| Literature DB >> 31847878 |
Wenyuan Guo1, Miaomiao Zhou1, Jiewen Qiu1, Yuwan Lin1, Xiang Chen1, Shuxuan Huang1, Mingshu Mo1, Hanqun Liu1, Guoyou Peng1, Xiaoqin Zhu2, Pingyi Xu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests that α-synuclein (α-syn) aggregation and intercellular transmission contributes to pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease (PD) and the toxic fibrillary α-syn binds lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG3) receptor that mediates α-syn transmission. The deletion of LAG3 in animal models was shown to limit α-syn spreading and alleviate the pathological changes of dopaminergic neurons and animal behavioral deficits induced by α-syn aggregation. However, little is known about the genetic association of LAG3 variation with human PD development.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarker; LAG3; Parkinson disease; Transmission; α-Synuclein
Year: 2019 PMID: 31847878 PMCID: PMC6918662 DOI: 10.1186/s12974-019-1654-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroinflammation ISSN: 1742-2094 Impact factor: 8.322
The demographic characterization of PD patients and controls
| Samples | Demographics | Control | PD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNA | Number | 536 | 646 | |
| Gender (male/female) | 341/195 | 387/259 | 0.191b | |
| Age years (mean ± SD) | 63.73 ± 10.08 | 63.40 ± 12.67 | 0.622a | |
| CSF | Number | 21 | 58 | |
| Sex (male/female) | 12/9 | 31/27 | 0.80b | |
| Age, years(mean ± SD) | 53.90 ± 19.27 | 56.86 ± 9.43 | 0.36a | |
| H&Y score | 2.01(1–3) | |||
| Disease duration | 3.25(0.5–11) |
PD Parkinson’s disease, SD standard deviation, H&Y Hoehn & Yahr
ap Value obtained by t test, bp Value obtained by χ2 test.
ap value obtained by t test
bp value obtained by χ2 test
The analysis of genotype and allele distribution on PD cases and controls
| SNP | Models | PD | Control | OR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs951818 | Dominant ((CC + CA)/AA) | 552/77 | 460/72 | 1.122 (0.795–1.583) | 0.570 |
| Recessive (CC/(CA + AA)) | 282/347 | 213/319 | 1.217 (0.963–1.538) | 0.113 | |
| Allele (C/A) | 834/424 | 673/391 | 1.143 (0.963–1.356) | 0.137 | |
| Female | Dominant ((CC + CA)/AA) | 218/33 | 154/40 | 1.716 (1.036–2.843) | 0.048 |
| Recessive (CC/(CA + AA)) | 118/133 | 59/135 | 2.030 (1.369–3.010) | 0.001 | |
| Allele (C/A) | 336/166 | 213/175 | 1.663 (1.266–2.185) | 0.000 | |
| Male | Dominant ((CC + CA)/AA) | 334/44 | 306/32 | 0.794 (0.491–1.284) | 0.412 |
| Recessive (CC/(CA + AA)) | 164/214 | 154/184 | 0.916 (0.682–1.230) | 0.610 | |
| Allele (C/A) | 498/258 | 460/216 | 0.906 (0.727–1.130) | 0.414 | |
| rs1922452 | Dominant ((AA+AG)/GG) | 555/79 | 466/59 | 0.889 (0.621–1.274) | 0.583 |
| Recessive (AA/(AG + GG)) | 282/352 | 208/317 | 0.945 (0.703–1.271) | 0.108 | |
| Allele (A/G) | 837/431 | 674/376 | 1.083 (0.913–1.286) | 0.384 | |
| Female | Dominant ((AA+AG)/GG) | 222/34 | 165/25 | 0.989 (0.568–1.722) | 1 |
| Recessive (AA/(AG + GG)) | 118/138 | 58/132 | 1.975 (1.311–2.888) | 0.001 | |
| Allele (A/G) | 340/172 | 223/157 | 1.392 (1.058–1.831) | 0.022 | |
| Male | Dominant ((AA+AG)/GG) | 333/45 | 301/34 | 0.836 (0.521–1.340) | 0.531 |
| Recessive (AA/(AG + GG)) | 164/214 | 150/185 | 1.221 (0.965–1.544) | 0.766 | |
| Allele (A/G) | 497/259 | 451/219 | 0.932 (0.747–1.162) | 0.568 | |
| rs870849 | Dominant ((CC + CT)/TT) | 615/16 | 513/11 | 0.824 (0.379–1.792) | 0.698 |
| Recessive (CC/(CT + TT)) | 441/189 | 373/151 | 0.945 (0.732–1.218) | 0.708 | |
| Allele (C/T) | 1056/205 | 886/162 | 0.942 (0.752–1.179) | 0.641 | |
| Female | Dominant ((CC + CT)/TT) | 246/4 | 184/5 | 1.671 (0.443–6.310) | 0.508 |
| Recessive (CC/(CT + TT)) | 186/64 | 136/53 | 1.133 (0.740–1.734) | 0.643 | |
| Allele (C/T) | 432/68 | 320/58 | 1.151 (0.788–1.682) | 0.527 | |
| Male | Dominant ((CC + CT)/TT) | 369/12 | 329/6 | 0.561 (0.208–1.511) | 0.339 |
| Recessive (CC/(CT + TT)) | 255/125 | 237/98 | 0.844 (0.614–1.160) | 0.333 | |
| Allele (C/T) | 624/137 | 566/104 | 0.837 (0.633–1.106) | 0.229 |
PD Parkinson’s disease, OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval. p value obtained by continuity corrected χ2 test. The genotype of rs19922452-AA and rs951818-CC was found to be significantly higher in female PD patients than in controls, respectively (rs951818, OR = 2.03, p = 0.001; rs19922452, OR = 1.975, p = 0.001)
Fig. 1Linkage disequilibrium (|D′|) between pairs of SNPs in LAG3. Between two of the SNPs, the measure of D′ was shown graphically according to color, where deep color represents high D′. rs1922452 and rs951818 were found to be in LD with each other, |D′| = 0.97,which the D′ value was shown in square
Fig. 2sLAG3 and α-synuclein levels in CSF. a sLAG3 levels of CSF in control subjects (88.49 ± 62.96 pg/ml, N = 21) and PD patients (51.56 ± 15.05 pg/ml, N = 58) by MSD-ECL examination. Data represented as mean ± SD, p < 0.0001. b α-synuclein concentration in CSF of controls (2476 ± 4403 pg/ml, N = 21) and PD patients (939.9 ± 2900 pg/ml, N = 58) by MSD-ECL measurement. Data represented as mean ± SD, p < 0.0001.
Fig. 3The analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves on sLAG3 of CSF from PD patients. ROC curves were made by the Youden’s index using the maximum of sensitivity + specificity – 1. AUC = area under the curve. sLAG3 could be a potential biomarker for PD prediction
Fig. 4The correlation analysis of α-synuclein and sLAG3 in CSFs from patients and controls. The levels of sLAG3 in CSF was positively correlated with the concentration of α-synuclein in controls (r = 0.597, p = 0.0042)