Severe Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with Allopurinol: An Analysis of Spontaneous Reporting System in Southern Italy.

BACKGROUND: Allopurinol can induce severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), including Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome, Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). AIMS AND METHODS: We analyzed the Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) sent from January 2001 until April 2019 to the Campania regional Center of Pharmacovigilance (Southern Italy) that reported allopurinol as suspected, with a focus on those reporting at least one serious cutaneous adverse drug reaction (ADR). This study was aimed to describe the main characteristics of all ADRs associated with allopurinol, analyze the proportion of serious cutaneous ADRs of total ICSRs related to allopurinol and to compare the main features (age, sex, seriousness and outcome) of ICSRs that reported serious cutaneous ADRs with those that did not.
RESULTS: The Campania regional Center of Pharmacovigilance received 108 ICSRs that reported allopurinol as suspected. ADRs occurred more frequently in the elderly (median age: 71 years) and female patients (53.7%). Fifty-seven percent of all ADRs were classified as serious and 58% had a favorable outcome. Fifty-six ICSRs reported at least one serious cutaneous ADR; among these ICSRs, 37 cases of SCARs were found [DRESS syndrome (n = 3; 5.4%), SJS (n = 8; 14.3%) and TEN (n = 26; 46.4%)]. Serious cutaneous ADRs commonly occurred in the elderly (median age: 73 years) and female patients (62.5%). They frequently required hospitalization (75%) and had an unfavorable outcome (46%). No statistically significant differences were found between ICSRs that reported serious cutaneous ADRs and ICSRs that did not report serious cutaneous ADRs except for the seriousness degree "Hospitalization or its prolongation" and the outcome degrees "Unfavorable" and "Favorable".
CONCLUSION: This study found that 52% (56/108) of all ICSRs having allopurinol as a suspected drug were serious cutaneous ADRs. Serious cutaneous ADRs associated with allopurinol frequently required hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization, and almost half had an unfavorable outcome.

Keypoints

Introduction

Allopurinol, an inhibitor of xanthine oxidase, prevents the oxidation of xanthine to uric acid. It is indicated for the treatment of clinical manifestations of hyperuricemia and its complications, including chronic gout, uric acid lithiasis and acute uric acid nephropathy [1]. Hyperuricemia may have several underlying causes; the most common are diseases that induce an overproduction of urate or its inefficient excretion by the kidneys (i.e. myeloproliferative disorders, exfoliative psoriasis or renal insufficiency) and medications that impair the renal urate clearance. Indeed, several studies showed that patients with moderate-high levels of uric acid were likely to use a larger number of antihypertensive and diuretic drugs compared to patients with normal uric acid levels [2-6].

During the treatment with allopurinol, patients may commonly experience rash, gout flares, gastrointestinal symptoms, elevation in hepatic enzymes, hematologic abnormalities and drowsiness [7]. In addition to these common adverse drug reactions (ADRs), allopurinol can also induce serious cutaneous ADRs, including severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) [8-11]. SCARs are defined as hypersensitivity reactions that are severe, unpredictable, and drug induced [12, 13]. Several types of SCARs were recognized, including Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome, Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), and generalized bullous fixed drug eruptions (GBFDE). Currently it is known that allopurinol can induce the occurrence of DRESS, SJS and TEN [14-17]. DRESS syndrome is a severe ADR, potentially life-threatening, presenting with skin eruption, hematological abnormalities (eosinophilia, atypical lymphocytosis) and multi-organ involvement [18]. TEN and SJS represent two of the most severe cutaneous ADRs associated with high morbidity and with mortality rates that range from 1 to 5% for SJS and 25-35% for TEN [19]. According to Dodiuk-Gad RP et al., these conditions represent different degrees of the same type of severe cutaneous ADR [20]. Indeed, TEN and SJS share common clinical manifestations, including flu-like symptoms (malaise, fever, anorexia), cutaneous and mucosal involvement, which can result in skin exfoliation, possible sepsis and death. SJS and TEN differ in the extent of detachment, which is usually limited in SJS (< 10% body surface area) while it is more widespread in TEN (> 30%) [21-23]. According to the information reported in the Summary of Products Characteristics (SPC) of allopurinol, the association of this drug with ampicillin/amoxicillin or thiazide diuretics increases the risk of SCARs [1]. Furthermore, given that SCARs have been shown to occur more frequently in HLA-B*5801 positive patients (1-2% of Caucasian population), the screening for HLA-B*5801 is recommended before the initiation of the therapy with allopurinol [1].

