Literature DB >> 31846635

Predictors of Recovery in Patients Supported With Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Massive Pulmonary Embolism.

Mehrdad Ghoreishi1, Laura DiChiacchio2, Chetan Pasrija2, Anahita Ghazi2, Kristopher B Deatrick2, Jean Jeudy3, Bartley P Griffith2, Zachary N Kon4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has emerged as a promising initial support strategy for acute massive pulmonary embolism. However, it remains unclear which patients will ultimately require surgical pulmonary embolectomy (SPE) vs anticoagulation alone.
METHODS: All consecutive patients (2015-2018) with confirmed massive PE, placed on VA-ECMO utilizing a protocolized approach, were reviewed. Per protocol, patients were supported for 3 to 5 days before reevaluation of right ventricular (RV) function via echocardiography. If RV function recovered, VA-ECMO was discontinued with no further intervention (no-SPE group). In patients with persistent RV dysfunction, SPE was performed.
RESULTS: Forty-five patients were identified, and 41 patients were treated per protocol. Seventy-three percent responded to anticoagulation alone, and 27% required SPE. Factors associated with SPE rather than decannulation with anticoagulation alone included prolonged shortness of breath, elevated N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, enlarged pulmonary artery diameter, and history of venous thromboembolism. A predictive algorithm was developed with a negative predictive value of 97% and a specificity of 97% for a low-risk score, and a positive predictive value of 100% and sensitivity of 67% for a high-risk score. Overall, 90-day survival was 97% in the no-SPE group and 100% in the SPE group.
CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, greater than 70% of patients who presented with massive PE and supported with VA-ECMO ultimately recovered with anticoagulation alone. Specific risk factors, likely related to thrombus chronicity, may be associated with lack of RV recovery, and can be utilized for consideration of early surgical intervention to minimize VA-ECMO duration.
Copyright © 2020 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31846635     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.10.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   5.102


  6 in total

Review 1.  The Surgeon's Role in Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Alexandra E Sperry; Matthew Williams; Pavan Atluri; Wilson Y Szeto; Marisa Cevasco; Christian A Bermudez; Michael A Acker; Michael Ibrahim
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2021-05-06

2.  Management of Massive Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Eva Polaková; Josef Veselka
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2022-09-23

3.  Not Alternative, But Additional Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients with Life-Threatening Pulmonary Thromboembolism.

Authors:  So Ree Kim; Seong-Mi Park
Journal:  Int J Heart Fail       Date:  2020-07-17

4.  Clinical and imaging outcomes after intermediate- or high-risk pulmonary embolus.

Authors:  Daniel Lachant; Christina Bach; Bennett Wilson; Vaseem Chengazi; Bruce Goldman; Neil Lachant; Anthony Pietropaoli; Scott Cameron; R James White
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.886

Review 5.  Management of High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: What Is the Place of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation?

Authors:  Benjamin Assouline; Marie Assouline-Reinmann; Raphaël Giraud; David Levy; Ouriel Saura; Karim Bendjelid; Alain Combes; Matthieu Schmidt
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 6.  Role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and surgical embolectomy in acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Marc de Perrot
Journal:  Curr Opin Pulm Med       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.868

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.