Shervin Assari1,2,3,4, Maryam Moghani Lankarani4. 1. Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. 2. BRITE Center for Science, Research and Policy, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. 3. Center for Research on Ethnicity, Culture, and Health (CRECH), School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, 4250 Plymouth Rd., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2700, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although the protective effects of socioeconomic status (SES) on health behaviors are well-known, according to the minorities' diminished return theory, the health return of SES, particularly educational attainment, is systemically smaller for minorities than Whites. Aims. The current study explored Black-White differences in the effects of educational attainment and income on the consumption of fruits and vegetables. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2017 (n = 3217). HINTS is a nationally representative survey of American adults. The current analysis included 2277 adults who were either non-Hispanic White (n = 1868; 82%) or non-Hispanic Black (n = 409; 18%). The independent variables in this study were SES (educational attainment and income). The dependent variable was consumption of fruits and vegetables. Race was the focal moderator. RESULTS: In the overall sample, high educational attainment and income were associated with higher consumption of fruits and vegetables. Race moderated the effect of educational attainment but not income on the consumption of fruits and vegetables. CONCLUSION: In line with the past research in the United States, Whites constantly gain more health benefits from the very same educational attainment than Blacks. The health gain from income is more equal across races than the health gain from educational attainment. Such diminished returns may be due to racism across institutions in the United States.
BACKGROUND: Although the protective effects of socioeconomic status (SES) on health behaviors are well-known, according to the minorities' diminished return theory, the health return of SES, particularly educational attainment, is systemically smaller for minorities than Whites. Aims. The current study explored Black-White differences in the effects of educational attainment and income on the consumption of fruits and vegetables. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 2017 (n = 3217). HINTS is a nationally representative survey of American adults. The current analysis included 2277 adults who were either non-Hispanic White (n = 1868; 82%) or non-Hispanic Black (n = 409; 18%). The independent variables in this study were SES (educational attainment and income). The dependent variable was consumption of fruits and vegetables. Race was the focal moderator. RESULTS: In the overall sample, high educational attainment and income were associated with higher consumption of fruits and vegetables. Race moderated the effect of educational attainment but not income on the consumption of fruits and vegetables. CONCLUSION: In line with the past research in the United States, Whites constantly gain more health benefits from the very same educational attainment than Blacks. The health gain from income is more equal across races than the health gain from educational attainment. Such diminished returns may be due to racism across institutions in the United States.
Entities:
Keywords:
African-Americans; Blacks; Whites; diet; education; fruit and vegetable; income; nutrition; population groups; race; socioeconomics
Authors: LaVonna Blair Lewis; David C Sloane; Lori Miller Nascimento; Allison L Diamant; Joyce Jones Guinyard; Antronette K Yancey; Gwendolyn Flynn Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Joreintje D Mackenbach; Henning Tiemeier; Jan van der Ende; Ilse M T Nijs; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Albert Hofman; Frank C Verhulst; Pauline W Jansen Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 2.225
Authors: David E Nelson; Gary L Kreps; Bradford W Hesse; Robert T Croyle; Gordon Willis; Neeraj K Arora; Barbara K Rimer; K V Viswanath; Neil Weinstein; Sara Alden Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2004 Sep-Oct
Authors: Jennifer Karas Montez; Mark D Hayward; Dustin C Brown; Robert A Hummer Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2009-03-23 Impact factor: 4.077