In conclusion, according to literature: cutaneous ADRs are responsible for about 2% of hospital admissions; SCARs are of major concern because of high mortality and morbidity rates; SCARs still represent a challenge for healthcare providers mainly due to absence of accurate and standardized biomarkers that delays the diagnosis; hypouricaemic drugs represent one of the drug classes most frequently associated with serious cutaneous ADRs (including SCARs) [24-28]. Based on that, we carried out a study evaluating the safety profile of allopurinol, with a focus on serious cutaneous ADRs (including SCARs), in real life conditions in the Campania Region using data from the Italian spontaneous reporting system.

We analyzed Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) that reported allopurinol as suspected drug in order to: perform a descriptive analysis of all ADRs; describe the proportion of serious cutaneous ADRs (including SCARs) of total ICSRs related to allopurinol; compare the main characteristics of patients (age and sex) who experienced serious cutaneous ADRs with those that presented other ADRs after allopurinol administration; compare the main features of serious cutaneous ADRs with other ADRs in term of seriousness and outcome; provide an overview of SCAR cases.

Methods

Data Source

The Italian spontaneous reporting system is based on a national pharmacovigilance database (Rete Nazionale di Farmacovigilanza—RNF), which was established by the Italian regulatory agency (Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco—AIFA) in 2001. According to the national rules, each Italian region shall carry out post-marketing surveillance activities, including those related to the collection and analysis of ICSRs, through a regional Center of Pharmacovigilance. The Campania regional Center of Pharmacovigilance was activated with the implementation of Legislative Decree No. 95 of 2003 and the Resolution No. 2530 of August 6th 2003 [29].

Data Analysis

ICSRs received by the Campania regional Center of Pharmacovigilance from January 1st 2001 to April 15th 2019 that reported allopurinol as suspected were evaluated. Then we focused our analysis on ICSRs that reported at least one serious cutaneous ADR, defined by the SOC “Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders” and by a seriousness degree equal to serious (serious—death”; “serious—hospitalization or its prolongation”; “serious-persistent or significant disability or incapacity”; “serious—life-threatening”; “serious—congenital anomaly/birth defect”; “serious—clinically relevant”). Among those ICSRs we searched for cases of DRESS syndrome, SJS, TEN, AGEP and GBFDE.

We performed a descriptive analysis of all ICSRs (those that reported serious cutaneous ADRs and those that did not) stratifying by median age (IQR), sex, seriousness, and outcome. Only for ICSRs reporting SCARs we performed a descriptive analysis in terms of time to event (TTE), types of suspected drugs other than allopurinol, concomitant medications, therapeutic indication, source of report (healthcare professional, patient/citizen, pharmaceutical company),and causality assessment. As described in the ICH-E2A (Good Pharmacovigilance Practices Annex IV), the seriousness of ADRs was categorized as: serious-death; serious-hospitalization or its prolongation; serious-persistent or significant disability or incapacity; serious-life-threat; serious-congenital anomaly/birth defect; serious-clinically relevant; not serious; not defined [30, 31]. The outcome was categorized as favorable (completely resolved or improved) or unfavorable (resolved with sequelae, unchanged or death).

All the Italian Regional Centers of Pharmacovigilance (including the Campania one) use the Naranjo algorithm in order to establish the strength of the relationship between a suspected drug and ADR(s). Therefore, as part of the routine pharmacovigilance activities of the Campania regional Center of Pharmacovigilance, the Naranjo algorithm was applied for ICSRs reporting serious cutaneous ADRs evaluated in this study. All scores ranged between possible and certain reports were considered reasonable for causality.

Safety data deriving from the Italian spontaneous reporting system are anonymous and in compliance with the ethical standard. Therefore, no further ethical measures were required.

Statistical Analysis

Chi-squared analysis with Mann–Whitney U test or Fisher exact test, where appropriate, was employed to examine differences between ICSRs that reported serious cutaneous ADRs and ICSRs that reported other ADRs, with a 5% significance level. Data were analyzed using the Microsoft Excel program.

