| Literature DB >> 31847833 |
Konstantinos Azis1, Ioanna Zerva1, Paraschos Melidis1, Carlos Caceres2, Kostas Bourtzis2, Spyridon Ntougias3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Enterobacter sp. AA26 was recently isolated from the midgut of Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) and it was shown to have positive effects in rearing efficiency when used as larval probiotics. In this study, biomass production was carried out in bench-scale bioreactors to elucidate the biokinetic properties of Enterobacter sp. AA26 and its nutritional value.Entities:
Keywords: Agricultural wastes; Biomass valorization; Insect mass rearing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31847833 PMCID: PMC6918548 DOI: 10.1186/s12896-019-0584-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biotechnol ISSN: 1472-6750 Impact factor: 2.563
Fig. 1Schematic layout of the unit used for oxygen uptake rate (OUR) measurements
Biochemical profile of Enterobacter sp. AA26 using EnteroPluri diagnostic kit
| Biochemical reactions | |
|---|---|
| Glucose fermentation/gas production in anaerobiosis | positive/positive |
| Lysine decarboxylation in anaerobiosis | negative (slightly green) |
| Ornithine decarboxylation in anaerobiosis | positive |
| Hydrogen sulphide production/indole test | negative/negative |
| Adonitol fermentation | positive |
| Lactose fermentation | positive |
| Arabinose fermentation | negative |
| Sorbitol fermentation | positive |
| Acetoin production (Voges-Proskauer) | positive |
| Dulcitol fermentation/phenylalanine deamination | negative/negative |
| Urea hydrolysis | positive |
| Citrate utilization | positive |
Fig. 2Growth curves of Enterobacter sp. AA26 during cultivation in LB broth (left) and CWW (right) (n = 3)
Oxygen uptake rate (OUR) and specific oxygen uptake rate (SOUR) of Enterobacter sp. AA26 cells. The food to microorganism ratio was set at 0.2 g substrate g−1 VSS d− 1 immediately after interrupting the aeration
| Replicates | OUR (mg O2 L− 1 h− 1) | SOUR (mg O2 g− 1 VSS h− 1) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acetate | 1 | 78.5 | 62.3 |
| 2 | 82.7 | 65.6 | |
| 3 | 77.5 | 61.5 | |
| Mean ± SE | 79.6 ± 1.59 | 63.2 ± 1.26 | |
| Glucose | 1 | 69.6 | 118 |
| 2 | 83.9 | 142 | |
| 3 | 60.7 | 103 | |
| Mean ± SE | 71.4 ± 6.76 | 121 ± 1.73 |
Fig. 3Profiles of oxygen uptake rate (a and c, for acetate and glucose, respectively) and cumulative O2 consumption (b and d, for acetate and glucose respectively) in Enterobacter sp. AA26
Determination of yield coefficient (YH) of Enterobacter sp. AA26
| Replicates | YH (g biomass produced/g substrate consumed) | |
|---|---|---|
| Acetate | 1 | 0.59 |
| 2 | 0.68 | |
| 3 | 0.60 | |
| Mean ± SE | 0.62 ± 0.03 | |
| Glucose | 1 | 0.67 |
| 2 | 0.66 | |
| 3 | 0.67 | |
| Mean ± SE | 0.67 ± 0.003 |
Fig. 4Amino acid composition of Enterobacter sp. AA26 and Torula yeast
Fig. 5Vitamin composition of Enterobacter sp. AA26 and Torula yeast. Vitamins B12, C, D3, K1 and K3 in strain AA26 and vitamins B1, B7, B9, B12, C and K3 in Torula yeast were below the detection limit. The detection limits of vitamins B1, B7, B9, B12, C, D3, K1 and K3 were 0.013, 0.01, 0.023, 0.1, 7, 0.01, 0.02 and 0.01 mg/Kg, respectively. Vitamin contents were compared by Student’s t-test, apart from the vitamins B7 and B9, which were marginally above the detection limit in the case of AA26 cells
Fig. 6Intracellular (a) and extracellular (b) hydrolytic activities of Enterobacter sp. AA26 cultivated in commercial available yeast-based medium and cheese whey wastewater