Hyebin Wang 1 , Aryung Nam 2 , Kunho Song 1 , Hwa Young Youn 2 , Kyoung Won Seo 1 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which rapid thromboelastography (r-TEG) could decrease the testing time in comparison with that required for kaolin-activated thromboelastography (TEG), and to compare 2 types of blood samples (ie, native and citrated whole blood [WB]), for determining r-TEG values in healthy dogs. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. ANIMALS: Sixteen healthy Beagles. INTERVENTIONS: Kaolin-activated TEG test using citrated WB samples and r-TEG test using native and citrated WB samples were performed in 16 dogs. At 60 minutes after the initial blood sampling, further samples were collected from a subset of 6 dogs in the same manner to evaluate intraindividual repeatability of r-TEG. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean time to maximum amplitude (MA) for r-TEG with native and citrated WB samples was recorded as 1313.9 ± 250.9 seconds and 1351.3 ± 264.6 seconds (mean ± SD), respectively, and 1779.9 ± 197.0 seconds for kaolin-activated TEG. Coefficients of variation with native and citrated WB samples for r-TEG values, TEG-activated clotting time, clot formation time, α angle, and MA, were determined to be 13.4% versus 18.8%, 11.1% versus 16.6%, 4.2% versus 5.1%, and 10.0% versus 10.0%, respectively. Intraindividual variations were lower for native WB samples than for citrated WB samples. CONCLUSIONS: The r-TEG test significantly decreased the mean time to MA compared with the kaolin-activated TEG test. In addition, native WB samples showed lower coefficients of variation and intraindividual variation than citrated WB samples in r-TEG analysis; this suggests that native WB samples can provide more consistent results. Therefore, the r-TEG method using native WB samples is recommended for assessment of dogs' hemostatic status when an early diagnosis is required. © Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society 2019.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent to which rapid thromboelastography (r-TEG) could decrease the testing time in comparison with that required for kaolin -activated thromboelastography (TEG), and to compare 2 types of blood samples (ie, native and citrated whole blood [WB]), for determining r-TEG values in healthy dogs . DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. ANIMALS: Sixteen healthy Beagles. INTERVENTIONS: Kaolin -activated TEG test using citrated WB samples and r-TEG test using native and citrated WB samples were performed in 16 dogs . At 60 minutes after the initial blood sampling, further samples were collected from a subset of 6 dogs in the same manner to evaluate intraindividual repeatability of r-TEG. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean time to maximum amplitude (MA) for r-TEG with native and citrated WB samples was recorded as 1313.9 ± 250.9 seconds and 1351.3 ± 264.6 seconds (mean ± SD), respectively, and 1779.9 ± 197.0 seconds for kaolin -activated TEG. Coefficients of variation with native and citrated WB samples for r-TEG values, TEG-activated clotting time, clot formation time, α angle, and MA, were determined to be 13.4% versus 18.8%, 11.1% versus 16.6%, 4.2% versus 5.1%, and 10.0% versus 10.0%, respectively. Intraindividual variations were lower for native WB samples than for citrated WB samples. CONCLUSIONS: The r-TEG test significantly decreased the mean time to MA compared with the kaolin -activated TEG test. In addition, native WB samples showed lower coefficients of variation and intraindividual variation than citrated WB samples in r-TEG analysis; this suggests that native WB samples can provide more consistent results. Therefore, the r-TEG method using native WB samples is recommended for assessment of dogs ' hemostatic status when an early diagnosis is required. © Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society 2019.
Entities: Chemical
Species
Keywords:
activated clotting time; blood sampling; dog; kaolin-activated TEG; rapid TEG
Mesh: See more »
Substances: See more »
Year: 2019
PMID: 31845529 DOI: 10.1111/vec.12907
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) ISSN: 1476-4431