Results

Overall Results

From January 1st, 2001 until April 15th, 2019 the Campania regional Center of Pharmacovigilance received 108 ICSRs that reported allopurinol as suspected. ADRs mainly occurred in elderly patients (median age: 71 years; IQR: 61–80) and in a slightly higher percentage of women compared to men (53.7% vs. 45.4%). Overall, 57% of ICSRs reported ADRs that were considered as serious and 40% reported ADRs that were classified as not serious. The outcome was favorable in 58% of cases and unfavorable in 28% (Table 1).

Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics of individual case safety reports having allopurinol as suspected drug sent through the Campania Region spontaneous reporting system from January 2001 to April 2019

Variable	Level	All ICSRs (n = 108)	ICSRs reporting serious cutaneous ADRs (including SCARs) (n = 56)	ICSRs not reporting serious cutaneous ADRs (n = 52)	p value (< 0.05)
Age, years	Median (IQR)	71 (61–80)	73 (63.5–80)	68 (56.25–79)	0.095b
Sex	Female	58 (53.7)	35 (62.5)	23 (44)	0.054c
	Male	49 (45.4)	20 (35.7)	29 (56)
	Missing	1 (0.9)	1 (1.8)	–
Seriousness	Hospitalization or its prolongationa	43 (40)	42 (75)	1 (2)	< 0.001c
	Clinically relevanta	10 (9)	5 (9)	5 (10)	0.902
	Death	6 (5)	6 (11)	–	–
	Life-threateninga	3 (3)	3 (5)	–	–
	Not serious	43 (40)	–	43 (82)	–
	Not defined	3 (3)	–	3 (6)	–
Outcome	Unfavorable (death or unchanged)	30 (28)	26 (46)	4 (8)	< 0.001
	Favorable (completely resolved or improved)	63 (58)	23 (41)	40 (77)	< 0.001
	Not available	15 (14)	7 (12)	8 (15)	–

Values are n (%) unless otherwise stated

ADRs adverse drug reactions, ICSRs individual case safety reports, IQR interquartile range, SCARS severe cutaneous adverse reactions

aSome of these cases may have resulted in patient’s death

bMann–Whitney U test

cFisher exact test

Out of 108 ICSRs that reported allopurinol as suspected, 56 reported serious cutaneous ADRs (including 37 cases of SCARs) (Tables 1 and 2, Fig. 1). Compared to ICSRs not reporting serious cutaneous ADRs, the median age of patients who experienced a serious cutaneous ADR was similar (68 vs. 73; difference not statistically significant). Furthermore, while serious cutaneous ADRs occurred more frequently in women compared to men (62.5% vs. 35.7%), other ADRs were more common in males (56% vs. 44%; difference not statistically significant). Furthermore, we found statistically significant differences in the rate of unfavorable and favorable outcomes of serious cutaneous ADRs versus other ADRs (46% vs. 8% and 41% vs. 77%, respectively; p < 0.001 for both) (Table 1). All ICSRs reporting serious cutaneous ADRs came from healthcare professionals (data not shown).

Table 2

Individual case safety reports related to DRESS, SJS and TEN cases having allopurinol as suspected drug and sent through Campania Region spontaneous reporting system from January 2001 to April 2019

