| Literature DB >> 31844721 |
Rachid Hsissou1,2, Omar Dagdag1, Mohamed Berradi3, Mehdi El Bouchti3, Mohammed Assouag2, Ahmed Elharfi1.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: Chemical engineering; Composite; Corrosion; Materials chemistry; NMR; Polymer; Rheology; SEM
Year: 2019 PMID: 31844721 PMCID: PMC6895731 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02789
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Scheme 1Synthesis of the penta-amino pentamethylene dianiline of phosphorus.
Scheme 2Synthesis of epoxy polymer DGPMDAP.
Scheme 3Epoxy polymer DGPMDAP crosslinked by MDA.
Fig. 1Preparation of material composite (DGPMDAP/MDA/TiO2).
Fig. 21H NMR spectrum of DGPMDAP.
Fig. 313C NMR spectrum of DGPMDAP.
Fig. 4G′ and G″ as function of temperature.
Fig. 5G′ as function of frequency at different composite (DGPMDAP/MDA/TiO2).
Fig. 6G″ as function of frequency at different composite (DGPMDAP/MDA/TiO2).
Fig. 7Cole-Cole chart for composite (DGPMDAP/MDA/TiO2) at different formulation.
Fig. 8Morphology of different composite (DGPMDAP/MDA/TiO2) at various percentages (0, 5, 10 and 15%) of TiO2.
Fig. 9PDP plot in 1 M HCl solution for carbon steel without and with various concentrations of DGPMDAP.
PDP parameters without and with various concentrations of epoxy polymer DGPMDAP.
| Inhibitor | Concentration (M) | - Ecorr (mV) | icorr (μA cm−2) | Tafel slopes (mV dec−1) | EI (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (- βc) | (βa) | |||||
| HCl | 1.0 | 437 | 259 | 119 | 68 | - |
| DGPMDAP | 10–6 | 437 | 72 | 106 | 56 | |
| 10–5 | 439 | 64 | 63 | 51 | ||
| 10–4 | 438 | 28 | 90 | 48 | ||
| 10–3 | 447 | 21 | 24 | 25 | ||
Fig. 10Nyquist diagram in the absence and in the presence of various concentrations of DGPMDAP.
Fig. 11Bode diagrams in the absence and in the presence of various concentrations of DGPMDAP.
EIS parameters without and in the presence of various concentrations of DGPMDAP.
| Inhibitor | Concentration (M) | Rs (Ω cm2) | Cdl (μF cm−2) | Rct (Ω cm2) | IE (%) | θ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank | 1.0 | 0.456 | 314 | 38 | - | |
| DGPMDAP | 10–6 | 1.056 | 244.1 | 190 | 80 | 0.80 |
| 10–5 | 1.220 | 173.2 | 202 | 81 | 0.81 | |
| 10–4 | 1.351 | 155.1 | 222 | 83 | 0.83 | |
| 10–3 | 1.540 | 58.77 | 418 | 91 | 0.91 |
Fig. 12ECE used.
Fig. 13Langmuir adsorption isotherm of DGPMDAP by two methods (PDP and EIS) at 298 K.
Langmuir adsorption parameters.
| Inhibitor | Techniques | R2 | Kads (M−1.106) | - |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DGPMDAP | PDP | 1 | 0.46 | 42.72 |
| EIS | 0.999 | 0.25 | 40.79 |
Fig. 14Image of MEB without (a) and with (b) DGPMDAP.