| Literature DB >> 31847388 |
Balázs Nagy1, István Bakos2, Erik Geissler3, Krisztina László1.
Abstract
The potential applications of mesoporous carbon aerogels are wide-ranging. These gels are often obtained from resorcinol-formaldehyde (RF) hydrogel precursors. The sol-gel method in this synthesis provides an efficient and versatile means of product control through systematic variation of process conditions, such as pH, stoichiometry, concentration, catalyst, further additives, etc., in addition to the drying and pyrolytic conditions. Here, a novel means of tuning the texture of carbon aerogels is proposed. Water-1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium ethyl sulfate ([emim][EtSO4] mixtures constitutes a polycondensation medium that requires no added catalyst, thus yielding an intrinsically metal-free carbon aerogel after pyrolysis. We also show that the carbon morphology is tailored by the supramolecular structure of the aqueous ionic liquid. The results of scanning electron micrographs, low-temperature nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms, and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) confirm that changing the initial water concentration from 9 to 55 wt % gives rise to systematic alteration of the mesopore size and volume, as well as of the bead size. The pore structure becomes consolidated only when the water content exceeds 25 wt %. When the water content reaches 55 wt %, the bead size increases by two orders of magnitude. The electrocatalytic performance, however, is compromised, most probably by structural defects.Entities:
Keywords: RTIL; SAXS; SEM; nitrogen adsorption isotherms; pore size distribution; sol-gel reaction
Year: 2019 PMID: 31847388 PMCID: PMC6947451 DOI: 10.3390/ma12244208
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
List of prepared carbon aerogel samples.
| Sample | Initial Water Content of the Solvent (wt %) |
|---|---|
| C9 * | 9.1 |
| C15 | 15.4 |
| C20 | 19.7 |
| C25 | 25.2 |
| C31 | 30.9 |
| C37 | 36.7 |
| C43 | 42.6 |
| C49 | 48.7 |
| C55 | 55 |
| C100cat | 100 ** |
* added with the aq. formaldehyde; ** with Na2CO3 catalyst.
Figure 1SEM images of selected carbon aerogels. (a) C100cat; (b) C9; (c) C31; (d) C43; (e,f) C55. The scale bar is 500 nm for a–d, 2 μm for e, and 50 μm for f. The average size of the spherical beads is listed in Table 2.
Characterization of morphology. Data from SEM, gas adsorption, and SAXS analysis *.
| Sample |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nm | m2/g | cm3/g | cm3/g | cm3/g | cm3/g | m2/g | nm | ||
| C9 | 12 ± 2 | 199 | 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 1064 ± 50 | 8.7 | 5.25 | |
| C15 | – | 267 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.063 | – | – | |
| C20 | – | 469 | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.053 | – | – | |
| C25 | – | 590 | 0.44 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.063 | – | – | |
| C31 | 14 ± 2 | 713 | 0.68 | 0.28 | 0.40 | 1417 ± 30 | 7.3 | 1.99 | |
| C37 | – | 697 | 0.81 | 0.27 | 0.54 | 0.069 | – | – | |
| C43 | 20 ± 3 | 644 | 1.1 | 0.25 | 0.85 | – | 1494 ± 30 | 16.8 | 2.32 |
| C49 | – | 766 | 0.85 | 0.27 | 0.58 | 0.079 | – | – | |
| C55 | 1977 ± 238 | 677 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.10 | 0.089 | 787 ± 80 | n.a. j | 1.16 |
| C100cat | 20 ± 4 | 865 | 1.7 | 0.35 | 1.35 |
* SEM: scanning electron microscopy; SAXS: small angle X-ray scattering; a diameter of the spherical beads from SEM (from 100 data); b apparent surface area from BET model, the estimated error is 5%; c total pore volume from N2 adsorption; d micropore volume from N2 adsorption; e mesopore volume, Vmeso (= Vtot − Vmicro); f ultramicropore volume from CO2 adsorption; g,h surface area and radius of gyration of the elementary building units from SAXS; j out of the range of the measurement. Note that since RSAXS is estimated from the region of maximum curvature in the low q SAXS response (Figure 4) (i.e., where qRG > 1), the error in the values can be as large as 20%. The estimated error in SSAXS, which stems principally from the extrapolation to q = 0 in the calculation of the Porod invariant Q (Equation (2)), is of the order of 5%, except in sample C55, where the uncertainty could be as high as ca. 10%.
Figure 2Low-temperature nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms of carbon aerogels synthesized in [emim][EtSO4]/water medium. For comparison, the isotherm of C100cat is also included. For clarity, isotherms are plotted in two separate diagrams.
Figure 3Pore size distribution derived from the nitrogen adsorption data calculated with the Quenched Solid State Density Functional Theory (QSDFT) model (slit geometry).
Figure 4SAXS response of selected carbon aerogels prepared in various [emim][EtSO4]/water media.
Figure 5Water vapor isotherms of selected carbon aerogels at 20 °C.
Figure 6Cyclic voltammograms of samples C9 and C49 measured in Ar-purged 0.5 M H2SO4 at scan rate 50 mV/s (a). Carbon aerogel from [17] is plotted for comparison. (b) Linear sweep voltammograms of C49 measured in O2 saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 at scan rate 10 mV/s.