Literature DB >> 31848507

[Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT and tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, CA24-2) in recurrence and metastasis of postoperative colorectal moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma].

X C Zhang1, J H Zhang1, R F Wang1, Y Fan1, Z L Fu1, P Yan1, G Y Zhao1, Y X Bai1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT and tumor markers (CEA,CA19-9,CA24-2) in detection for recurrence and metastasis of postoperative colorectal moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma.
METHODS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled in this study. All of the patients were tested with serum CEA within 2 weeks when they underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT scan, and some patients were tested with serum CA19-9 and CA24-2 simultaneously. According to the pathology and clinical results of their follow-up, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and tumor markers were calculated based on different divided groups, respectively.
RESULTS: According to the pathology and the results of their clinical follow-up, the sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET/CT, CEA, CA19-9, CA24-2 and the combination of those three tumor markers were 95.74%, 68.09%, 28.57%, 40.00% and 74.47%, respectively. The specificity of 18F-FDG PET/CT, CEA, CA19-9, CA24-2 and the combination of those three tumor markers were 75.00%, 50.00%, 66.67%, 71.43% and 50.00%, respectively. The positive predictive valueof 18F-FDG PET/CT, CEA, CA19-9, CA24-2 and the combination of those three tumor markers were 95.74%, 88.89%, 85.71%, 88.89% and 89.74%, respectively. The negative predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT, CEA, CA19-9, CA24-2 and the combination of those three tumor markers were 75.00%, 26.67%, 11.42%, 17.24%, 25.00%, respectively. The accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT, CEA, CA19-9, CA24-2 and the combination of those three tumor markers were 92.73%, 65.47%, 32.65%, 44.68% and 70.91%, respectively. There were 2 cases of false positive and 2 cases of false negative in 18F-FDG PET/CT.
CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET/CT has high value in detecting recurrence and metastasis of postoperative colorectal carcinoma. Tumor markers have the positive value to imply the recurrence and metastasis of postoperative colorectal carcinoma and are useful to indicate when to perform the 18F-FDG PET/CT. The combination of tumor markers could improve the diagnostic efficiency to some extent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31848507      PMCID: PMC7433597     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  7 in total

1.  Dramatically enhanced solid-state electrochemiluminescence of CdTe quantum dots composed with TiO2 nanoparticles.

Authors:  Shou-Nian Ding; Bu-Hong Gao; Dan Shan; Yue-Ming Sun; Serge Cosnier
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 5.236

2.  Co-culture of arbuscular mycorrhiza-like fungi (Piriformospora indica and Sebacina vermifera) with plant cells of Linum album for enhanced production of podophyllotoxins: a first report.

Authors:  Ashish Baldi; Abhishek Jain; Nishant Gupta; A K Srivastava; V S Bisaria
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.461

3.  Memory and other properties of multiple test procedures generated by entangled graphs.

Authors:  Willi Maurer; Frank Bretz
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Evidence-based guideline recommendations on the use of positron emission tomography imaging in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  K Chan; S Welch; C Walker-Dilks; A Raifu
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.126

5.  ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. a personalized approach to clinical decision making.

Authors:  H J Schmoll; E Van Cutsem; A Stein; V Valentini; B Glimelius; K Haustermans; B Nordlinger; C J van de Velde; J Balmana; J Regula; I D Nagtegaal; R G Beets-Tan; D Arnold; F Ciardiello; P Hoff; D Kerr; C H Köhne; R Labianca; T Price; W Scheithauer; A Sobrero; J Tabernero; D Aderka; S Barroso; G Bodoky; J Y Douillard; H El Ghazaly; J Gallardo; A Garin; R Glynne-Jones; K Jordan; A Meshcheryakov; D Papamichail; P Pfeiffer; I Souglakos; S Turhal; A Cervantes
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Carcinoembryonic antigen screening: how far should we go?

Authors:  Y K Lim; M H Kam; K W Eu
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.858

7.  ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  E Van Cutsem; A Cervantes; R Adam; A Sobrero; J H Van Krieken; D Aderka; E Aranda Aguilar; A Bardelli; A Benson; G Bodoky; F Ciardiello; A D'Hoore; E Diaz-Rubio; J-Y Douillard; M Ducreux; A Falcone; A Grothey; T Gruenberger; K Haustermans; V Heinemann; P Hoff; C-H Köhne; R Labianca; P Laurent-Puig; B Ma; T Maughan; K Muro; N Normanno; P Österlund; W J G Oyen; D Papamichael; G Pentheroudakis; P Pfeiffer; T J Price; C Punt; J Ricke; A Roth; R Salazar; W Scheithauer; H J Schmoll; J Tabernero; J Taïeb; S Tejpar; H Wasan; T Yoshino; A Zaanan; D Arnold
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 32.976

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.