Manuel Pulido-Martos1, María Dolores Fernández-Sánchez1, Esther Lopez-Zafra2. 1. Department of Psychology, Universidad de Jaén, Campus las Lagunillas S/N, 23071, Jaén, Spain. 2. Department of Psychology, Universidad de Jaén, Campus las Lagunillas S/N, 23071, Jaén, Spain. elopez@ujaen.es.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study examines the adjustment of different equivalent measurement models for the factorial structures of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), which have shown a good fit to data from the general population. Furthermore, we examine measurement invariance (MI) based on gender and age. METHOD: A total of 1011 Spanish individuals (52.40% female) completed the CD-RISC. RESULTS: The results indicated that the 10-item single-factor model was the only model that fit the data. Significant latent mean differences showed that the levels of resilience among women were significantly lower than those among men. Regarding age, uniform MI was confirmed, showing the homogeneity of the population. CONCLUSIONS: Our exhaustive review of the extant published studies that address factor analyses and gender and age differences demonstrates that the results vary greatly. Furthermore, our model test comparison finds that the 10-item model is the best in the Spanish population. Moreover, men show higher resilience than women, while age is not a decisive variable, most likely showing that life events are more important than these demographic variables.
PURPOSE: This study examines the adjustment of different equivalent measurement models for the factorial structures of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), which have shown a good fit to data from the general population. Furthermore, we examine measurement invariance (MI) based on gender and age. METHOD: A total of 1011 Spanish individuals (52.40% female) completed the CD-RISC. RESULTS: The results indicated that the 10-item single-factor model was the only model that fit the data. Significant latent mean differences showed that the levels of resilience among women were significantly lower than those among men. Regarding age, uniform MI was confirmed, showing the homogeneity of the population. CONCLUSIONS: Our exhaustive review of the extant published studies that address factor analyses and gender and age differences demonstrates that the results vary greatly. Furthermore, our model test comparison finds that the 10-item model is the best in the Spanish population. Moreover, men show higher resilience than women, while age is not a decisive variable, most likely showing that life events are more important than these demographic variables.
Authors: Anthony C Waddimba; Bailey M Baker; Jamie R Pogue; Madison P McAuliffe; Monica M Bennett; Ronald D Baxter; David C Mohr; Ann Marie Warren Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2022-04-02 Impact factor: 3.440
Authors: Lindsey van der Meer; Lisa S Barsties; Leonie A Daalderop; Adja J M Waelput; Eric A P Steegers; Loes C M Bertens Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Francis Ankomah; Frank Quansah; Edmond Kwesi Agormedah; John Elvis Hagan; Medina Srem-Sai; Francis Sambah; Abdul-Aziz Seidu; Edward Kwabena Ameyaw; Bright Opoku Ahinkorah; Eugene Kofuor Maafo Darteh; Thomas Schack Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-26 Impact factor: 4.614