INTRODUCTION: The effects of magnesium (Mg) supplementation on vascular function have been evaluated in some randomized controlled trials (RCT) but their results are conflicting. AIM: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to summarize the effects of oral Mg supplementation on vascular function in RCT. METHODS: The databases MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were accessed from inception to May 27, 2019. Intergroup differences (treatment vs. control group) related to changes in flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and pulse wave velocity (PWV), expressed as mean and standard deviation, were used to evaluate the effect of Mg supplementation on these outcomes. The results of the meta-analysis were expressed using a random-effects model. The heterogeneity between studies was evaluated using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: The oral supplementation of Mg had no significant effect on FMD (mean difference 2.13; 95% CI - 0.56, 4.82; p = 0.12) and PWV (mean difference - 0.54, 95% CI - 1.45, 0.36, p = 0.24). Heterogeneity for both outcomes (FMD and PWV) was high (I2 = 99%, p < 0.001). However, in subgroup analyses, oral Mg significantly improved FMD in studies longer than 6 months, in unhealthy subjects, in individuals older than 50 years, or in those with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2. The reduced number of RCT and the heterogeneity among them were the main limitations. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggest that oral Mg supplementation may improve endothelial function when conducted at least for 6 months and in unhealthy, overweight or older individuals. Registration number: PROSPERO CRD42019111462.
INTRODUCTION: The effects of magnesium (Mg) supplementation on vascular function have been evaluated in some randomized controlled trials (RCT) but their results are conflicting. AIM: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to summarize the effects of oral Mg supplementation on vascular function in RCT. METHODS: The databases MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were accessed from inception to May 27, 2019. Intergroup differences (treatment vs. control group) related to changes in flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and pulse wave velocity (PWV), expressed as mean and standard deviation, were used to evaluate the effect of Mg supplementation on these outcomes. The results of the meta-analysis were expressed using a random-effects model. The heterogeneity between studies was evaluated using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: The oral supplementation of Mg had no significant effect on FMD (mean difference 2.13; 95% CI - 0.56, 4.82; p = 0.12) and PWV (mean difference - 0.54, 95% CI - 1.45, 0.36, p = 0.24). Heterogeneity for both outcomes (FMD and PWV) was high (I2 = 99%, p < 0.001). However, in subgroup analyses, oral Mg significantly improved FMD in studies longer than 6 months, in unhealthy subjects, in individuals older than 50 years, or in those with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2. The reduced number of RCT and the heterogeneity among them were the main limitations. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggest that oral Mg supplementation may improve endothelial function when conducted at least for 6 months and in unhealthy, overweight or older individuals. Registration number: PROSPERO CRD42019111462.
Authors: Gary F Mitchell; Shih-Jen Hwang; Ramachandran S Vasan; Martin G Larson; Michael J Pencina; Naomi M Hamburg; Joseph A Vita; Daniel Levy; Emelia J Benjamin Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-01-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Massimo F Piepoli; Arno W Hoes; Stefan Agewall; Christian Albus; Carlos Brotons; Alberico L Catapano; Marie-Therese Cooney; Ugo Corrà; Bernard Cosyns; Christi Deaton; Ian Graham; Michael Stephen Hall; F D Richard Hobbs; Maja-Lisa Løchen; Herbert Löllgen; Pedro Marques-Vidal; Joep Perk; Eva Prescott; Josep Redon; Dimitrios J Richter; Naveed Sattar; Yvo Smulders; Monica Tiberi; H Bart van der Worp; Ineke van Dis; W M Monique Verschuren; Simone Binno Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Donna K Arnett; Roger S Blumenthal; Michelle A Albert; Andrew B Buroker; Zachary D Goldberger; Ellen J Hahn; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Amit Khera; Donald Lloyd-Jones; J William McEvoy; Erin D Michos; Michael D Miedema; Daniel Muñoz; Sidney C Smith; Salim S Virani; Kim A Williams; Joseph Yeboah; Boback Ziaeian Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2019-03-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sara A Chacko; Yiqing Song; Lauren Nathan; Lesley Tinker; Ian H de Boer; Fran Tylavsky; Robert Wallace; Simin Liu Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-11-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Pedro L Valenzuela; Pedro Carrera-Bastos; Beatriz G Gálvez; Gema Ruiz-Hurtado; José M Ordovas; Luis M Ruilope; Alejandro Lucia Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2020-10-09 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Rocío Barragán; Juan Llopis; Olga Portolés; Jose V Sorlí; Oscar Coltell; Lorenzo Rivas-García; Eva M Asensio; Carolina Ortega-Azorín; Dolores Corella; Cristina Sánchez-González Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-04-08 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Emma A Vermeulen; Hanne B T de Jong; Alexander G A Blomjous; Coby Eelderink; Tiny Hoekstra; Petra J M Elders; Martin H de Borst; Marc G Vervloet; Adriana J van Ballegooijen; Joline W Beulens Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2021-09-07 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Joëlle C Schutten; Peter J Joris; Iris Groendijk; Coby Eelderink; Dion Groothof; Yvonne van der Veen; Ralf Westerhuis; Frans Goorman; Richard M Danel; Martin H de Borst; Stephan J L Bakker Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-03-05 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Vanessa Gagliano; Fabian Schäffeler; Rosaria Del Giorno; Mario Bianchetti; Cesar Fabian Carvajal Canarte; José Joel Caballero Regueira; Luca Gabutti Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Caitríona Murphy; Jennifer Byrne; Jennifer B Keogh; Michelle L Headland; Peter M Clifton Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 3.390