| Literature DB >> 31849851 |
Dongfang Li1,2, Yinhu Li3, Wenkui Dai2, Huihui Wang4, Chuangzhao Qiu2, Su Feng5, Qian Zhou3, Wenjian Wang6, Xin Feng2, Kaihu Yao7, Yanhong Liu2, Yonghong Yang2,6,7, Zhenyu Yang2, Ximing Xu5, Shuaicheng Li3, Jurong Wei4, Ke Zhou1.
Abstract
Undernutrition (UN) is a worldwide concern affecting morbidity and mortality among children, but the safety and long-term efficacy of its current treatments remain controversial. Recent evidence showing the roles of the gut microbiome (GM) in nutrient absorption indicates its usefulness in alternative interventions to treat UN safely with sustainable amelioration. To enhance our understanding of the GM and childhood undernutrition, we deep sequenced the gut metagenomes of 65 children with moderate or severe undernutrition (UN group) and 61 healthy children (HC group) to identify associated taxa and genes using a two-stage validation scheme. At stage I, 54 UN patients and 51 healthy children were enrolled for the discovery of GM markers in UN children. The accuracy of the markers was then tested in an additional 11 UN patients and 10 healthy children at stage II. Compared to the HC group, the UN group had lower richness in microbial genes (P = 0.005, FDR = 0.005) and species (P = 0.002, FDR = 0.002). The distributions of bacterial genes enable the identification of 16 gene markers with which to discriminate UN patients with high accuracy [averaged areas under the receiver operating curve (AUC) = 0.87], including three Bacteroides uniformis genes that are responsible for the synthesis of iron transporters. We also identified four species markers that enable the UN patients to be confidently discriminated from the HC children (averaged AUC = 0.91), namely Bacteroides ovatus, Bacteroides uniformis, Bacteroides uniformis, and Bacteroides vulgatus. In addition, metabolic comparison showed significantly decreased isobutyric acid (P = 0.005, FDR = 0.017) and increased isovaleric acid (P = 0.006, FDR = 0.017) in UN patients. We also identified notable correlations between microbial species and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and several nutritional indicators, including acetic acid and iron (r = 0.436, P = 0.029), butyric acid and iron (r = 0.422, P = 0.036), butyric acid and lymphocyte (r = -0.309, P = 0.011), and acetic acid and total protein (r = -0.303, P = 0.043). Taken together, the distinct features of gut microbiota in UN patients highlight the taxonomic and functional shift during the development of UN and provide a solid theoretical basis for intervention in childhood undernutrition through gut microbes.Entities:
Keywords: Bacteroides; childhood undernutrition; gut microbiome markers; iron transporter; nutritional indicators
Year: 2019 PMID: 31849851 PMCID: PMC6895006 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02635
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Flow diagram of participant selection and data acquisition. ∗Means the data was only obtained in the UN patients.
Demographic and physical features of the 126 study subjects.
| Gender (male) | 22 | 26 | 0.392 | 5 | 5 | 1 | χ2 test |
| Age (month) | 13.5 ± 9.5 | 18.8 ± 9.7 | 0.005 | 15.2 ± 9.3 | 20.3 ± 13.7 | 0.335 | |
| Delivery pattern | 0.034 | 0.561 | χ2 test | ||||
| Cesarean | 24 | 21 | 6 | 5 | |||
| Vaginally | 30 | 24 | 5 | 4 | |||
| ND∗ | 0 | 6 | 0 | 1 | |||
| Feeding pattern | 0.253 | 0.581 | χ2 test | ||||
| Breastfeeding | 29 | 22 | 7 | 5 | |||
| Formula feeding | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | |||
| Mixed | 11 | 19 | 2 | 4 | |||
| ND∗ | 8 | 7 | 1 | 1 | |||
| Weight to age Z score (%) | [−7.49, −2.01] | [−1.56, 4.83] | <0.001 | [−5.6, −2.05] | [−1.25, 1.30] | <0.001 | Wilcoxon rank- sum test |
FIGURE 2Differences in GM features between UN and HC children. Comparisons on gene richness (A), Shannon index (B), and species richness (C) were executed between 54 UN patients and 51 HC children; their values in these two groups are represented by red and green boxes respectively. Significant differences are indicated with ∗∗P < 0.01.
FIGURE 3Bacterial gene markers and their validation accuracy for the discrimination of UN patients. (A) Following the optimal variation numbers indicated by Random Forest classifiers, 16 gene biomarkers with Gini values applied to indicate their contributions to the discrimination between the UN group and the HC group classification, were selected at stage I. (B) These gene markers were tested in the samples from stage II, and their AUC values were calculated. The ROC curves were drawn with five repeats in different colors. (C) The log10 relative abundances of the gene markers were detected for all samples; the species, KEGG pathways, and functions corresponding to the biomarkers are also exhibited.
FIGURE 4Species markers and their accuracy in differentiating the UN group from the HC group. (A) Four species were identified for the optimal classification of the HC and UN children at stage I; the Gini values are plotted. (B) The accuracy of the species markers was evaluated by using the samples from stage II, and ROC curves were drawn with five repeats in different colors along with AUC values. (C) The relative abundances of the biomarkers in all samples are shown with a heatmap.
FIGURE 5Correlations among GM, SCFAs, and nutritional indicators. (A) The positive and negative relationships between GM and SCFAs are exhibited with red and blue boxes, respectively. Significant relationships are indicated with “∗” or “+.” ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, +FDR < 0.05, and + + + FDR < 0.001. Species labeled in red or blue were enriched in the UN or HC groups, and, for species labeled in gray, no significant differences were observed between these two groups. (B) The relationships between SCFAs and nutritional indicators were also explored. Red and blue boxes stand for positive and negative relationships, respectively, and ∗P < 0.05. (C) Comparison between the concentrations of SCFAs of the UN and HC groups. ∗∗P < 0.01.