Literature DB >> 31846029

Nudging Emergency Care Providers to Reduce Opioid Prescribing Using Peer Norm Comparison Feedback: A Pilot Randomized Trial.

Brian Suffoletto1, Aaron Landau2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility, acceptability, and potential impact of using audit and feedback (A&F) with or without peer norm comparison on opioid prescribing by emergency medicine providers.
METHODS: A convenience sample of 37 emergency medicine providers were recruited from 16 emergency departments in Western Pennsylvania for a pilot randomized controlled trial. Participants completed a baseline survey, were randomly allocated to A&F (N = 17) or A&F with peer norm comparison (N = 20), and were asked to complete a postintervention survey. We matched each participant 1:1 to a control who was not exposed to either intervention.
RESULTS: At baseline, 57% of participants perceived that they prescribed opioids at the same frequency as their peers, whereas 32% perceived prescribing less than and 11% perceived prescribing more than their peers. Most participants rated the interventions as helpful, with no differences between conditions. For the A&F with peer norm comparison condition, from pre- to postintervention, there was a relative increase of 20% in the percentage of participants who perceived that they prescribed more opioids than their peers but no change in the A&F condition (P = 0.02). 56.8% of controls, 52.9% of A&F participants, and 75.5% of A&F with peer norm comparison participants reduced their opioid prescribing (P = 0.33). The mean reduction in opioid prescriptions (SD) was 3.3. (9.6) for controls, 3.9 (10.5) for A&F, and 7.3 (7.8) for A&F with peer norm comparison (P = 0.31).
CONCLUSIONS: Audit and feedback interventions with peer norm comparisons are helpful to providers, can alter perceptions about prescribing norms, and are a potentially effective way to alter ED providers' opioid prescribing behavior.
© 2019 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intervention; Opioid Prescribing; Peer Feedback

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31846029     DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  3 in total

1.  Decreased Overall and Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing in a Veterans Affairs Hospital Emergency Department following a Peer Comparison-Based Stewardship Intervention.

Authors:  Deanna J Buehrle; Rameez H Phulpoto; Marilyn M Wagener; Cornelius J Clancy; Brooke K Decker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Applications of Behavioral Economics to Pharmaceutical Policymaking: A Scoping Review with Implications for Best-Value Biological Medicines.

Authors:  Arnold G Vulto; Isabelle Huys; Yannick Vandenplas; Steven Simoens; Florian Turk
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Systematic review of clinician-directed nudges in healthcare contexts.

Authors:  Briana S Last; Alison M Buttenheim; Carter E Timon; Nandita Mitra; Rinad S Beidas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.