| Literature DB >> 31847682 |
Meng Chen1, Qiuting Fu1, Xu Song1, Abaidullah Muhammad1, Renyong Jia2, Yuanfeng Zou1, Lizi Yin1, Lixia Li1, Changliang He1, Gang Ye1, Cheng Lv1, Xiaoxia Liang1, Juan Huang2, Min Cui2, Zhongqiong Yin1.
Abstract
Context: Resveratrol is a natural polyphenol compound. It exhibits antitumor, immunostimulatory, and antiviral activities. However, poor water solubility and structural instability limit its administration and storage.Objective: A resveratrol dry suspension (RDS) was prepared and immunomodulatory effect in immunosuppressive mice induced by cyclophosphamide and anti-inflammatory activities in mice were evaluated.Materials and methods: The preparation of RDS was optimized by the orthogonal design method. To evaluate the immunomodulatory effects, SPF Kunming mice were divided into seven groups comprising of nine males and nine females for each group. The RDS supplemented group was administrated doses of 3.33, 1.67, and 0.83 g/kg/d. Then visceral index, lymphocyte proliferation, the ratio of CD3+ CD4+/CD3+ CD8+, and the contents of cytokines in serum were tested. To ameliorate effects of acetic acid induced capillary permeability, xylene-based ear oedema, and cotton pellet granuloma, RDS as anti-inflammatory agent was administered at doses of 1, 0.33, and 0.1 g/kg/d as compared to indomethacin (IM) provided as a positive control at 10 mg/kg.Entities:
Keywords: Orthogonal design; granuloma; quality assessment; splenic lymphocytes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31847682 PMCID: PMC6968662 DOI: 10.1080/13880209.2019.1699123
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharm Biol ISSN: 1388-0209 Impact factor: 3.503
Selection and evaluation of excipient.
| Species of excipient | Sedimentation volume |
|---|---|
| PVP (0.5%) | 0.67 |
| Xanthan gum (0.5%) | 0.91 |
| HPMC (0.5%) | 0.8 |
| HPMC (0.25%) + PVP (0.25%) | 0.75 |
| Xanthan gum (0.25%) + PVP (0.25%) | 0.88 |
| HPMC (0.25%) + xanthan gum (0.25%) | 0.93 |
The orthogonal experiment table L 9(3̂4).
| Order number | Factor levels | Result | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A (HPMC%) | B (Xanthan gum%) | C (Poloxamer-188%) | D (Blank) | Sedimentation volume | |
| 1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.07 | |
| 2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | |
| 3 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.94 | |
| 4 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.07 | |
| 5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.27 | |
| 6 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.93 | |
| 7 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.07 | |
| 8 | 1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | |
| 9 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.95 | |
| K1 | 0.403 | 0.07 | 0.4 | 0.43 | |
| K2 | 0.423 | 0.223 | 0.407 | 0.4 | |
| K3 | 0.407 | 0.94 | 0.427 | 0.403 | |
| R | 0.02 | 0.87 | 0.027 | 0.03 | |
The main influence factors on the stability of RDS.
| Temperature 60 °C | Humidity 25 °C, RH90 ± 5% | Light intensity 4500 ± 500LX | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 d | 5 d | 10 d | 0 d | 5 d | 10 d | 0 d | 5 d | 10 d | |
| RDS | 2.93% | 2.89% | 2.88% | 2.93% | 2.91% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.91% | 2.89% |
The stability study after the preparations was added to the water.
| 3 h | 1 d | 2 d | 3 d | 5 d | 7 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sedimentation volume | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| Redispersion | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Content | 2.93% | 2.93% | 2.92% | 2.91% | 2.91% | 2.91% |
Determination of visceral index.
| Group | Thymus index (mg/g) | Spleen index (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|
| Model (CY 60 mg/kg) | 2.39 ± 0.66 | 3.05 ± 0.70 |
| Normal | 2.42 ± 0.64 | 4.59 ± 2.09 |
| L (CY 60 mg/kg + RDS 833 mg/kg) | 2.66 ± 0.99 | 5.71 ± 1.30** |
| M (CY 60 mg/kg + RDS 1667 mg/kg) | 2.74 ± 0.70 | 6.81 ± 1.58** |
| H (CY 60 mg/kg + RDS 3333 mg/kg) | 3.2 ± 1.73 | 6.39 ± 1.89** |
| Positive I (CY 60 mg/kg + APS 50 mg/kg) | 2.70 ± 0.68 | 5.99 ± 0.99** |
| Positive II (CY 60 mg/kg + EP 150 mg/kg) | 2.55 ± 1.23 | 5.00 ± 0.62 |
Data are represented as means ± SD; n = 12; comparison was made with the model group; one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan test. The symbols represent statistical significance at **p < 0.01.
T lymphocyte subsets assay.
| Group | CD3+ (%) | CD4+ (%) | CD8+ (%) | CD4+/CD8+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model (CY 60 mg/kg) | 55.82 ± 0.12 | 32.39 ± 0.56 | 25.18 ± 0.48 | 1.3 ± 0.05 |
| Normal | 65.55 ± 1.44 | 50.8 ± 1.56* | 14.93 ± 0.74* | 3.5 ± 0.21** |
| L (CY 60 mg/kg + RDS 833 mg/kg) | 52.67 ± 4.68 | 38.8 ± 3.72 | 15.17 ± 0.88* | 2.49 ± 0.15 |
| M (CY 60 mg/kg + RDS 1667 mg/kg) | 56.87 ± 0.44 | 38.53 ± 1.99 | 21.03 ± 1.61 | 2.12 ± 0.30 |
| H (CY 60 mg/kg + RDS 3333 mg/kg) | 46.13 ± 1.69 | 30.11 ± 1.00 | 15.51 ± 0.61* | 1.95 ± 0.02 |
| Positive I (CY 60 mg/kg + APS 50 mg/kg) | 46.42 ± 2.29 | 31.73 ± 1.57 | 15.37 ± 1.17* | 2.16 ± 0.12 |
| Positive II (CY 60 mg/kg + EP 150 mg/kg) | 55.8 ± 2.82 | 41.87 ± 1.38 | 20.63 ± 1.93 | 2.18 ± 0.14 |
| Pooled SD | 12.29 | 9.80 | 6.01 | 0.86 |
Data are represented as means ± SEM; n = 6; comparison was made with the Model group; one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan test. The symbols represent statistical significance at *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 1.Concentrations of serum cytokines. (A) Concentration of IL-2; (B) Concentration of IFN-γ. Symbols are represented as means ± SD; n = 6; comparison was made with the model group; one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan test. The symbols represent statistical significance at *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 2.Splenic lymphocyte proliferation. (A) Splenic lymphocyte proliferation stimulated by ConA; (B) Splenic lymphocyte proliferation stimulated by LPS. Symbols are represented as means ± SD; n = 6; comparison was made with the model group; one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan test. The symbols represent statistical significance at *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 3.The anti-inflammatory activity of resveratrol dry suspension. (A) Coeliac capillary permeability induced by acetic acid; (B) ear swelling induced by xylene; (C) the weight of cotton pellet granuloma. Symbols are represented as means ± SD; n = 8; comparison was made with the normal group; one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan test. The symbols represent statistical significance at *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.