| Literature DB >> 31847215 |
Chan-Woo Park1, Won-Jae Youe1,2, Seok-Ju Kim2, Song-Yi Han1, Ji-Soo Park1, Eun-Ah Lee1, Gu-Joong Kwon3, Yong-Sik Kim1, Nam-Hun Kim1, Seung-Hwan Lee1.
Abstract
Kraft lignin (KL) or plasticized KL (PKL)/poly(lactic acid) (PLA) composites, containing different lignin contents and with and without the coupling agent, were prepared in this study using twin-screw extrusion at 180 °C. Furthermore, ε-caprolactone and polymeric diphenylmethane diisocyanate (pMDI) were used as a plasticizer of KL and a coupling agent to improve interfacial adhesion, respectively. It was found that lignin plasticization improved lignin dispersibility in the PLA matrix and increased the melt flow index due to decrease in melt viscosity. The tensile strength of KL or PKL/PLA composites was found to decrease as the content of KL and PKL increased in the absence of pMDI, and increased due to pMDI addition. The existence of KL and PKL in the composites decreased the thermal degradation rate against the temperature and increased char residue. Furthermore, the diffusion coefficient of water in the composites was also found to decrease due to KL or PKL addition.Entities:
Keywords: coupling agent; lignin composite; plasticization; twin-screw extrusion
Year: 2019 PMID: 31847215 PMCID: PMC6960867 DOI: 10.3390/polym11122089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Scanning electron microscope micrograms of the fractured surface of neat poly(lactic acid) PLA, kraft lignin (KL)/PLA and plasticized KL (PKL)/PLA composites containing different content of lignin and polymeric diphenylmethane diisocyanate (pMDI).
Effect of KL or PKL and pMDI addition on melt flow index (MFI) and melt viscosity of KL/PLA and PKL/PLA composites.
| KL or PKL Content (wt.%) | PLA Content | pMDI Content | Melt Flow Index (g/10 min) | Melt Viscosity (kPa·s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KL | PKL | ||||
| - | - | 100 | - | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 59.1 ± 3.7 |
| 10 | - | 90 | - | 6.0 ± 0.6 | 21.4 ± 2.0 |
| 20 | - | 80 | - | 20.9 ± 5.3 | 6.4 ± 1.8 |
| 30 | - | 70 | - | 26.4 ± 5.0 | 5.0 ± 1.0 |
| 30 | - | 70 | 1 | 19.7 ± 4.1 | 6.7 ± 1.6 |
| 30 | - | 70 | 3 | 10.6 ± 0.9 | 12.1 ± 1.0 |
| - | 10 | 90 | - | 66.0 ± 1.7 | 1.9 ± 0.2 |
| - | 20 | 80 | - | 159.7 ± 37.2 | 0.9 ± 0.4 |
| - | 30 | 70 | - | 280.3 ± 31.2 | 0.5 ± 0.2 |
| - | 30 | 70 | 1 | 127.2 ± 21.6 | 1.8 ± 1.2 |
| - | 30 | 70 | 3 | 91.9 ± 29.0 | 2.0 ± 0.9 |
Effect of KL or PKL and pMDI content on tensile strength and elastic modulus of KL or PKL/PLA composites.
| KL or PKL Content (wt.%) | PLA Content | pMDI Content | Tensile Strength | Elastic Modulus | Elongation at Break (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KL | PKL | |||||
| - | - | 100 | - | 41.3 ± 3.1 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.1 |
| 10 | - | 90 | - | 27.0 ± 2.5 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.1 |
| 20 | - | 80 | - | 24.5 ± 1.4 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.1 |
| 30 | - | 70 | - | 21.8 ± 4.0 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.1 |
| 30 | - | 70 | 1 | 23.2 ± 2.5 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.2 |
| 30 | - | 70 | 3 | 25.3 ± 1.5 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.1 |
| - | 10 | 90 | - | 19.2 ± 3.8 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.2 |
| - | 20 | 80 | - | 18.6 ± 1.1 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.1 |
| - | 30 | 70 | - | 16.0 ± 2.5 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.1 |
| - | 30 | 70 | 1 | 19.6 ± 1.9 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 |
| - | 30 | 70 | 3 | 26.2 ± 3.0 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 |
Figure 2FTIR spectra of (a) neat PLA, pMDI, and (b) KL or PKL/PLA (30/70) composites, with and without pMDI.
Figure 3Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) (a) and derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) (b) curves of neat PLA and KL or PKL/PLA composites containing different lignin content, with and without pMDI.
Figure 4Water absorption curves of neat PLA and KL or PKL/PLA composites, with and without pMDI, with increasing immersion time in water.
Figure 5Plots of / versus t1/2 and ln(1−/) versus t for neat PLA and KL or PKL/PLA composites containing different lignin content, with and without pMDI.
Maximum water absorption amount and diffusion coefficient of neat PLA and KL or PKL/PLA composites containing different lignin content, with and without pMDI.
| Samples | Maximum Water Absorption Amount | Diffusion Coefficient | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short-Term | Long-Term | ||||
| D | R2 | D | R2 | ||
|
| 0.78 | 9.2 | 0.999 | 5.0 | 0.977 |
| KL/PLA (10/90) | 1.38 | 3.2 | 0.999 | 1.1 | 0.990 |
| KL/PLA (20/80) | 2.47 | 3.0 | 0.994 | 1.0 | 0.998 |
| KL/PLA (30/70) | 2.66 | 2.2 | 0.989 | 0.6 | 0.983 |
| KL/PLA (30/70) with pMDI | 2.27 | 3.7 | 0.992 | 1.5 | 0.999 |
| PKL/PLA (10/90) | 1.44 | 3.8 | 0.990 | 1.3 | 0.999 |
| PKL/PLA (20/80) | 1.87 | 4.0 | 0.892 | 1.1 | 0.999 |
| PKL/PLA (30/70) | 1.99 | 3.7 | 0.982 | 1.2 | 0.998 |
| PKL/PLA (30/70) with pMDI | 2.04 | 3.3 | 0.997 | 1.1 | 0.998 |