Literature DB >> 31847750

Nationwide Trends in Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in the Post-CREST Era.

Tyler S Cole1, Andrew W Mezher1, Joshua S Catapano1, Jakub Godzik1, Jacob F Baranoski1, Peter Nakaji1, Felipe C Albuquerque1, Michael T Lawton1, Andrew S Little1, Andrew F Ducruet1.   

Abstract

Background and Purpose- The CREST (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial) demonstrated equivalent composite outcomes between carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) for treating carotid stenosis. We investigated nationwide trends in these procedures and associated periprocedural stroke, myocardial infarction, death, cost, and readmission rates since CREST outcomes were published. Methods- We queried the Nationwide Readmissions Database to identify patients undergoing CEA and CAS for asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis from 2010 to 2015. Patients were matched based on demographics, comorbidities, and severity of illness. Results- In total, 378 354 CEA and 57 273 CAS patients were treated during this 6-year period. CEA volume decreased by an average of 2669 procedures annually (P=0.001) with stable CAS volume (P=0.225). After matching, CEA patients had a higher rate of periprocedural stroke than CAS patients, driven by increased stroke risk in symptomatic CEA patients (8.1% versus 5.6%; odds ratio, 1.47 [CI, 1.29-1.68]; P<0.001) but a lower rate of overall inpatient mortality (0.8% versus 1.4%; odds ratio, 0.57 [CI, 0.48-0.68]; P<0.001). CEA patients were less likely to be readmitted within 30 days (7.2% versus 8.0%; odds ratio, 0.90 [CI, 0.84-0.96]; P=0.018) and 90 days (12.3% versus 14.1%; odds ratio, 0.86 [CI, 0.81-0.90]; P<0.001), and mean hospital costs were lower for CEA compared with CAS ($14 433 versus $19 172; P<0.001). Conclusions- The procedural treatment of carotid stenosis has changed dramatically in the post-CREST era. When matched for characteristics and illness severity, patients undergoing CEA had a higher rate of perioperative stroke than patients undergoing CAS, primarily among symptomatic patients. These findings are in contrast to the findings of CREST, which showed nearly twice the risk of stroke in CAS patients compared with CEA patients. CEA was associated with lower procedure cost and readmission rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endarterectomy, carotid; hospital costs; humans; inpatients; stents

Year:  2019        PMID: 31847750     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  5 in total

1.  Antithrombotic Treatment after Carotid Stenting in Patients with Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  B Pardo-Galiana; M Medina-Rodriguez; M Millan-Vazquez; J A Cabezas-Rodriguez; L Lebrato-Hernandez; L Ainz-Gomez; E Zapata-Arriaza; J Ortega; A de Albóniga-Chindurza; J Montaner; A Gonzalez; F Moniche
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Second asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST-2): a randomised comparison of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Alison Halliday; Richard Bulbulia; Leo H Bonati; Johanna Chester; Andrea Cradduck-Bamford; Richard Peto; Hongchao Pan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-08-29       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Accurate classification of carotid endarterectomy indication using physician claims and hospital discharge data.

Authors:  Stephen van Gaal; Arshia Alimohammadi; Amy Y X Yu; Mohammad Ehsanul Karim; Wei Zhang; Jason M Sutherland
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Estimated Cost of Transcarotid Arterial Revascularization Compared With Carotid Endarterectomy and Transfemoral Carotid Stenting.

Authors:  John J Kanitra; Isabella A Graham; Richard D Hayward; Darla K Granger; Richard A Berg; Jimmy C Haouilou
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-27

5.  Use of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization, Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting, and Carotid Endarterectomy in the US From 2015 to 2019.

Authors:  David P Stonko; Earl Goldsborough; Pavel Kibrik; George Zhang; Courtenay M Holscher; Caitlin W Hicks
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-09-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.