Literature DB >> 31846368

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for the X and Y Chromosome Centromeres Helps Differentiate Between Gestational and Nongestational Choriocarcinoma in Clinically Ambiguous Cases.

Rumeal D Whaley1, Rachel E Dougherty1, Liang Cheng1, Thomas M Ulbright1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT.—: Gestational choriocarcinoma usually presents during the reproductive years, typically within 1 year of pregnancy, although presentation remote from pregnancy also occurs and may cause confusion with other tumors, including choriocarcinoma of germ cell origin and somatic carcinomas with choriocarcinomatous differentiation. It is important to separate these tumors for treatment and prognostic reasons. OBJECTIVE.—: To assess the utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization for the X and Y chromosome centromeres in determining the gestational origin of clinically ambiguous extrauterine choriocarcinomas in women. DESIGN.—: A review of female patients with extrauterine choriocarcinomas who had no evidence of prior gestational trophoblastic disease was performed. Samples were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization for the X and Y chromosome centromeres using standard methodologies. RESULTS.—: Five cases met the criteria, all of which displayed trophoblastic cells and necrosis. Three cases (60%) had Y chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization, which confirmed gestational origin. Although the 2 cases without a Y chromosome would ordinarily require molecular genotyping for paternal genetic material to establish gestational origin, in one of these cases a subsequent recurrence of yolk sac tumor allowed confirmation of its mediastinal origin. CONCLUSIONS.—: Fluorescence in situ hybridization for detection of the X and Y chromosome centromeres is an effective screening test for gestational choriocarcinoma. It provided a definitive diagnosis of metastatic gestational choriocarcinoma in 3 of 5 potential cases that lacked a clinical history of gestational trophoblastic disease. An additional benefit is that more laboratories have the capability to perform fluorescence in situ hybridization than can perform molecular genotyping for definitive diagnosis.
© 2020 College of American Pathologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31846368     DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0207-OA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  3 in total

Review 1.  Intestinal metastasis from choriocarcinoma: a case series and literature review.

Authors:  Yuting Wang; Zhe Wang; Xiaoxu Zhu; Qihong Wan; Peilin Han; Jun Ying; Jianhua Qian
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.253

Review 2.  Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia with extrauterine metastasis but lacked uterine primary lesions: a single center experience and literature review.

Authors:  Jingnan Li; Yu Wang; Bingjian Lu; Weiguo Lu; Xing Xie; Yuanming Shen
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  Non-Gestational Ovarian Choriocarcinoma: A Rare Ovarian Cancer Subtype.

Authors:  Sean Cronin; Nishat Ahmed; Amaranta D Craig; Stephanie King; Min Huang; Christina S Chu; Gina M Mantia-Smaldone
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.