Literature DB >> 31844192

Global no net loss of natural ecosystems.

Martine Maron1,2, Jeremy S Simmonds3,4, James E M Watson3,4,5, Laura J Sonter3,4, Leon Bennun6,7, Victoria F Griffiths8, Fabien Quétier9, Amrei von Hase10, Stephen Edwards11, Hugo Rainey5, Joseph W Bull12, Conrad E Savy13, Ray Victurine5, Joseph Kiesecker14, Philippe Puydarrieux11, Todd Stevens5, Naïg Cozannet15, Julia P G Jones16.   

Abstract

A global goal of no net loss of natural ecosystems or better has recently been proposed, but such a goal would require equitable translation to country-level contributions. Given the wide variation in ecosystem depletion, these could vary from net gain (for countries where restoration is needed), to managed net loss (in rare circumstances where natural ecosystems remain extensive and human development imperative is greatest). National contributions and international support for implementation also must consider non-area targets (for example, for threatened species) and socioeconomic factors such as the capacity to conserve and the imperative for human development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31844192     DOI: 10.1038/s41559-019-1067-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2397-334X            Impact factor:   15.460


  1 in total

1.  Protected area targets post-2020.

Authors:  Piero Visconti; Stuart H M Butchart; Thomas M Brooks; Penny F Langhammer; Daniel Marnewick; Sheila Vergara; Alberto Yanosky; James E M Watson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 47.728

  1 in total
  2 in total

1.  Prioritizing where to restore Earth's ecosystems.

Authors:  Simon Ferrier
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  How percentage-protected targets can support positive biodiversity outcomes.

Authors:  Carlos Carroll; Reed F Noss
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 7.563

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.