Literature DB >> 31847586

Renal Thermal Ablation Trends of American Urologists.

Wei Phin Tan1, Ariel A Schulman2, Gregory J Barton1, Christina Sze1, Thomas J Polascik1.   

Abstract

Objective: To define current trends in the utilization of renal thermal ablation by urologists in the United States. Material and
Methods: A six-month case log data for renal procedures submitted by certifying and recertifying American urologists from 2003 to 2018 were obtained from the American Board of Urology and stratified by current procedural terminology code. The utilization of thermal ablative techniques was examined with respect to overall trends, surgeon, and practice characteristics associated with its use.
Results: Six thousand two hundred eleven unique urologists performed 54,075 renal procedures, including 1916 (3.5%) thermal ablations, 630 (1.2%) renal biopsies, 17,361 (32.1%) partial nephrectomies, 20,403 (37.8%) radical nephrectomies, and 7957 (14.7%) nephroureterectomies. Eight hundred twenty-five (13.3%) unique urologists performed renal ablations, including 1344 (70.2%), 418 (21.8%), and 154 (8.0%) laparoscopic, percutaneous, and open ablation procedures, respectively. The annual volume of ablation was highest in 2008, followed by 2010 and 2009. On multivariate modeling of those performing renal interventions, the first decade of practice, self-declared endourologist, urologist who completed an endourology fellowship, urologist who practices in the Mid Atlantic, North Central, South Central, and South Eastern United States (compared with New England) were more likely to perform thermal ablation for renal masses. Urologists who perform renal biopsies and partial nephrectomies are also more likely to perform ablation of renal masses. Conclusions: Thermal ablation accounted for a small percentage of renal interventions performed by urologists in the last 1.5 decades with definable associations to practice characteristics. Renal ablation was most commonly performed laparoscopically, with declining use in recent years.

Keywords:  kidney neoplasm; nephrectomy; renal mass; renal thermal ablation trends

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31847586      PMCID: PMC7194313          DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  11 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 2018.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  William C Huang; Andrew S Levey; Angel M Serio; Mark Snyder; Andrew J Vickers; Ganesh V Raj; Peter T Scardino; Paul Russo
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  The Impact of Surgeon Volume on Perioperative Outcomes and Cost for Patients Receiving Robotic Partial Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Yash S Khandwala; In Gab Jeong; Jae Heon Kim; Deok Hyun Han; Shufeng Li; Ye Wang; Steven L Chang; Benjamin I Chung
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Comparison of outcomes after minimally invasive versus open partial nephrectomy with respect to trainee involvement utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Sean Quigley Kern; Michael B Lustik; Leah P McMann; Gregory P Thibault; Joseph R Sterbis
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 5.  Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ji Eun Choi; Ji Hye You; Dae Keun Kim; Koon Ho Rha; Seon Heui Lee
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Mortality, morbidity and healthcare expenditures after local tumour ablation or partial nephrectomy for T1A kidney cancer.

Authors:  A Larcher; M Sun; P Dell'Oglio; V Trudeau; K Boehm; J Schiffmann; Z Tian; N Fossati; U Capitanio; A Briganti; F Montorsi; P Karakiewicz
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 4.424

7.  Renal cell cancer stage migration: analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Christopher J Kane; Katherine Mallin; Jamie Ritchey; Matthew R Cooperberg; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors--is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes?

Authors:  William C Huang; Elena B Elkin; Andrew S Levey; Thomas L Jang; Paul Russo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Comparison of percutaneous and surgical approaches to renal tumor ablation: metaanalysis of effectiveness and complication rates.

Authors:  Gladwin C Hui; Kemal Tuncali; Servet Tatli; Paul R Morrison; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 10.  Laparoscopic cryoablation vs. percutaneous cryoablation for treatment of small renal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kehua Jiang; Kun Tang; Xiaolin Guo; Haoran Liu; Hongbo Chen; Zhiqiang Chen; Hua Xu; Zhangqun Ye
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.