (m/v); CaCl2, 1.00% (m/v); L-proline, 0.75% (m/v); MgSO4.7H2O, 0.02% (m/v), and FeSO4.7H2O, 0.006% (m/v)] | 6.35 g/L (shake flask) | This study | |
| Fermentation medium [Sucrose, 2.00% (m/v); Beef extract, 1.50% (m/v); CaCl2, 1.00% (m/v); L-proline, 0.75% (m/v); MgSO4.7H2O, 0.02% (m/v), and FeSO4.7H2O, 0.006% (m/v)] | 15.63 g/L (shake flask) | This study |