Literature DB >> 31845262

Field test of SO3 removal in ultra-low emission coal-fired power plants.

Yang Zhang1,2, Chenghang Zheng3, Fushan Hu2, Haitao Zhao1, Shaojun Liu1, Zhengda Yang4, Yue Zhu2, Xiang Gao1.   

Abstract

Under the extensive implementation of ultra-low emission (ULE) facilities in coal-fired power plants of China, sulfur trioxide (SO3) has received increasing attention due to its impact on human health and operation safety of power plants. However, systematic research and evaluation for controlling SO3 emission in various ULE facilities are still lacking. Here, a systematic study was conducted based on 378 in situ performance evaluation tests carried out in 148 coal-fired power plants. The results illustrate that the SO2/SO3 conversion rate of the selective catalytic reduction devices can be controlled within 1% before and after ULE retrofit. Also, the synergistic removal efficiency of SO3 in the low-low-temperature electrostatic precipitator and the wet electrostatic precipitator can be higher than 70%. The removal efficiency of SO3 in the wet limestone-gypsum flue gas desulfurization scrubber is 33-64% before ULE and 31-81% after, and the average efficiency of the double scrubbers is 8.7% higher than that of the single scrubber. Due to the different SO3 removing abilities of various technologies, the overall efficiency of SO3 removal is in the range between 27 and 95% adopting different ULE technical routes. Average concentration of SO3 emission can be decreased by 51.8% after ULE application.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coal-fired power plants; SO3 emission; Synergistic removal; Technical route; Ultra-low emission

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31845262     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-07210-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  9 in total

1.  Distribution and emission characteristics of filterable and condensable particulate matter before and after a low-low temperature electrostatic precipitator.

Authors:  Xiaodong Li; Chenyang Zhou; Jingwei Li; Shengyong Lu; Jianhua Yan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  An alternative to additional SO3 injection for fly ash conditioning.

Authors:  D J Bayless; A R Khan; S Tanneer; R Birru
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  Rotational spectrum of SO3 and theoretical evidence for the formation of sixfold rotational energy-level clusters in its vibrational ground state.

Authors:  Daniel S Underwood; Sergei N Yurchenko; Jonathan Tennyson; Per Jensen
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Enhanced effects of ash and slag on SO3 formation in the post-flame region.

Authors:  Haiping Xiao; Qiyong Cheng; Jian Li; Jinlin Ge
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Performance of a pilot-scale wet electrostatic precipitator for the control of sulfuric acid mist.

Authors:  Jiayu Huang; Hongmei Wang; Yingjie Shi; Fan Zhang; Xiaoqing Dang; Hui Zhang; Yun Shu; Shuang Deng; Yu Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Removal characteristics of sulfuric acid aerosols from coal-fired power plants.

Authors:  Danping Pan; Linjun Yang; Hao Wu; Rongting Huang
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.235

7.  Environmental management of sulfur trioxide emission: impact of SO3 on human health.

Authors:  R Kikuchi
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.266

8.  Emissions of sulfur trioxide from coal-fired power plants.

Authors:  R K Srivastava; C A Miller; C Erickson; R Jambhekar
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.235

9.  Donor-Acceptor Complexes between Ammonia and Sulfur Trioxide: An FTIR and Computational Study.

Authors:  Karolina Haupa; Andrzej Bil; Zofia Mielke
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 2.781

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.