Case n.	Age (years)	TTE (days)	Outcome	Therapeutic indication of allopurinol	Suspected drug(s) other than allopurinol	Number of concomitant drugs	Causality assessment
DRESS Syndrome
1	82	3	Unfavorable-U	Hyperuricemia	–	3	Possible
2	80	40	Unfavorable-U	Gout	Levofloxacin	7	Possible
3	57	49	Favorable -I	Hyperuricemia	Cholecalciferol	4	Possible
SJS
1	67	4	Favorable-CR	Hyperuricemia	–	6	Possible
2	84	10	Favorable-I	Hyperuricemia	Piperacillin	9	Possible
3	38	12	Unfavorable-U	Hyperuricemia	–	0	Probable
4	73	13	Unfavorable-U	Hyperuricemia	Flu vaccine	4	Possible
5	57	16	Unfavorable-U	Hyperuricemia	–	0	Probable
6	69	19	Favorable-I	Hyperuricemia	–	3	Possible
7	81	26	NA	Hyperuricemia	–	4	Possible
8	81	4288	NA	Other therapeutic indications	Amoxicillin and clavulanic acid	7	Possible
TEN
1	78	3	Favorable-I	Hyperuricemia	–	0	Probable
2	68	60	Unfavorable-D	Hyperuricemia	Bortezomib, sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, acyclovir	2	Possible
3	67	30	Unfavorable-U	Other therapeutic indications	Rituximab	4	Possible
4	81	4380	Unfavorable-D	Hyperuricemia	Amoxicillin and clavulanic acid	12	Possible
5	71	20	Unfavorable-D	Gout	–	5	Possible
6	73	27	NA	Hyperuricemia	Ceftriaxone, levofloxacin	5	Possible
7	78	730	NA	Gout	–	4	Probable
8	72	365	NA	Hyperuricemia	–	1	Possible
9	77	30	Unfavorable-D	Hyperuricemia	–	7	Possible
10	79	33	Unfavorable-D	Hyperuricemia	Carvedilol	4	Possible
11	79	9	Unfavorable-U	Hyperuricemia	Carvedilol	3	Possible
12	82	31	Unfavorable-D	Hyperuricemia	–	8	Possible
13	80	60	Unfavorable-D	Gout	Ciprofloxacin	3	Possible
14	71	6	Unfavorable-U	Hyperuricemia	–	1	Possible
15	55	13	Favorable-I	Gout	Diclofenac	0	Possible
16	81	11	Unfavorable-U	Hyperuricemia	–	4	Possible
17	86	NA	Unfavorable-D	Hyperuricemia	Macrogol	3	Probable
18	61	8	Unfavorable-D	Hyperuricemia	–	4	Possible
19	74	40	Unfavorable-U	Other therapeutic indications	Ceftriaxone	10	Possible
20	71	52	Unfavorable-U	Other therapeutic indications	Ketorolac	7	Possible
21	81	10	Favorable-I	Hyperuricemia	–	3	Possible
22	63	128	Unfavorable-D	Hyperuricemia	Bortezomib	8	Possible
23	77	NA	Unfavorable-D	Not indicated	Brentuximab vedotin	6	Possible
24	74	58	Unfavorable-D	Hyperuricemia	–	9	Possible
25	55	24	Unfavorable-U	Gout	Nimesulide	1	Possible
26	65	4	Unfavorable-D	Gout	–	11	Possible

DRESS Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms, Favorable CR completely resolved, Favorable I improved, NA not available, SJS Stevens–Johnson syndrome, TEN toxic epidermal necrolysis, TTE time to event, Unfavorable D death, Unfavorable U unchanged

Other therapeutic indications: these conditions included renal failure, hemolytic anemia and hyperazotemia

Fig. 1

Flowchart of ICSRs related to serious cutaneous ADRs associated with allopurinol in the Campania Region. The number of cases that resulted in death referred to the outcome of the ADR; therefore, this number (n = 13) is higher compared to the number reported in Table 1 since 7 ICSRs that led to patient’s hospitalization or its prolongation resulted in patient’s death

According to the therapeutic indications reported in ICSRs reporting serious cutaneous ADRs, allopurinol was used for the treatment of hyperuricemia (n = 36; 64.3%), gout (n = 8; 14.3%) or other therapeutic indications, including renal failure, hemolytic anemia and hyperazotemia (n = 8; 14.3%); in 4 ICSRs (7.1%) the therapeutic indication was not reported (data not shown). Allopurinol was the only medication indicated as suspected in 57% of ICSRs reporting serious cutaneous ADRs; in the remaining ones, other medications were instead reported, including antihypertensive drugs (ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, loop diuretics, and therapeutic associations with hydrochlorothiazide), antibiotics (amoxicillin and clavulanic acid, ceftriaxone, levofloxacin), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs—diclofenac, ketorolac, nimesulide), antiplatelet therapy, and anti-cancer drugs (data not shown). Concomitant medications were reported in 89% of ICSRs reporting serious cutaneous ADRs; these were mainly represented by antihypertensive, lipid lowering drugs and proton-pump inhibitors (data not shown).

SCAR Cases

Out of 56 ICSRs reporting serious cutaneous ADRs, 34% (n = 19) referred to ADRs that were represented by cases of desquamative erythema, rash, skin swelling, and urticaria (data not shown).

