Literature DB >> 31848995

Human relationships in patients' end-of-life: a qualitative study in a hospice ward.

Marika Lo Monaco1,2,3, Raffaella Mallaci Bocchio1,2, Giuseppe Natoli1,2, Salvatore Scibetta1, Teresa Bongiorno1, Christiano Argano1, Salvatore Corrao4,5,6,7,8,9.   

Abstract

Living in a hospice department is an intense experience for patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals. End-of-life care aims to conduct vulnerable dying patients towards a painless and peaceful death. The importance of a strong staff-patient relationship and the perspective of pain and suffering from patients has already been studied. This study aimed to explore patients' inner needs living in hospice through a qualitative research approach. A descriptive qualitative study was conducted in the hospice department at ARNAS Civico in Palermo, Italy. From a qualitative research point of view, a significant sample of ten dying patients was interviewed. Data were collected until saturation by in-depth interview using a semi-structured interview guide, and Colaizzi's method was used. Five themes emerged: experiencing hospice, hospice staff, family role, coping with the disease, and death. Human relationships seem to represent a fundamental key in patients' end-of-life, especially in their family fondness. Predictably, terminally ill patients seem to fear pain and incoming death. Even though patients had everything they needed in the hospice, their main thoughts were always focused on human relationships. End-of-life medicine should improve the quality of time that each patient could spend with significant others to improve end-of-life care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hospice and palliative care nursing; Hospice care; Needs assessment; Qualitative research; Terminal care

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31848995     DOI: 10.1007/s11739-019-02254-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


  6 in total

1.  Symptom burden in palliative care patients: perspectives of patients, their family caregivers, and their attending physicians.

Authors:  Karin Oechsle; Kathrin Goerth; Carsten Bokemeyer; Anja Mehnert
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Sample size in qualitative research.

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  An interpretative phenomenological analysis exploring the lived experience of individuals dying from terminal cancer in Ireland.

Authors:  Kara McTiernan; Michael O'Connell
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2014-05-08

Review 4.  Patient Perspectives of Dignity, Autonomy and Control at the End of Life: Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.

Authors:  Andrea Rodríguez-Prat; Cristina Monforte-Royo; Josep Porta-Sales; Xavier Escribano; Albert Balaguer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Intentions in wishes to die: analysis and a typology--a report of 30 qualitative case studies of terminally ill cancer patients in palliative care.

Authors:  K Ohnsorge; H Gudat; C Rehmann-Sutter
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Sex-Differences in the Pattern of Comorbidities, Functional Independence, and Mortality in Elderly Inpatients: Evidence from the RePoSI Register.

Authors:  Salvatore Corrao; Christiano Argano; Giuseppe Natoli; Alessandro Nobili; Gino Roberto Corazza; Pier Mannuccio Mannucci; Francesco Perticone
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-01-12       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Pattern of comorbidities and 1-year mortality in elderly patients with COPD hospitalized in internal medicine wards: data from the RePoSI Registry.

Authors:  Christiano Argano; Nicola Scichilone; Giuseppe Natoli; Alessandro Nobili; Gino Roberto Corazza; Pier Mannuccio Mannucci; Francesco Perticone; Salvatore Corrao
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Disability and the risk of subsequent mortality in elderly: a 12-year longitudinal population-based study.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Zhaohui Du; Yafei Liu; Jiahui Lao; Xiaoru Sun; Fang Tang
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.921

3.  Rethinking clinical decision-making to improve clinical reasoning.

Authors:  Salvatore Corrao; Christiano Argano
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.