Gautam M Shetty1,2, Umesh Solanki3, Shikha Jain3, Sanya Linjhara3, Garima Anandani4,5, C S Ram6, Harshad Thakur7. 1. Research and Clinical Excellence, QI Spine Clinic, Mumbai, India. gautam.shetty@qispine.com. 2. QI India Healthcare, #6 Level 2 Phoenix Market City, LBS Road, Kamani, Kurla (West), Mumbai, 400070, India. gautam.shetty@qispine.com. 3. QI Spine Clinic, Delhi, India. 4. QI India Healthcare, #6 Level 2 Phoenix Market City, LBS Road, Kamani, Kurla (West), Mumbai, 400070, India. 5. QI Spine Clinic, Mumbai, India. 6. I.T.S College of Physiotherapy, Ghaziabad, India. 7. Centre for Public Health, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, India.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to determine the efficacy of an integrated active, rehabilitation protocol in patients ≥ 65 years of age with chronic mechanical low back pain and compare the results in similar patients in 50-64 years age group. METHODS: Pre- and post-treatment mean numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) score, mean Oswestry disability index (ODI) score, treatment outcome category and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds achieved for NPRS and ODI scores post-treatment were compared among 697 patients in the 50-64 years and 495 patients in the ≥ 65 years age groups. RESULTS: At a mean treatment duration of 57 days (range, 30-90 days), both mean NPRS score (p < 0.0001) and mean ODI score (p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in the ≥ 65 years age group when compared to the 50-64 years age group. However, post-treatment outcome categories (p = 0.17) and percentage of patients who achieved MCID thresholds for NPRS score (p = 0.13) and ODI score (p = 0.18) were not significantly different between the two groups. There was a significant correlation between post-treatment NPRS score and patient age and pre-treatment NPRS score and between post-treatment ODI score and incidence of osteoporosis and pre-treatment ODI score. CONCLUSION: Although mean NPRS and ODI scores achieved were significantly better in patients of 50-64 years of age, our integrated active, rehabilitation protocol helped achieve significant improvement in NPRS score, MCID thresholds for NPRS and ODI scores and treatment outcomes in patients ≥ 65 years of age, similar to patients in the 50-64 years of age group, at the end of 3 months of treatment. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to determine the efficacy of an integrated active, rehabilitation protocol in patients ≥ 65 years of age with chronic mechanical low back pain and compare the results in similar patients in 50-64 years age group. METHODS: Pre- and post-treatment mean numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) score, mean Oswestry disability index (ODI) score, treatment outcome category and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds achieved for NPRS and ODI scores post-treatment were compared among 697 patients in the 50-64 years and 495 patients in the ≥ 65 years age groups. RESULTS: At a mean treatment duration of 57 days (range, 30-90 days), both mean NPRS score (p < 0.0001) and mean ODI score (p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in the ≥ 65 years age group when compared to the 50-64 years age group. However, post-treatment outcome categories (p = 0.17) and percentage of patients who achieved MCID thresholds for NPRS score (p = 0.13) and ODI score (p = 0.18) were not significantly different between the two groups. There was a significant correlation between post-treatment NPRS score and patient age and pre-treatment NPRS score and between post-treatment ODI score and incidence of osteoporosis and pre-treatment ODI score. CONCLUSION: Although mean NPRS and ODI scores achieved were significantly better in patients of 50-64 years of age, our integrated active, rehabilitation protocol helped achieve significant improvement in NPRS score, MCID thresholds for NPRS and ODI scores and treatment outcomes in patients ≥ 65 years of age, similar to patients in the 50-64 years of age group, at the end of 3 months of treatment. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Entities:
Keywords:
Elderly; Low back pain; Physical therapy modalities; Rehabilitation; Spine
Authors: Iman Ghanei; Björn E Rosengren; Ralph Hasserius; Jan-Åke Nilsson; Dan Mellström; Claes Ohlsson; Östen Ljunggren; Magnus K Karlsson Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2013-12-27 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Pieter H Helmhout; J Bart Staal; Martijn W Heymans; Chris C Harts; Erik J M Hendriks; Rob A de Bie Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2009-12-25 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Heather K Vincent; Kevin R Vincent; Amanda N Seay; Bryan P Conrad; Robert W Hurley; Steven Z George Journal: PM R Date: 2013-11-07 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Nayza M B Rosa; Bárbara Z Queiroz; Renata A Lopes; Natalia R Sampaio; Daniele S Pereira; Leani S M Pereira Journal: Braz J Phys Ther Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 3.377