| Literature DB >> 31847295 |
Florinda Fratianni1, Autilia Cozzolino2, Vincenzo De Feo3, Raffaele Coppola2, Maria Neve Ombra1, Filomena Nazzaro1.
Abstract
The aim of this paper was to study the polyphenols of peel and pulp of three Citrus taxa-Citrus medica, Citrus bergamia, and Citrus medica cv. Salò-cultivated in the Cosenza province, Southern Italy, and to evaluate their antioxidant and antibacterial activity, performed against Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pectobacterium carotovorum. Furthermore, we assessed the inhibitory effect of the extracts on bacterial capacity to form biofilm, and on the metabolic activity of the cells present therein. The results indicated that such extracts could find new potential applications in the field of natural antioxidant and anti-bacterial agents in pharmaceutics, agriculture, and food fields.Entities:
Keywords: Citrus bergamia; Citrus medica; Citrus medica cv. Salò; antibacterial activity; biofilm; polyphenols
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31847295 PMCID: PMC6943604 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24244577
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Total polyphenols and antioxidant activity exhibited by the ethanolic extracts obtained from peel and pulp of bergamot, cedar, and cedar of Salò. Total polyphenols are reported as µg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/gr of fresh product, antioxidant activity was expressed in terms of EC50, representing the effective concentration (mg) capable of inhibiting the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical activity of 50% after a 60-min incubation period.
| Total Polyphenols | Antioxidant Activity | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bergamot | Cedar | Cedar of Salò | Bergamot | Cedar | Cedar of Salò | |
|
| 748.08 ± 43.67 | 291.97 ± 20.81 | 1002.3 ± 54.41 | 6.47 ± 0.48 | 19.40 ± 1.15 | 3.96 ± 0.09 |
|
| 208.02 ± 14.55 | 148.98 ± 14.51 | 242.73 ± 15.17 | 10.99 ± 0.58 | 24.22 ± 1.62 | 10.46 ± 1.03 |
Polyphenol composition of the ethanolic extracts from peel and pulp of bergamot, cedar, and cedar of Salò. The data are reported as average of µg/g of fresh product ± standard deviation. Legend = nd: not detected.
| Bergamot | Cedar | Cedar of Salò | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peel | Pulp | Peel | Pulp | Peel | Pulp | |
|
| ||||||
| Gallic acid | 24.68 ± 1.03 | 54.186 ± 2.34 | 39.02 ± 2.10 | 22.16 ± 1.55 | 33.49 ± 1.37 | 16.84 ± 1.67 |
| Chlorogenic acid | 71.98 ± 1.67 | 28.91 ± 0.57 | nd | nd | 116.39 ± 6.32 | 45.3 ± 2.14 |
| Caffeic acid | nd | nd | nd | nd | 7.11 ± 0.57 | 6.97 ± 0.57 |
| Coumaric acid | nd | nd | nd | nd | 21.05 ± 0.57 | 11.61 ± 0.57 |
| Ferulic acid | 181.58 ± 6.32 | 48.30 ± 1.67 | nd | 113.91 ± 1.67 | 295.97 ± 10.2 | 106.36 ± 6.32 |
|
| ||||||
| Rutin | nd | nd | 115.47 ± 5.42 | 19.39 ± 1.67 | nd | nd |
| Epicatechin | 73.40 ± 1.67 | 26.87 ± 1.67 | nd | 9.85 ± 0.57 | 105.1 ± 1.67 | 44.4 ± 1.67 |
| Quercetin | 97.32 ± 10.2 | nd | nd | nd | 150.89 ± 6.32 | nd |
| Apigenin | nd | nd | nd | nd | 24.26 ± 1.67 | nd |
| Catechin | 20.56 ± 2.14 | 7.03 ± 0.57 | 4.34 ± 0.57 | nd | 68.78 ± 1.37 | 11.84 ± 1.37 |
|
| 278.24 | 131.40 | 39.02 | 136.07 | 474.01 | 187.08 |
|
| 191.28 | 33.9 | 119.81 | 29.24 | 349.03 | 56.24 |
|
| 469.52 | 165.3 | 158.83 | 169.31 | 823.04 | 243.32 |
Minimal inhibitory concentration of the polyphenol extracts from the pulp and peel of bergamot, cedar, and cedar of Salò evaluated through the resazurin test, as reported in the Materials and Methods.
| MIC (mg/mL) | Bergamot | Cedar | Cedar of Salò | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peel | Pulp | Peel | Pulp | Peel | Pulp | |
|
| 9.00 | 8.00 | 10.00 | 9.00 | 9.00 | 8.00 |
|
| 8.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 7.00 |
|
| 8.00 | >10.00 | 9.00 | 9.00 | 9.00 | 10.00 |
|
| 8.00 | >10.00 | 7.00 | 10.00 | 8.00 | 9.00 |
|
| 10.00 | 7.00 | 10.00 | 9.00 | 7.00 | 8.00 |
Figure 1Inhibitory action of the extracts from pulp and peel of bergamot on the bacterial capability to form biofilm (a) and on the metabolic activity of bacterial cells present within the biofilm (b). The test was performed using three sub-minimal inhibitory concentrations of the samples, previously calculated through the resazurin test for each tester pathogenic strain used in the experiments. The data are reported as percentage with respect to the control. Legend: EC: E. coli; LM: L. monocytogenes; PC: P. carotovorum; PS: Ps. aeruginosa; SA: Staph. aureus.
Figure 2Inhibitory action of the extracts from peel and pulp of cedar, on the bacterial capability to form biofilm (a) and on the metabolic activity of bacterial cells present within the biofilm (b). The test was performed using three sub-minimal inhibitory concentrations of the samples, previously calculated through the resazurin test for each tester pathogenic strain used in the experiments. The data are reported as percentage with respect to the control. Legend: EC: E. coli; LM: L. monocytogenes; PC: P. carotovorum; PS: Ps. aeruginosa; SA: Staph. aureus.
Figure 3Inhibitory action of the extracts from peel and pulp of cedar of Salò, on the bacterial capability to form biofilm (a) and on the metabolic activity of bacterial cells present within the biofilm (b). The test was performed using three sub-minimal inhibitory concentrations of the samples, previously calculated through the resazurin test for each tester pathogenic strain used in the experiments. The data are reported as percentage with respect to the control. Legend: EC: E. coli; LM: L. monocytogenes; PC: P. carotovorum; PS: Ps. aeruginosa; SA: Staph. aureus.