| Literature DB >> 31849716 |
Harshvardhan Singh1, Stephen J Carter2, Shannon L Mathis3, David R Bryan4, David M Koceja2, John P McCarthy1, Gary R Hunter4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Secondary analyses were performed to test whether combined aerobic and resistance training altered walking economy (i.e., net oxygen uptake) and/or stretch-shortening cycle potentiation (SSCP). A further objective was to determine if walking economy and SSCP were related before or after training.Entities:
Keywords: elastic energy; exercise; muscle contraction; postmenopausal; potentiation; walking
Year: 2019 PMID: 31849716 PMCID: PMC6892748 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01472
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Participant characteristics at baseline (n = 92).
| Age (year) | 65 ± 4 |
| Height (m) | 1.65 ± 0.06 |
| Body mass (kg) | 73.8 ± 11.4 |
| Body fat (%) | 42.6 ± 6.1 |
| 22.8 ± 4.6 | |
| CM velocity (ms–1) | 0.90 ± 0.12 |
| CO velocity (ms–1) | 0.77 ± 0.12 |
| net | 7.3 ± 1.28 |
Differences in physiological and functional parameters for each respective groups.
| Age (yr) | 66 ± 4 | 64 ± 3 | 64 ± 3 ( | |||||||
| Height (cm) | 167 ± 6 | 165 ± 5 | 164 ± 4 ( | |||||||
| Body mass (kg) | 76.3 ± 11.4 | 76.4 ± 11.4 | 0.13 | 74.9 ± 9.4 | 73.7 ± 9.1 | 1.6 | 67.8 ± 9.6 ( | 67.60 ± 9.7 | 0.29 | |
| Body fat (%) | 44.1 ± 5.3 | 43.6 ± 5.7 | 1.13 | 42.8 ± 4.7 | 41.1 ± 4.8 | 3.97 | 40.1 ± 5.8 ( | 38.5 ± 6.7 | 3.99 | |
| 21.0 ± 2.9 | 21.7 ± 3.7 | 3.33 | 23.0 ± 4.6 ( | 24.9 ± 3.8 | 8.2 | 24.0 ± 4.3 ( | 24.5 ± 5.1 | 2.08 | ||
| CM velocity (m.s–1) | 0.89 ± 0.12 ( | 0.93 ± 0.12 | 4.49 | 0.91 ± 0.10 ( | 0.96 ± 0.10 | 5.5 | 0.88 ± 0.11 ( | 0.93 ± 0.13 | 5.68 | |
| CO velocity (m.s–1) | 0.78 ± 0.13 ( | 0.80 ± 0.12 | 2.56 | 0.78 ± 0.10 ( | 0.78 ± 0.13 | 0.0 | 0.75 ± 0.14 ( | 0.81 ± 0.11 | 8.0 | |
| net | 7.5 ± 1.5 | 6.6 ± 0.9 | 12.0 | 7.3 ± 1.3 ( | 6.7 ± 1.5 | 8.22 | 7.1 ± 1.1 ( | 6.7 ± 1.5 | 5.63 | |
| Heart rate (beats⋅min–1) | 108 ± 14 | 97 ± 8 | 10.18 | 101 ± 14 ( | 94 ± 14 | 6.93 | 101 ± 12 | 94 ± 10 | 6.93 | |
FIGURE 1Mean ± standard error of group values for stretch-shortening cycle potentiation (SSCP) captured by the pre-training versus post-training difference in a concentric only and counter-movement leg press throw. Note the significant increase in group 2 where: Group 1: 1 d⋅wk–1 of resistance training and 1 d⋅wk–1 of aerobic training (n = 23); Group 2: 2 d⋅wk–1 of resistance training and 2 d⋅wk–1 of aerobic training (n = 30); Group 3: 3 d⋅wk–1 of resistance training and 3 d⋅wk–1 of aerobic training (n = 23). ∗p = 0.03.
Multiple linear regression model of walking net versus stretch-shortening cycle potentiation (SSCP) and relative exercise intensity (%) at baseline (n = 92) and post-training (n = 68).
| 0.32 | 5.0 | <0.01 | ||||
| SSCP | –2.88 | –0.22 | <0.04 | |||
| Percentage | 6.00 | 0.54 | <0.01 | |||
| 0.25 | 3.2 | <0.01 | ||||
| SSCP | 2.37 | 0.18 | 0.12 | |||
| Percentage | 7.84 | 0.49 | <0.01 |