| Literature DB >> 31844705 |
Is Fatimah1, Nurcahyo Iman Prakoso1, Imam Sahroni1, M Miqdam Musawwa1, Yoke-Leng Sim2, Fethi Kooli3, Oki Muraza4.
Abstract
In this work, TiO2/SiO2 composite photocatalysts were prepared using biogenic silica extracted from bamboo leaves and titanium tetraisopropoxide as a titania precursor via a sol-gel mechanism. A study of the physicochemical properties of materials as a function of their titanium dioxide content was conducted using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, a scanning electron microscope, a diffuse reflectance ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectrophotometer, and a gas sorption analyzer. The relationship between physicochemical parameters and photocatalytic performance was evaluated using the methylene blue (MB) photocatalytic degradation process under UV irradiation with and without the addition of H2O2 as an oxidant. The results demonstrated that increasing the TiO2 helps enhance the parameters of specific surface area, the pore volume, and the particle size of titanium dioxide, while the band gap energy reaches a maximum of 3.21 eV for 40% and 60% Ti content. The composites exhibit photocatalytic activity with the MB degradation with increasing photocatalytic efficiency since the composites with 40 and 60% wt. of TiO2 demonstrated the higher degradation rate compared with TiO2 in the presence and absence of H2O2. This higher rate is correlated with the higher specific surface area and band gap energy compared with those of TiO2.Entities:
Keywords: Biogenic silica; Environmental science; Materials chemistry; Photocatalyst; TiO2; TiO2/SiO2 composites
Year: 2019 PMID: 31844705 PMCID: PMC6895692 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02766
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1SEM profile of (a) BLA (b) SiO2 (c) 20TiO2/SiO2 (d) 30TiO2/SiO2, (e) 40TiO2/SiO2, and (f) 60TiO2/SiO2.
Elemental analysis of BLA and TiO2/SiO2 samples.
| Element (mass %) | BLA | SiO2 | 20TiO2/SiO2 | 30TiO2/SiO2 | 40TiO2/SiO2 | 60TiO2/SiO2 | TiO2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O | 47.53 | 42.53 | 48.3 | 46.56 | 32.72 | 39.47 | 42.77 |
| Si | 27.65 | 47.65 | 30.17 | 24.45 | 20.23 | 1.65 | n.d |
| Na | 3.56 | 3.56 | 1.07 | 0.68 | 7.03 | 1.37 | n.d |
| Ti | n.d | n.d | 18.88 | 27.89 | 39.9 | 55.80 | 57.23 |
| C | 20.03 | 5.03 | 0.56 | 0.34 | n.d | n.d | n.d |
| Al | 1.23 | 1.23 | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d | n.d |
| S | n.d | n.d | 1.02 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 1.06 | n.d |
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
nd: not detected.
Fig. 2FTIR spectra of SiO2 and TiO2/SiO2.
Fig. 3XRD pattern of materials.
Surface area, pore volume and pore radius of materials.
| Sample | BET specific surface area (m2/g) | Pore Volume (cc) | Pore Radius (Å) | TiO2 crystallite size (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | 20.98 | 2.30 × 10−2 | 102.2 | 0 |
| 20TiO2/SiO2 | 55.45 | 5.23 × 10−2 | 93.4 | 6.44 |
| 30TiO2/SiO2 | 124.04 | 1.95 × 10−1 | 35.7 | 6.86 |
| 40TiO2/SiO2 | 165.16 | 3.62 × 10−1 | 38.2 | 9.05 |
| 60TiO2/SiO2 | 289.23 | 4.02 × 10−1 | 29.43 | 13.08 |
| TiO2 | 135.23 | 2.21 × 10−1 | 35.6 | 11.5 |
Fig. 4(a) Adsorption-desorption profile and (b) BJH-pore distribution of materials.
Fig. 5DRS spectra of materials.
Fig. 6(a) Kinetics of MB photocatalytic degradation without H2O2 addition (b) Kinetics of MB photocatalytic degradation with H2O2 addition (c) pseudo-first order plot of MB photocatalytic degradation using 20TiO2/SiO2 and 20TiO2/SiO2-TEOS (d) TON of photocatalytic degradation over varied photocatalysts.
Kinetics models and parameters of MB degradation by photocatalysis and photooxidation using materials.
| Photocatalytic degradation | Condition | Kinetics model | Equation (R2) | Initial rate (ppm/min) | Kinetics constant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | Without H2O2 | Pseudo-zero order | Co-Ct = 6.61.10−3 | 4.85.10−2 | 6.61.10−3 |
| 20TiO2/SiO2 | Without H2O2 | Pseudo-first order | ln (Co/Ct) = -6.96.10−3 | 4.79. 10−2 | 6.96.10−3 |
| 30TiO2/SiO2 | Without H2O2 | Pseudo-first order | ln (Co/Ct) = -7.81.10−3 | 6.25. 10−2 | 1.79.10−2 |
| 40TiO2/SiO2 | Without H2O2 | Pseudo-first order | ln (Co/Ct) = -2.53.10−2 | 0.175 | 2.53.10−2 |
| 60TiO2/SiO2 | Without H2O2 | Pseudo-first order | ln (Co/Ct) = -3.74.10−2 | 0.209 | 3.74.10−2 |
| TiO2 | Without H2O2 | Pseudo-first order | ln (Co/Ct) = -2.12.10−2 | 6.45. 10−2 | 2.12.10−2 |
| SiO2 | With H2O2 | Pseudo-zero order | (Co-Ct = 6.62.10−3 | 4.85.10−2 | 6.61.10−3 |
| 20TiO2/SiO2 | With H2O2 | Pseudo-first order | ln (Co/Ct) = -0.042.10−2 | 0.405 | 4.2.10−2 |
| 30TiO2/SiO2 | With H2O2 | Pseudo-first order | ln (Co/Ct) = -0.064.10−2 | 0.475 | 6.30.10−2 |
| 40TiO2/SiO2 | With H2O2 | Modified-Freundlich model | (1-Ct/Co) = -1.527t2.30 (0.9954) | 0.488 | 0.235 |
| 60TiO2/SiO2 | With H2O2 | Modified- Freundlich model | (1-Ct/Co) = -0.822t3.91 (0.9954) | 0.599 | 0.374 |
| TiO2 | With H2O2 | Pseudo-first order | ln (Co/Ct) = -2.52.10−2 | 0.525 | 5.3.10−2 |
Physicochemical character of 20TiO2/SiO2-TEOS.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Element (mass %) | |
| O | 47.89 |
| Si | 32.31 |
| Ti | 19.80 |
| Specific surface area (m2/g) | 76.15 |
| Pore Volume (cc/g) | 52.70 |
| Band Gap Energy (eV) | 3.18 |
Fig. 7Kinetics of photocatalytic degradation by 20TiO2/SiO2 and 20TiO2/SiO2-TEOS.
Fig. 8UV-Vis spectra of treated MB solution by photocatalytic degradation (a) without H2O2 addition (b) without H2O2 addition.