The remaining 66% (n = 37) of serious cutaneous ADRs referred to cases of SCARs [DRESS syndrome (n = 3; 5.4%), SJS (n = 8; 14.3%) and TEN (n = 26; 46.4%)] (Fig. 1 and Table 2). No cases of AGEP and GBFDE were reported to the Campania regional Center of Pharmacovigilance.

Three cases of DRESS syndrome associated with allopurinol were sent to the Campania Regional Center of Pharmacovigilance. Patients’ age was 82, 80 and 57 years for case n. 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The TTE was 3, 40 and 49 days for case n. 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The outcome of the ADR was unfavorable for cases n. 1 and 2. Levofloxacin and cholecalciferol were indicated as second suspected drugs in case n. 2 and 3. All patients were concomitantly receiving at least 3 medications. The sex ratio (male-to-female) for DRESS cases was 2:0 (sex was not reported in one case).

Eight cases of SJS associated with allopurinol were received by our Center. Patients’ age ranged from 38 to 84 years. Except for the case n. 8, all SJS cases occurred within the first 4 weeks from the beginning of the allopurinol therapy. The outcome was favorable in 3 cases, unfavorable in 3 cases and not available for the remaining 2 cases. Cases n. 2, 4 and 8 had further suspected drugs, including antibiotics. All cases, apart from cases n. 3 and 5, reported at least 3 concomitant medications. The sex ratio (male-to-female) for SJS cases was 0.6:1.

Finally, we received twenty-six cases of TEN associated with allopurinol. Patients’ age ranged from 55 to 86 years. TTE was extremely variable, ranging from 3 days (case n. 1) to 4380 days (case n. 4) from the beginning of the allopurinol therapy. The occurrence of the ADR was followed by the patient’s death in 13 cases. Fourteen ICSRs reported further suspected drugs, including antibiotics, beta-blockers and NSAIDs. All cases, except for cases n. 1 and 15, reported at least one concomitant medication. The sex ratio (male-to-female) for TEN cases was 0.3:1.

Apart from SJS cases n. 3 and 5 and TEN cases n. 1, 7 and 17 (for which the causality assessment resulted in probable), the causality assessment resulted in possible in all ICSRs (Table 2).

Discussion

In our study ADRs associated with allopurinol mainly occurred in elderly patients. This is not surprising if we consider that diseases for which allopurinol is indicated (mainly gout and hyperuricemia) usually affect patients older than 40 years of age. Together with ageing, male sex, metabolic syndrome and medications are among risk factors leading to the occurrence of these clinical conditions [32, 33]. Whilst men have an increased risk of gout and hyperuricemia and, therefore, are more prone to be treated with allopurinol, we found that ADRs, especially serious cutaneous ADRs, were more common in women. This is not surprising because females seem to be more likely at risk to experience ADRs due to sex-specific differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs [34-37]. Furthermore, literature data confirm that both SJS and TEN could occur at any age, but appear to be more prevalent in adults, with a slight predominance in women [38, 39]. In line with our findings, the results of two European studies based on the Portuguese Central Health System Administration and on the Spanish Pharmacovigilance database found that both SJS and TEN were more common in female patients [27, 40]. In our study, among patients who experienced DRESS syndrome, 2 were males while for one case the sex was not reported. Even though a sex predominance among DRESS cases of our study cannot be established, due to the very limited number of cases, the results of a recent retrospective study based on data from electronic medical records for patients who developed drug-induced cutaneous ADRs between 2008 to 2018 showed a male preponderance in DRESS cases (12 cases in males vs. 7 cases in females) [41]. It must be stressed, however, that a study carried out by Agier et al. using data from the French Pharmacovigilance Database revealed that DRESS occurred more commonly in women with a sex ratio (male-to-female) equal to 0.9:1 [42]. Moreover, few case reports reported the occurrence of DRESS syndrome in female patients treated with allopurinol [43-46].

