Literature DB >> 31844359

Utilization of Water Utility Lime Sludge for Flue Gas Desulfurization in Coal-Fired Power Plants: Part III. Testing at a Higher Scale and Assessment of Selected Potential Operational Issues.

Seyed A Dastgheib1, Justin Mock1, Hafiz H Salih1, Craig Patterson2.   

Abstract

The feasibility of lime sludge utilization for flue gas desulfurization was evaluated by continuing the previous laboratory-scale studies at a higher scale and investigating two potential operational issues, namely viscosity and metal corrosion. Two lime sludge samples and a baseline limestone sample, which were previously characterized and tested for SO2 capture from a simulated flue gas at a laboratory scale, were first tested at a 10-fold scale with a simulated flue gas, and then tested with a slipstream of flue gas from a coal-fired power plant. The tested lime sludge and limestone slurries reduced the SO2 concentration of the simulated flue gas from 2000 to <1 ppm, and they demonstrated similar Hg reemission profiles. Field-testing results revealed that the limestone and lime sludge slurries reduced the SO2 concentration of the flue gas from ~1500 to <1 ppm. These experiments confirmed our previous smaller scale laboratory results that lime sludge can function as a suitable substitute for limestone for SO2 removal from the flue gas of coal-fired power plants without negatively affecting Hg reemission. Two operational issues, namely viscosity and metal corrosion, were investigated to evaluate practical issues in the transition from limestone to lime sludge at power plants. Results of Marsh funnel viscosity experiments conducted at different solids contents and temperatures indicated the limestone and lime sludge slurries and their gypsum counterparts had similar flow characteristics. Carbon-steel, stainless-steel, and Hastelloy coupons were tested for corrosion by lime sludge and limestone slurries. Both stainless steel and Hastelloy were resistive to corrosion in slurries made from lime sludge or limestone samples or their gypsum counterparts. A considerable but similar amount of corrosion was observed for carbon-steel coupons exposed to lime sludge and limestone slurries. Adding 5000 ppm of Cl- to slurries considerably increased the corrosion rate of carbon steel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corrosion; flue gas desulfurization; lime sludge; limestone; mercury reemission; viscosity

Year:  2019        PMID: 31844359      PMCID: PMC6913041          DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Energy Fuels        ISSN: 0887-0624            Impact factor:   3.605


  6 in total

1.  Flue gas desulfurization: the state of the art.

Authors:  R K Srivastava; W Jozewicz
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.235

2.  Pilot-scale demonstration of the hybrid zero-valent iron process for treating flue-gas-desulfurization wastewater: part I.

Authors:  Yong H Huang; Phani K Peddi; Hui Zeng; Ci-Lai Tang; Xinjun Teng
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.915

Review 3.  Survey of catalysts for oxidation of mercury in flue gas.

Authors:  Albert A Presto; Evan J Granite
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Utilization of Water Utility Lime Sludge for Flue Gas Desulfurization in Coal-Fired Power Plants: Part I. Supply-Demand Evaluation and Life Cycle Assessment.

Authors:  Hafiz Salih; Craig Patterson; Jiaxing Li; Justin Mock; Seyed A Dastgheib
Journal:  Energy Fuels       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.605

5.  Utilization of Water Utility Lime Sludge for Flue Gas Desulfurization in Coal-Fired Power Plants: Part II. Lime Sludge Characterization and Mercury Reemission.

Authors:  Seyed A Dastgheib; Hafiz H Salih; Jiaxing Li; Craig Patterson
Journal:  Energy Fuels       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  Impact of sulfur oxides on mercury capture by activated carbon.

Authors:  Albert A Presto; Evan J Granite
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.