Jun-Jie Wang1, Xin-Yi Gao2, Hong-Zhuo Li3, Shan-Shuang Du2. 1. Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi 046000, Shanxi Province, China. 2. Shaanxi Ophthalmic Medical Center, Xi'an No.4 Hospital, Affiliated Guangren Hospital, School of Medicine, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710004, Shaanxi Province, China. 3. Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi 046000, Shanxi Province, China.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of besifloxacin for treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. METHODS: A comprehensive search in PubMed, EMBASE Web of Science, Cochrane Central Database and CNKI was undertaken for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing besifloxacin with other treatments or placebo. The primary outcome measures were clinical resolution, rates of bacterial eradication, individual clinical outcomes, cure rates, and bacterial eradication rates of different kinds of pathogens. Safety outcomes were the number of adverse effects (AEs). The final search was performed on August 2018. RESULTS: Six RCTs were included. Four studies compared the efficacy and safety of besifloxacin with placebo, 1 study compared besifloxacin with moxifloxacin, and 1 study compared besifloxacin with gatifloxacin. A total of 2780 patients met the inclusion criteria. Besifloxacin presented higher efficacy and safety than did placebo in clinical resolution, rates of bacterial eradication, individual clinical outcomes, cure rates, bacterial eradication rates of different kinds of pathogens and the number of AEs. There was no significant difference between besifloxacin and moxifloxacin or gatifloxacin in the comparison items mentioned above. CONCLUSION: Besifloxacin is highly effective and safe for treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. Further comparative trials regarding the effect of besifloxacin for treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis will aid in treatment decisions. International Journal of Ophthalmology Press.
AIM: To evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of besifloxacin for treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. METHODS: A comprehensive search in PubMed, EMBASE Web of Science, Cochrane Central Database and CNKI was undertaken for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing besifloxacin with other treatments or placebo. The primary outcome measures were clinical resolution, rates of bacterial eradication, individual clinical outcomes, cure rates, and bacterial eradication rates of different kinds of pathogens. Safety outcomes were the number of adverse effects (AEs). The final search was performed on August 2018. RESULTS: Six RCTs were included. Four studies compared the efficacy and safety of besifloxacin with placebo, 1 study compared besifloxacin with moxifloxacin, and 1 study compared besifloxacin with gatifloxacin. A total of 2780 patients met the inclusion criteria. Besifloxacin presented higher efficacy and safety than did placebo in clinical resolution, rates of bacterial eradication, individual clinical outcomes, cure rates, bacterial eradication rates of different kinds of pathogens and the number of AEs. There was no significant difference between besifloxacin and moxifloxacin or gatifloxacin in the comparison items mentioned above. CONCLUSION:Besifloxacin is highly effective and safe for treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. Further comparative trials regarding the effect of besifloxacin for treatment of acute bacterial conjunctivitis will aid in treatment decisions. International Journal of Ophthalmology Press.
Authors: Jesse DeLeon; Bruce E Silverstein; Catherine Allaire; Lynne S Gearinger; Kirk M Bateman; Timothy W Morris; Timothy L Comstock Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 2.859
Authors: Bruce E Silverstein; Catherine Allaire; Kirk M Bateman; Lynne S Gearinger; Timothy W Morris; Timothy L Comstock Journal: Clin Ther Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.393
Authors: Michael E Tepedino; Warren H Heller; Dale W Usner; Lynne S Brunner; Timothy W Morris; Wolfgang Haas; Michael R Paterno; Timothy L Comstock Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 2.580
Authors: Penny A Asbell; Christine M Sanfilippo; Christopher M Pillar; Heleen H DeCory; Daniel F Sahm; Timothy W Morris Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Alexander Silvester; Timothy Neal; Gabriela Czanner; Michael Briggs; Simon Harding; Stephen Kaye Journal: BMJ Open Ophthalmol Date: 2016-11-11