In our study, ADRs were mainly classified as serious (57%). Literature data seem to suggest that serious ADRs associated with allopurinol are rare [47]. Compared to all ADRs associated with allopurinol, serious cutaneous ADRs more commonly presented unfavorable outcomes (46%). In line with our results, Kim et al. [48] showed that although the incidence of hospitalization due to the occurrence of SCARs is < 1/1000 person-year, the in-hospital mortality is around 27%. Further studies confirmed that SCARs frequently led to patients’ hospitalization and unfavorable outcomes [49-52] and that these ADRs were often acute emergencies [53]. However, a reporting bias cannot be ruled out. Indeed, all serious cutaneous ADRs in our study were reported by healthcare professionals and, according to the results of a systematic review of Inácio et al. healthcare professionals seem to be especially prone to report more serious ADRs that result in hospitalization, are life-threatening or result in death [54].

Among cases of serious cutaneous ADRs, allopurinol was mainly used for the treatment of hyperuricemia and patients were frequently receiving other medications, including antihypertensive drugs. It is well known that antihypertensive medications may induce both hyperuricemia and gout as a iatrogenic effect [55-57].

According to our results, 43% of ICSRs reporting serious cutaneous ADRs reported other suspected drugs besides allopurinol and 89% reported concomitant medications. These data are not surprising if we consider that our patients that experienced SCARs were mainly elders and that this population shows higher prevalence of chronic diseases leading to the complex polypharmacy [58].

Among 56 ICSRs reporting serious cutaneous ADRs, we have found 37 cases of SCARs and 19 serious cutaneous ADRs that were mainly represented by desquamative erythema, rash and urticaria. In line with our results, Tsai TF et al. showed that the most common ADR associated with allopurinol is skin maculopapular eruption that occurs in almost 1.5% of treated patients [9, 10]. Similarly, allopurinol was identified as the suspect drug in 84 cutaneous ADRs, which mainly included cases of maculopapular eruptions, SJS/TEN, vasculitis, DRESS syndrome, AGEP, Pityriasis rosea-like eruption, lichenoid dermatitis, fixed drug eruption, and erythroderma, at one Dermatology Department in Sardinia (Italian island) [59].

In our study 37 ICSRs reported cases of DRESS syndrome, SJS and TEN. Drug-induced SCARs are of major medical concern because they are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Literature documents that allopurinol carries a well-known risk of SCARs [47]. The incidence of SCARs in patients treated with allopurinol has been reported to be 0.69 (95% CI 0.52, 0.92) per 1000 person-years [48]. The incidence of SJS and TEN is estimated 1.0-6.0 per million and 0.4–1.2 per million, respectively, while the incidence of DRESS is still unclear, with an estimated overall population risk between 1 in 1000 and 1 in 10,000 drug exposures [60, 61].

Except for few cases, SCARs usually occurred within the first 2 months from the beginning of the allopurinol therapy. In line with our findings, literature data showed that the TTE for drug-induced DRESS syndrome, SJS or TEN is extremely variable, ranging from 10 days to 2 months [38, 39, 62]. Therefore, the risk of developing these ADRs after drug exposure appears to be the greatest during the initial weeks of treatment. A dose-dependent increase of the risk of SJS and TEN in patients taking 200 mg or more of allopurinol per day was found [63, 64]. Among our ICSRs, 4 cases (SJS case n. 8, and TEN cases n. 4, 7 and 8) had a TTE that exceeded 365 days indicating that even though SCARs usually develop within weeks or few months, longer delays may occur. To our knowledge, only one study reported a TTE that reach almost 2 years of treatment [65], but no explanation was found for such a long TTE. In our study, the majority of DRESS syndrome, SJS and TEN cases had an unfavorable outcome; in particular, out of 26 TEN cases, 13 resulted in patient’s death (all patients were receiving other suspected and/or concomitant drugs). According to literature, SJS and TEN are the most common and lethal of all SCARs. Both conditions are associated with a mortality of up to 40% compared to 10% for DRESS [66]. Negative outcomes may result from clinical complications such as infections due to skin exfoliation or systemic organ injury. SCARs may permanently damage mucosa and skin; among survivors of SJS/TEN, 50% have severe sequelae, including corneal scarring leading to visual impairment, perineal stricture, bronchiolitis, hair loss, and scarring [18, 19, 57, 67–69]. On the other hand, even though the outcome for DRESS syndrome is usually favorable after discontinuation of the suspect drug, full resolution may require at least 2 weeks and the prognosis depends on the severity of organ involvement [16, 17]. Furthermore, since most of our patients were elderly and were receiving medications other than allopurinol, the fatal outcomes are not surprising, considering the significant impact of SCARs on general health status of frail patients. Accordingly, a strong correlation between mortality due to SJS and TEN, patient’s age and the severity of the disease has been reported [70]. Similarly, a retrospective cross-sectional study, which involved patients with SJS and TEN, showed that the fatal outcome occurred in almost 67% of elderly patients [71]. A correlation between disease’ severity and age was found for DRESS syndrome as well. According to the results of a systematic review, patients with severe DRESS tended to be older than those recovering from DRESS [18]. Lastly, most of case reports and case series on patients presenting SJS and TEN reported a fatal outcome [72-75]. Of note, in our study two of the fatal TEN occurred in patients who were concomitantly treated with bortezomib, which itself is associated with the onset of TEN [76]. Lastly, the majority of ICSRs that we have analyzed reported other suspected and concomitant medications, including sulfonamides, anti-epileptic, anticancer drugs, and NSAIDs, most of which have been identified as causative agents in developing SCARs. Also, the hypothetical role of concomitant medications in the development of hyperuricemia cannot be ruled out. Moreover, the concomitant administration of 2 or more high-risk drugs, such as those able to induce T cell-dependent reactions (like levofloxacin), can increase the likelihood of developing SCARs [77, 78].

