| Literature DB >> 31844548 |
Taeyoung Kil1, Hak-Man Kim2, Minkyu Kim3,4.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of group combined intervention that combined animal-assisted therapy and integrated elderly play therapy on the depression, self-esteem, and emotional expression of geriatric patients residing in nursing homes. This was achieved by providing cognitive, physical, and emotional activities and social interaction at the same time. The group combined intervention method was applied to twelve elderly patients (six in the control group, six in the experimental group) aged 65 or older who live in a nursing home for the elderly in C province, from May 3, 2019 to June 21, 2019, for a total of 8 times (once a week, 50 minutes at a time). The quantitative evaluation was analyzed through SPSS 21.0 for comparison before and after the program was implemented, using the Korean version of the depression and the self-esteem scale. The qualitative evaluation compared emotional expression pre-test and post-test. The major results of the study were as follows: First, the group combined intervention was effective in reducing depression levels of the experimental group among the elderly patients. Second, it was effective in improving the self-esteem of the experimental group among the elderly patients. Third, it showed a significant difference in the emotional expression of the experimental group among the elderly patients. Therefore, it was found that group combined intervention reduces depression and improves self-esteem and emotional expression of the elderly. Based on these results, it is hoped that this study will be a cornerstone in the development of concrete programs for the benefit of elderly patients living in facilities. © Copyright 2019 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology.Entities:
Keywords: Animal-assisted therapy; Depression; Group combined intervention; Integrated elderly play therapy; Self-esteem
Year: 2019 PMID: 31844548 PMCID: PMC6906124 DOI: 10.5187/jast.2019.61.6.371
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Technol ISSN: 2055-0391
General characteristics of the experimental group
| Participants | Gender | Age | Religion | Education | Income level | Geriatric diseases | Activity characteristic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | M | 86 | Christian | High school graduate | Lower-middle | Hypertension, diabetes, stroke | The lower limb function is inconvenient, but the upper limb function is good and can be operated by wheelchair. |
| B | M | 75 | Christian | Middle school graduate | Middle | Hyperthyroidism, hypernasitis, hypofunction | Cognitive state and communication is good, and it is possible to take a wheelchair. |
| C | F | 76 | Atheist | Elementary school graduate | Middle | Stroke (hemiplegia) | Although she has mild cognitive impairment, she can participate in the program in a wheelchair. |
| D | F | 81 | Buddhist | Elementary school graduate | Lower-middle | Diabetes, minor dementia | Sometimes she show abnormal behavior, but general communication is possible, and she can act as normal walking. |
| E | F | 78 | Atheist | Elementary school graduate | Upper-middle | Stroke | A strong will to rehabilitate and active in a wheelchair. |
| F | F | 81 | Atheist | Middle school graduate | Middle | Cerebral infarction, wrist fracture | A week after entering the hospital, she have a little inconvenience and can participate in the program. |
M, male; F, female.
Effective verification model of group combined intervention
| Group | Pre-test | Intervention | Post-test |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | O1 | X1[ | O2 |
| Control group | O3 | - | O4 |
Multimodal interventional program.
Pre-test, the day of intervention; Post-test, end of intervention.
Emotional word classification
| Positive emotional expressions | Neutral emotional expressions | Negative emotional expressions |
|---|---|---|
| Enjoyment, pleasure, happiness, satisfaction, warmth, sense of accomplishment, expectation, ecstasy, interest, excitement, impressive, interesting etc. | Surprise, hardness, flat, extraordinary etc. | Disappointment, sadness, stifling, frustration, unhappiness, irritability, loneliness, dreariness, anger, fear, unfairness, regret, terrible, painfulness, guilt, suffering, worry, discomfort, no desire, futility, etc. |
Contents of group combined intervention program
| Stage (session) | Goal | Combined intervention activity and integration foundations by session | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Session | Activities | ||
| Initial (1–2) | Lapo formation | 1 | - Making name tag/Introducing
myself and learning names of friends (IEPT-social
interaction activity) |
| Ice-breaking to form intimacy and trust between group members, play therapists and therapy dogs | 2 | - Greeting a friend/singing rounds
(IEPT-social interaction activity) | |
| Middle (3–6) | The approaching activities of combined intervention | 3 | - Ensemble with maracas/our puppy
is a Shaggy Puppy (IEPT-physical activity) |
| - Cognitive
activity | 4 | - | |
| 5 | - Hands-on games/prevention of
dementia by finger yoga (IEPT-physical
activity) | ||
| 6 | - Talking about traditional story
‘The dog and the cat’ (IEPT-cognitive
activity) | ||
| Final (7–8) | Activity and preparation for finishing the program | 7 | - Therapy dogs grooming/collage
(IEPT-physical activity) |
| Discussion and exchanged opinions about the program, sharing joyful experiences and precious memories, feedback and reviews | 8 | - You are flower, I am flower
(IEPT-emotional activity) |
IEPT, integrated elderly play therapy; AAT, animal-assisted therapy.
The effects of group combined intervention program on depression in elderly patients
| Variables | Group (n = 6, each group) | Pre-test (Mean ± SD) | Post-test (Mean ± SD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depression | Experiment | 0.84 ± 0.11[ | 0.62 ± 0.13[ |
| Control | 0.82 ± 0.14[ | 0.83 ± 0.12[ |
Within rows, values with different superscripts are significant different (p < 0.05).
The effects of group combined intervention program on self-esteem in elderly patients
| Variables | Group (n = 6, each group) | Pre-test (Mean ± SD) | Post-test (Mean ± SD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Self-esteem | Experiment | 3.38 ± 0.47a | 3.71 ± 0.32b |
| Control | 3.22 ± 0.45a | 3.28 ± 0.41a |
Within rows, values with different superscripts are significant different (p < 0.05).
The change of emotion before and after the application of group combined intervention program participant in elderly patients
| Variables | Pre-test (Mean ± SD) | Post-test (Mean ± SD) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive emotion | 38.15 ± 6.56[ | 57.17 ± 6.89[ | 2.581 |
| Negative emotion | 52.16 ± 9.65[ | 39.15 ± 8.96[ | –1.961 |
Within rows, values with different superscripts are significant different (p < 0.05).