Literature DB >> 31846516

No effect of tDCS of the primary motor cortex on isometric exercise performance or perceived fatigue.

James Graeme Wrightson1,2, Rosie Twomey1, Samuel Tin Yan Yeung1, Guillaume Yves Millet1,3.   

Abstract

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the primary motor cortex has been reported to improve isometric exercise performance without changing corticospinal excitability. One possible cause for this may be the previous use of relatively high (2 mA) current intensities, which have inconsistent effects on corticospinal excitability. The present pre-registered study aimed to replicate previously reported ergogenic effects of 2 mA tDCS and examine whether 1 mA anodal tDCS both improved isometric exercise performance and perceived fatigue, and more reliably altered corticospinal excitability. On three separate occasions, participants performed a sustained submaximal isometric knee extension until failure after receiving either 1, 2 mA or sham anodal tDCS. Corticospinal excitability of the knee extensors was measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation immediately before and after tDCS. Rating of fatigue was recorded throughout the isometric exercise. Neither 1 nor 2 mA tDCS improved exercise performance, or reduced perceived fatigue, compared with sham stimulation. There was also no effect of tDCS on the corticospinal excitability of the knee extensors. We found no effect of tDCS on either exercise performance, perceived fatigue or corticospinal excitability. This study adds to the growing body of literature reporting no ergogenic effect of tDCS. Large pre-registered replications of previously reported effects are now required before tDCS can be considered an effective method to improve exercise performance.
© 2019 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain stimulation; exercise tolerance; fatigability; transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31846516     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  4 in total

Review 1.  Central nervous system physiology.

Authors:  John Rothwell; Andrea Antal; David Burke; Antony Carlsen; Dejan Georgiev; Marjan Jahanshahi; Dagmar Sternad; Josep Valls-Solé; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Cutaneous sensation of electrical stimulation waveforms.

Authors:  Gavin Hsu; Forouzan Farahani; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Brain Electrical Activity, Heart Rate Variability, and Dual-Task Performance in Healthy and Fibromyalgia Women: A Study Protocol.

Authors:  Mari Carmen Gomez-Alvaro; Santos Villafaina; Juan Luis Leon-Llamas; Alvaro Murillo-Garcia; María Melo-Alonso; Jesús Sánchez-Gómez; Pablo Molero; Ricardo Cano-Plasencia; Narcis Gusi
Journal:  Behav Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-04

4.  Is the "end-of-study guess" a valid measure of sham blinding during transcranial direct current stimulation?

Authors:  Christopher Turner; Catherine Jackson; Gemma Learmonth
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.386

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.