Study Strengths and Limitations

It is well known that post-marketing surveillance has several limitations. Our study was based on data from the spontaneous reporting system. Spontaneous reports from patients and physicians are voluntary; thus, they can be affected by the so-called underreporting that is significant and widespread. In addition, data collected from spontaneous reporting systems could be incomplete and incorrect. For instance, an error in reporting allopurinol treatment interval and/or date of ADR occurrence (both used for the calculation of the TTE) cannot be ruled out. Three main limitations strictly related to our study were the clinical setting, the type of ADRs and the seriousness degree. First, some authors have argued that the therapy with allopurinol is frequently unnecessary based on current guidelines for the treatment of asymptomatic hyperuricemia and gout [79]. Unfortunately, the lack of access to patient’s clinical data and impossibility to verify uricemia precluded from establishing the appropriateness of allopurinol prescription. Second, our study was focused on SCARs, whose diagnosis is complicated by the existence of overlap syndromes, characterized by the coexistence of features from different entities. Third, a reporting bias may have affected the seriousness degree of SCARs; indeed, all SCARs in our study were reported by healthcare professionals and, as we previously said, these reporters seem to be inclined to report serious ADRs.

Notwithstanding these limitations, two main important advantages of surveillance system can be identified: first, it guarantees ongoing surveillance of all patients and medicines and, second, it is relatively inexpensive. In recent years, thanks to the efforts of regulatory agencies, pharmaceutical industry and the medical community, the amount, quality and timely reporting of ADRs have greatly improved increasing the value of spontaneous reporting systems for post-marketing pharmacovigilance purposes.

Conclusion

We analyzed data from the Italian spontaneous reporting system from 2001 to 2019 in order to analyze ICSRs that reported allopurinol as suspected drug, with a focus on those reporting the association allopurinol/serious cutaneous ADRs (including SCARs). Our results demonstrated that ICSRs that reported serious cutaneous ADRs accounted for more than 50% of the total ICSRs related to allopurinol (56 out of a total of 108 ICSRs) but also that those ADRs, especially SCARs, commonly occurred in females and elderly patients (not statistically significant difference), frequently leading to unfavorable outcomes. Furthermore, those conditions frequently resulted in hospitalization and in some cases they led to the patient’s death. Given the negative outcomes of SCARs and considering their high mortality rates, a rapid diagnosis with proper management of these clinical conditions is highly recommended.

Since ADRs still represent a common, often preventable, cause of illness, disability and even death, pharmacovigilance has to be considered as a key component of an effective drug regulation system, clinical practice and public health program in order to reduce harm to patients, improve public health and reduce healthcare costs.

Allopurinol carries a well-known risk of serious cutaneous ADRs.

During almost 20 years of spontaneous reporting activities in Italy, 108 ICSRs that reported allopurinol as suspected were sent to the Campania regional Center of Pharmacovigilance.

Fifty-six cases of serious cutaneous ADRs associated with allopurinol were found. Compared to ICSRs reporting other ADRs, serious cutaneous ADRs had an unfavorable outcome (8% vs. 46%; statistically significant difference).